🔥 The Five Worst Poker Scenes in Cinema | Casino Parties

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🤑

Filter:
Sort:
A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Casino Royale (2006) | Last Hand Poker Scene | Movie Clip HD Casino Royale is a 2006 spy film, the.


Enjoy!
Access to this page has been denied.
Valid for casinos
Baccarat (card game) - Wikipedia
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Casino Royale High Stakes set poker.
From Ian Flemings Casino Royale Casino Royale introduces James Bond before he holds his license to kill.
But Bond is no less dangerous, and with two professional assassinations in quick succession, he is elevated to casino royale poker hands status.
Bond's first 007 mission takes him to Uganda where he is to spy on a terrorist, Mollaka.
Not everything goes to plan and Bond decides to investigate, casino royale poker hands of MI6, in order to track down the rest of the terrorist cell.
Following a lead to the Bahamas, he encounters Dimitrios and his girlfriend, Solange.
He learns that Dimitrios is involved with Le Chiffre, banker to the world's terrorist organizations.
Secret Service intelligence reveals that Le Chiffre is planning to raise money in a high-stakes poker click in Montenegro at Le Casino Royale.
MI6 assigns 007 to play against him, knowing that if Le Chiffre loses, it will destroy his organization.
At first skeptical of what value Vesper can provide, Bond's interest in her deepens as they brave danger together and even torture at the hands of Le Chiffre.
In Montenegro, Casino royale poker hands allies himself with Mathis MI6's local field agent, and Felix Leiter who is representing the interests of the CIA.
The marathon game proceeds with dirty tricks and violence, raising the stakes beyond blood money and reaching a terrifying climax.
Product info Casino Royale High Stakes set Its all packed in a nice black wooden box with Casino Royale logo.
These chips and cards are the exact same as used in the movie!
It also contains 1 rule book for Texas Holdem.
Its all packed in a nice black wooden box with Casino Royale logo.
These chips and cards are the exact same as used in the movie!
From Ian Flemings Casino Royale Related products Incredibly stylish, 14 gram chip from the James Bond movie "Casino Royale".
click here plastic chips.
The weight is perfectly balanced and the chips stack higher than regular plastic chips.
The weight is perfectly balanced and the chips stack higher than regular plastic chips.
The weight is perfectly balanced and the chips stack higher than regular plastic chips.
The weight is perfectly balanced and the chips stack higher than regular plastic chips.
The weight is perfectly balanced and the chips stack higher than regular plastic chips.
Its measures 95 x 66 mm weighs 47 gram.

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Embedded above is a climactic scene from the 2006 James Bond movie Casino Royale. Waddell explains just how lucky Bond is here: All four ...


Enjoy!
Baccarat (card game) - Wikipedia
Valid for casinos
The Five Worst Poker Scenes in Cinema | Casino Parties
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Televised Poker Discussions about televised poker shows of all kinds including the World Poker Tour, NAPT, WSOP, Poker After Dark and High Stakes Poker.
What do you think about Craig's line here?
How about the chinese guy checking his K high flush on the turn?
And then casino royale poker hands at the river.
I think it was a horrible play.
I think this vid casino royale poker hands what u get when u slowplay ur hands.
It wasnt craigs hand, it was James Bonds hand.
Was a slow roll by Bond though heh.
I like the minraise on the river by that dude, then James raising all-in giving the dude 52:1 odds, and he's not snapcalling.
LOL spin and go poker hud u degens analyzing this hand Cosign.
Gotta think some of this is in jest though.
I think James Bond should play Teddy KGB.
That would be an epic poker battle.
I can picture Bond winning the match, some how by snapping his neck some point in the match for some odd reason.
Also it's possible but very unlikely, this is almost impossible.
If it happened IRL the dealer would have his fingers broken, just because.
I remember a story from the old days of Vegas.
Jack Binion I casino royale poker hands, in a game at the old Horseshoe.
He was playing a high stakes cash game and was dealt the pat nuts on the very first hand.
He folded and left the game.
Someone asked him why he left, and Jack told him what he was dealt.
Everyone would just assume I cheated, even if they didn't say anything.
Winning one hand of poker isn't worth that hassel.

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

The Poker of Casino Royale--Meadowlark Lemon?!?. Compare that with CR, where of all the poker hands where we see the cards, the lowest ...


Enjoy!
The Most Famous Poker Hands in Movie History and the Odds Against Them | Poker hands, Poker, Casino games
Valid for casinos
The Most Famous Poker Hands in Movie History and the Odds Against Them | Poker hands, Poker, Casino games
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
casino royale poker hands

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Casino Royale Year: 2006. Tagline: Always Bet on Bond. Crucial Hand: Bond, four-handed wins with a straight flush to eliminate all the ...


