🎰 Tournaments | The Official Global Poker Index - GPI Rankings

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days πŸ’

Filter:
Sort:
JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Veronica Brill who brought the Stones Gambling Hall cheating controversy to light, opens up on how she knew Mike Postle was cheating.


Enjoy!
Tournaments | The Official Global Poker Index - GPI Rankings
Valid for casinos
Stones Gambling Hall Suspends All Poker Broadcasts Following Alleged Cheating | PokerNews
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Postle has been a stones gambling hall poker on "Stones Live," a live poker game streamed on Twitch.
His success in the game has raised eyebrows.
The original accusations were made by Veronica Brill, another poker player who has played with Postle on "Stones Live.
Brill has no specific accusation of what Postle is doing and even admits that she can't be sure he is cheating.
So why does she think he is cheating?
His results are too good, according to Brill.
She said and several professional pokers players who talked to CNBC, agreed no one could do as well as he has, for as long as he has, on these stones gambling hall poker https://chakefashion.com/gambling/casinorpg-sign-in.html />Postle has not yet responded to CNBC's request for comment.
He has defended himself on Twitter as well as on a poker podcast, saying "it is absolutely impossible for me to be doing what they're claiming.
It is 1000% impossible.
Poker pro Matt Berkey said that is a win rate of 10 times what the greatest players in the world could be expected to win in the same games.
It's not just that Postle is winning, it's how he's winning, that is drawing suspicion.
Ingram, Berkey and others have spent hours reviewing hands Postle played and found several times where Postle made a fold stones gambling hall poker a call that wouldn't seem "right" but happened to work out in his click here />Berkey said Postle made plays no pro would ever make, and he did stones gambling hall poker often, and they worked.
Poker is a game of incomplete information.
Berkey said Postle played "as if he had perfect information.
In a statement Stones Gambling Hall said: "We temporarily halted all broadcasts from Stones.
We have also, as a result, halted the use of RFID playing cards.
At this point, there is no specific allegation, no "smoking gun" read more Berkey said.
But many pros are pointing to those RFID cards and the hole card information, saying it's just not possible for Postle to play the way he does and win the way he does.
Β© 2019 CNBC LLC.
Global Business and Financial News, Stocks, Quotes, and Market Data, and Analysis.

BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Professional poker player Mike Postle's abilities have become the. During an online broadcast of a cash game at Stones Gambling Hall inΒ ...


Enjoy!
Editorial: Arrest Postle, Shut Down the Card Room, But End the Ongoing Situation - Poker News Daily
Valid for casinos
403 Forbidden
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
The hours are very inconsistent.
Changing from week to week.
No paid time off.
Stones was by far one of my favorite employers.
The restaurant staff was solid and experienced in stones gambling hall poker volume situations.
From day one I was welcomed with open arms.
The only negative I would say is the background check process.
They do a live scan through the citrus heights police department for the gaming license.
So stones doesn't have the last say.
Hence the reason I'm no longer employed with stones.
When I went in for my live scan spoke with the Sargent that handles it for stones.
I was up front and honest about my past.
With the mistakes I made in my twenties.
I was told as long as I have no violence or fraud I will be ok.
Besides the issue I had with the Chpd live here This was a a great company to work with.
I would highly recommend working at stones gambling Hall Stones is an okay place to work doing security there was actually exciting and a bit amusing they always have events so there was always room for overtime.
Was ok for a short term job, no room for advancing, and everyone was cut throat, for what i will never know.
If you are not a dealer, then you should just keep lookibg somewhere else.
They make officers pay.
Tell on co-worker environment.
New people barely last 2 weeks.
If you live a fake this web page this place is perfect for you.
The hours are good, but they dont work with your schedule.
Maybe they will stones gambling hall poker you become a favorite.
Come in with confidence and they will gut you stones gambling hall poker />Working at Stones was an experience.
The constant favoritism and unequal division of labor made me regret leaving my previous employer to work there.
I stones gambling hall poker never worked at a smaller casino till Stones and it definitely left a bad taste in my mouth.
I love Stones Gambling Hall, but there is no room for growth.
I would love to stay with this employer if they took better care of it's employees.
All employees stones gambling hall poker good people, but need better assistance and pay Management was degrading and I was promised that I would be moved up in the company and they did not keep their promise.
I worked extremely hard while the people who were lazy seemed to be celebrated.
Not a good environment.
Good people to work with.
Cant complain at all.
Good management, and consistent hours.
Also hr is easy to keep in touch with, cause there connected to the building.
The stones gambling hall poker environment is a very dynamic and requires a stones gambling hall poker level of customer service.
You need to be very comfortable with working with the public and willing to put their needs first.
At first it was a job I needed so that i could make ends meet but then it became my life and something I honestly enjoyed doing.
I highly recommend this job to anyone looking to work in any card room or casino.
Cool place to work as a server, chill environment, good people, pretty good tips.
If you love dealing and don't care about anything else this is the best place to work Stones gambling hall is a fast paced workplace with a wonderful selection of coworkers and a management team that is constantly striving for the best and most proficient work methods.
The level of service to their employees continues to go above and beyond my expectations for any well managed gambling resort.
It's a basic job cleaning a facility each night.
With customers it's expected to handling filth they leave behind although with employees from other departments it's rather annoying cleaning up after them in the break room.
Its a fun place to work at, but i wouldn't consider it as a "career" job.
Great experience with an amazing team of people.
The only reason I would leave the Stones was a move out of state.
Excellent management that provided the kind of environment that was actually enjoyable for the employees.
Great Place to work, comfortable environment, not what you would expect from a typical California Card room, superior dining and guest experience Ask a question about seems gambling room escape with or interviewing at Stones Gambling Hall.
Our community is ready to answer.