Enjoy!
I Expect You To Die!: The Poker of Casino Royale--Meadowlark Lemon?!?
Valid for casinos
chakefashion.com?v=bwPd8WmVP54
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Poker scene [ Casino Royale ]

🔥 404 Not Found

Software - MORE
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Each chip awards a deal of cards that can award up to 10,000 credits, a “Casino Bonus” of poker hands, or the Minor or Major progressives.


Enjoy!
Contenu introuvable
Valid for casinos
Just Saw Casino Royale... The Poker Content Was... Meh. - General Poker Forum - FCP Poker Forum
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Casino Royale - Poker Scene [HD Clip]

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

... forum - James Bond Poker Play in "Casino Royale" 2006, page 1.. us to the villain Le Chiffre's poker predilection, does not show the hand.


Enjoy!
ERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Valid for casinos
ERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
As an amateur poker player as well as Bond fan, I have broken down the final hand to see if it actually makes sense as played.
In other words, I went back to analyze what the players knew and what they did at the stages of the hand.
I have reached four conclusions: 1.
When the 4th community card 4th Street is dealt, Bond cannot lose and would have to know that; 2.
Both Bond and LeChiffre have very questionable opening hands; 3.
Someone, probably the large African gentleman should have bet rather than checked after 4th Street was revealed; 4.
go here far as I can tell, LeChiffre badly misplays this hand based on what he knows.
My detailed analysis of the game is set forth below.
First, it appears from the betting order that Bond is the small blind and that the Asian gentleman henceforth abbreviated "A" is the large blind.
I would note that A and B would be expected to stay in with their hands particularly since A is the big blind and there's no penalty.
LeChiffre's hand is one that most players would not play.
Bond's hand is marginally better than LeChiffre's but would 888 promo code october not be played, although since Bond is the small blind he is only risking half a bet to see the flop assuming no raises on this round.
Now the flop: Casino royale poker hands H 8 S 6 S Again we don't get to see the betting but A now has both a potential flush and a potential straight.
B is looking very good with hidden trips three of a kind.
L has two pair aces and sixes which is not that strong a hand but whether he stays in or not would probably depend on the signals he received from the bettting, which, unfortunately though understandably for movie pacing they don't show us.
Bond now has a potential straight, a potential flush, or a potential straight flush and the nature of the signals received from the betting would probably dictate whether he stays in or not.
Now, 4th Street: 4 Swhich makes the Board A H 8 S 6 S 4 S Bond: has now hit his straight flush.
He absolutely cannot lose this hand and has to know it by this point.
There is no possible combination of cards that can beat him.
He checks, presumably to lure LeChiffre into calling a subsequent all in raise known as the "check raise" strategy.
A has made his flush.
He checks, which is surprising, because there are possible hands which could beat him with this board.
I would have expected him to bet see more try to uncover other players' real strength.
B: Still stuck at trips.
Lots of possible hands could beat him and I would think a good player would definitely bet to casino royale poker hands to determine if anyone is likely to beat him.
L: Still stuck at 2 pair, he might check to get a free card and see if he can make his full house, and that is what he does.
Checks to lure the other players in.
A: Now has an Ace high flush, a slightly better flush than his previous flush but not significantly better.
He goes all in with plenty of potential hands that could beat him and no idea from the betting whether those hands are out there.
B: hits a full house 8's and Aces.
Has to know that both a higher full house and a straight flush are out there and could beat him.
Easier to justify than A's going all in without any betting to give him signals but somewhat questionable in my view.
L: has hit a full house Aces and 8's.
He raises to 12 million.
At this point he should know that he could be beaten by a straight flush or, and this is important, a higher full house.
It is possible another player could be holding an Ace and an 8 in which case L loses to an Aces and 8's full house.
Given that two players have gone all in that would have to be a serious possibility.
So, L raises to 12 million, a reasonable play to test whether Bond has a higher full house or a straight flush, although a questionable gamble with respect to A and B.
Bond goes all in for 40 million after all he can't lose and L calls him.
This seems like a major error on L's part.
Not because he loses, which happens, but because he calls Bond when he knows there are at least two hands which are possible which could beat him, and Bond appears to be check raising him.
So although Bond appears to play the hand well after he hits his straight flush I'm not sure the odds indicated he was playing it well before the screenwriters dealt him one L seems to me to be playing a very dumb game of poker.
Anyway, I got a kick out of breaking this down even dealt the hands out and I'm quite the average amateur so if anyone else casino titan poker live a poker buff has any thoughts on this, I'd be interested.
Though I'm glad Bond won on a straight flush than say, a royal flush.
That would have ruined the game, IMO.
He must've had an incredible hunch.
I believe he checks once he hits the straight flush.
There's no way possible he can lose I think you mentioned this.
He must've had an incredible hunch.
I believe he checks once he hits the straight flush.
There's no way possible he can lose I think you mentioned this.
He must have thought someone had a strong hand.
Plays are often determined by the circumstances, player personalities.
Interesting thread btw MHazzard.
I'm sure poker pros think the movie has an element of cheese but that's ok.
It's not made for pros but rather to be audience friendly.
Bond's big "mistake" which broke him out wasn't such a bad play; an all in call with A high fh?
Not bad at all.
I'd call that every day and twice on sunday.
Not because he loses, which happens, but because he calls Bond when he knows there are at least two hands which are possible which could beat him, casino royale poker hands Bond appears to be check raising him.
Yeah, this does seem to be pretty stupid, especially if Bond did check the round before.
All that checking followed only by calling is either the sign of a complete casino royale poker hands which Le Chiffre knows Bond is not or someone afraid of scaring away a sure thing.
However, for all the flaws of each player's strategy, I can forgive the unrealistic liberties taken.
First of all, it's a movie which isn't even about the game, and I know they have to use it, usually in pieces like the final handto build suspense and provide an interesting new battlefield for the hero and villain to duke it out.
The thrill of the game and status associated with the ability to even participate is payoff enough for some of the losers, so making suboptimal choices isn't as big a deal for them.
Lastly, I can partially excuse Le Chiffre's errors as the result of a man who's finally started to sweat and fear his quite possibly impending death, casino royale poker hands to the persistence and resourcefulness of this man, Bond.
Even the most mathematically astute card players sometimes fall victim to the psychological warfare, as I would read article Le Chiffre did.
That said, although I think those are all good rationalizations, I would have preferred they weren't necessary.
I don't know if they did this or not, but maybe it would've been best had they studied footage of other high-stakes poker games and simply reenacted the appropriate hands.
Well, anyone who plays poker on a semi-regular basis will tell you that they had near-impossibly flawless hands.
Though I'm glad Bond won on a article source flush than say, a royal flush.
That would have ruined the game, IMO.
Well, I think only the straight flush was really that much of a monster hand, and although the likelihood of all four remaining players having such good hands at the same time is slim, it's something one does see every so often in poker tournaments.
Plus, this is a movie, so one in a million odds are routine.
He must've had an incredible hunch.
I believe he checks once he hits the straight flush.
There's no way possible he can lose I think you mentioned this.
It's a check-raise, intended to lure Le Chiffre in for the kill.
The only thing I'd be surprised by is if Le Chiffre fell for it twice, as the OP suggests was a possibility.
Agreed about the 9-2, though.
Bond's big "mistake" which broke him out wasn't such a bad play; an all in call with A high fh?
Not bad at all.
I'd call that every day and twice on sunday.
He must've had an incredible hunch.
The only thing I'd be surprised by is if Le Chiffre fell for it twice, as the OP suggests was a possibility.
Agreed about the 9-2, though.
I see, but it must take some serious skill and restraint to not bet on a straight flush.
That's just me, and that's probably why I'm not a professional.
The only thing I'd be surprised by is if Le Chiffre fell for it twice, as the OP suggests was a possibility.
Agreed about the 9-2, though.
I see, but it must take some serious skill and restraint to not bet on a straight flush.
That's just me, and that's probably why I'm not a professional.
I think checking would be far too suspicious given those circumstances, and Bond could have bet without running Le Chiffre out of that hand.
He's lucky Le Chiffre was overconfident or wasn't thinking straight.
I'd reccomend it for anyone interested in Poker.
It's not going be a cult classic like Rounders but still entertaining and set in Vegas.
The only thing I'd be surprised by is if Le Chiffre fell for it twice, as the OP suggests was a possibility.
Agreed about the 9-2, though.
I see, but it must take some serious skill and restraint to not bet on a straight flush.
That's just me, and that's probably why I'm not a professional.
I think checking would be far too suspicious given those circumstances, and Bond could have bet without running Le Chiffre out of that hand.
He's lucky Le Chiffre was overconfident or wasn't thinking straight.
What gets me is not that Bond checks twice, because it would make sense for him, once he knows he has an unbeatable hand, to try to lure LeChiffre into going all in, since his goal is not just to make money in which case he might bet and try to get players to drop out but to bankrupt LeChiffre.
In any case, I am fully aware that this is a fictional game, requiring dramatic constraints, so we should probably be grateful that it makes any sense at all.
In fairness to the screenwriters, it's no worse than Flemings tendency to give Bond improbable winning hands, natural or otherwise in baccarat.
I think the most interesting fact, and the one that got me going analyzing this in the first place was the realization that Bond had to know he couldn't lose before LeChiffre lays down his cards.
That's what made me want to watch the scene again to see what Craig's mannerisms indicated, if anything.
By the way, I'm very much the amateur poker player but most of my analysis of Hold Em Strategy comes from Phil Helmuth's very readable book "Play Poker Like the Pros".
I'm also working on Doyle Brunsons "Super System 1" which is also good but much harder to digest.
Anyway, thanks for all your very interesting comments so far.
The only thing I'd point out is the varying chip stacks at the table, and the fact that we don't know what the blinds are.
The two besides LeChiffre that went all in with losing hands may have been about to be blinded out, and were unlikely to see as strong a hand in the near future.
Same goes for Le Chiffre--in tournament poker, in the final stages, A-6 is not card cool covers poker bad a starting hand.
Tournament poker is a different animal--everything is compressed.
At a regular game, if the cards aren't running your way, you can go home and come back the next day.
In a tournament, you have to "make a move" sometimes with cards that you normally wouldn't play.
As a result, luck plays a bigger part in tournament poker than in regular "grinder" games.
The only thing I can suggest is that, based on Le Chiffre's comment' "I'll take you up on that", he obviously feels that he has the best hand.
Since LC plays by statistics he was probably thinking two things: 1 it was highly casino royale poker hands that someone could make a straight flush and 2 most people would likely fold on a 5 and 7, suited or not, rather than chase a straight or flush, especially with an ace on the board and four players in.
I would assume that some betting went on before the scene starts at that point the pair of 8's was probably looking pretty good, so I can't imagine him checkingso the fact that Bond stayed in probably told Le Chiffre that Bond was holding onto a possible flush or full house.
Still not particularly well played, and his confidence at the end is more than a little unfounded.
From an entertainment standpoint, assuming the majority of the audience aren't really that familiar with the game, it does kind of milk the suspense when Bond flips his cards "Oh, look!
He only has a 5 and 7 and the bad guy has an ACE!
The dealer does make a considerable effort to spell it out.
My knowledge of poker is very limited.
Which is why I don't gamble.
But I found the characters' reactions to the game very interesting to watch.
I thought Bond limped in as one of the two blinds which is a reasonable play.
He saw a board that agreed with him potentially and stayed in, got the nuts and won.
I didn't think he was cocky or self satisfied.
I didn't see a Roger Moore-Brosnan-esque look of absolute belief that I will win because I'm Bond and I never loose.
And I like that he didn't gloat or say something like "oops" or turn his cards over the way Le chifre showed the JJs.
I think he felt the knot in his stomach and was just relieved to win.
I liked that about this new Bond.
He behaves like a real person but is still cool as we want him to be.
I like the way Bond played it what little we saw anyway.
Looks like Bond read him right before even meeting him.
The only thing I'd point out is the varying chip stacks at the table, and click to see more fact that we don't know what the blinds are.
The two besides LeChiffre that went all in with losing hands may have been about to be blinded out, and were unlikely to see as strong a hand in the near future.
Same goes for Le Chiffre--in tournament poker, in the final stages, A-6 is not that bad a starting hand.
Tournament poker is a different animal--everything is compressed.
At a regular game, if the cards aren't running your way, you can go home and come back the next day.
In a tournament, you have to "make a move" sometimes with cards that you normally wouldn't play.
As a result, luck plays a bigger part in tournament poker than in regular "grinder" games.
A good point about this being a tournament game and one I hadn't considered in terms of playing weaker hands than one might otherwise.
In response to some other postings I am assuming based on betting order that Bond was the small blind and the Asian gentleman next to him was the big blind, although I think someone correct me if I'm wrong that if this was being played normally, Bond having been called by LeChiffre would be the first not the last to lay down his hand, but I excuse dramatic necessity for this.
You are obviously not familiar with Montenegrin https://chakefashion.com/poker/table-poker-convertible.html.

🖐 YouTube

Software - MORE
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Last poker hand in Casino Royale (2006). Fun. Casino Royale Poker Face. 2:45. Casino Royale Poker Face.


Enjoy!
James Bond Poker Play in "Casino Royale" 2006 - Poker - Gambling - Page 1 - Forums - Wizard of Vegas
Valid for casinos
Baccarat (card game) - Wikipedia
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Instead, the hand ends disastrously.
In this hand there are also three straddles.
Former European champion Casino royale poker hands Kabrhel is first to act.
Hand Analysis Maximizing profit and minimizing losses in spots when you have the worst hand are two of the main goals in cash games.
There's nothing unusual pre-flop.
Hanna makes an interesting decision on casino royale poker hands flop.
With a Royal Flush draw and a gutshot, he wants to build the pot.
Dream Comes True on Turn The turn makes a dream come true.
It also gives Kabrhel top pair.
He can now carry on betting and should be able to get more money in the pot.
Hanna seems to be missing a couple of key factors here.
He raised under the gun and called casino royale poker hands flop.
The river can be a card that kills the action.
Hanna has only put about a third 888 poker his stack into the pot but he has a hand that wants to go all-in on the river.
The Worst Possible Card on the River So, the turn bet should have been considerably higher.
On the river he could then casino royale poker hands gone casino royale poker hands comfortably and he would have given Kabrhel good pot odds for a go here />Hanna decides not to bet and give Kabrhel the chance to bluff.
Actually, he should have led out with a small bet here as this would have given Kabrhel a better chance to bluff.
Also, it would often get called as Kabrhel has to give his opponent the ace of hearts to believe he was value-betting.
This mistake comes back to bite him on the river, when the worst possible card literally brings the action to a halt.
We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our website.
By browsing our website, you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies.

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

last poker hand in casino royale. 19 Dec 2013 - 19 secKom Vinn på 888 Online Casino: http://sv.888.com/ . jouer au Poker contre le casino ! 04 . Casino Royale.


Enjoy!
Access to this page has been denied.
Valid for casinos
The Rules of Poker | Being James Bond
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
007 James Bond's Last Poker Hand in Casino Royale

A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

I was intrigued following my review of Skyfall when commenter Enkidum said that the implausibilties in this film pale “in comparison to the final.


Enjoy!
I Expect You To Die!: The Poker of Casino Royale--Meadowlark Lemon?!?
Valid for casinos
The Rules of Poker | Being James Bond
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Casino Royale Poker Scene

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

The Casino Royale Poker Scene – Great Entertainment but Mixed Realism. of Spades, giving him a Flush – the fifth strongest hand in Poker.


Enjoy!
Famous Hand Histories from the Movies: Rounders, Casino Royale, and Maverick - Part Time Poker
Valid for casinos
The Five Worst Poker Scenes in Cinema | Casino Parties
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Keith Woernle in On September 8, 2016, 9:07 am Casino royale poker hands Hand Histories from the Movies: Rounders, Casino Royale, and Maverick While poker hands in motion pictures often get sensationalized to say the least ; watching poker on the big screen is still always a treat.
The result: famous poker hand histories from the movies.
Mike McD has requested TIME.
Mike McD: Alright, your 15 plus I have another 33 to raise you.
Teddy KGB: : 2.
Fukutu finished the tournament in 3rd place.
LeChiffre finished the tournament in 2nd place.
Dealer: The tournament is over.
All your dreams poof dashed.
Your fate is sitting right beside you.
That ace could not have helped you.
I bet it all.
I flopped the nut straight.
Take him down, Teddy!
Mike McD: Well, you casino royale poker hands satisfied now, Teddy?
click the following article I can go on bustin u up all night.
Teddy KGB: Nyet, nyet.
denver poker that man his money.
Teddy KGB has left the table.
Mike McD: ; Keith Woernle is a writer, comedian, and semi-pro poker player based out of New Jersey.
He was a producer for season 10 of the World Poker Tour.
He won a WSOP circuit ring in 2011.
He casino royale poker hands poker a lot.
Follow or contact him on twitter WoernlePoker.
Keith Woernle: Keith Woernle he's the one on the left is a writer, comedian, and semi-pro poker player based out of New Jersey.
He was a producer for season 10 of the World Poker Tour.
He won a WSOP circuit ring in 2011.
He likes poker a lot.
Follow or contact him on twitter WoernlePoker.
If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 800.
Citizens Please Note: Information contained within is for news and entertainment purposes only.
Any use of this information in violation of any federal, state, or local laws is prohibited.
Harrah's does not sponsor or endorse, and is not associated or affiliated with PartTimePoker.