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Veronica Brill who brought the Stones Gambling Hall cheating controversy to light, opens up on how she knew Mike Postle was cheating.


Enjoy!
Tournaments | The Official Global Poker Index - GPI Rankings
Valid for casinos
Stone's Gambling Hall
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
I think the close distance required for reading the tags might make this difficult, but who knows.
Is it sent via wifi or wired connection?
If wifi, MiTM attacks are situation boyds gambling casinos sorry common.
Everyday there are stories of companies and governments being hacked.
Stones is in driving distance from silicon valley.
For the most part, a lot of what you say is possible, though incredibly unlikely.
MITM attacks rely on mutual authentication.
Whoever is sniffing this data would have to be connected to the same WiFi that the RFID data is being transmitted through.
If this cardroom is transmitting RFID data through the same WiFi as the public WiFi for players, that would be not only incredibly dumb, but a massive vulnerability that could be attacked in more ways than one.
Secondly, this MITM attack would probably be run through a Raspberry Pi with a decent wireless adapter to enter monitoring mode to mimic the initial WiFi β€” this signal would be AWFUL, absolutely unable to transmit enough data packets fast enough for a live stream, and would be glaringly obvious to anyone in that production room.
A Trojan I guess could be possible but unless Postle or his crew has a background in scripting these exploits, it would be easily detected by any basic anti-malware software and probably even Windows Defender.
Even then, a Trojan accessing probably encrypted RFID data is very unlikely as well without hiring a professional third party.
This would have to be connected to some RPi as mentioned above but is possible with enough experience in stones gambling hall poker industry.
In the case were Postle was somehow able to pull this all off, it would be a technological feat nearly unprecedented in poker.
Just to reiterate, the steps would be as follows.
Seems more plausible than what you are describing lol I definitely think thats more plausible.
First, I think you underestimate the ability to monitor wireless traffic, especially if you already know SOME of the details about the network infrastructure.
Kali Linux on a Raspberry Pi can be physically hidden and installed in all sorts of payloads if you wanted to hide it.
Camera bricks for large cameras come to mind.
Give me a day with a RPi and a removeable camera battery and I could deliver a battery that housed all of the above and still functioned for the camera.
Albeit at reduced length of time than stock, haha.
To sniff that traffic and pass it to the intended party AND a rogue agent in a room in which I have some control or knowledge over the infrastructure would be incredibly easy.
Physical devices that can provide a tactile response to digital input are easier still.
All sorts of small scale Bluetooth vibrators and the apps that control them are commonplace.
I also think you article source the security staff.
I can tell that we're probably in similar fields.
I would say that my way is catered to someone who has never done a physical penetration test before, let alone any social engineering to skip some of the security details.
I know that sniffing traffic is pretty easy and there's a ton of open source applications that can do it, but under the assumption that the card data is encrypted it could be nearly impossible to get access to that information, at least in a timely enough manner such that it could be readily used for each street of action.
While Kali on RPi is wildly easy to set up, I find it completely implausible that this is something he took the time to do in the first place and if he has ZERO netsec experience, maneuvering the terminal to do what he wants to do is not an easy task, even just simple commands.
Completely agree that the security staff probably stinks.
I think we can both agree though that there is no way this stones gambling hall poker took the measures to execute either of our ideas to intercept RFID traffic.
Someone was just texting him the cards!
Maybe using that app that you were talking about.
I mean perhaps the RFID readers are transmitting wirelessly to some access point in the peek room and he's picking up on that.
If you work in cyber, you know things are often not nearly as secure as they could be.
Would love to do a teardown of that poker table.
Not sure if it's convincing enough or not, but one thing worth noting That lots of people in the 2+2 thread don't seem to get : Being a superuser doesn't mean you'll always pick the decision that earns you the most money.
Some people in the 2+2 thread think that because at some point he made a play that could've cost him a few hundred bucks it's proof he's not cheating.
But making the other play would totally expose him as a cheater.
Even if you know you beat him.
Apparently not everyone gets that.
Yes those people have obviously never tried to cheat before.
No winning player takes these spazz lines at the frequencies he does and when he takes them his opponents are always weak.
He does shit like check overcall 76 on T53, overcall a J turn, then lead a 3 river all in when both of his opponents miss stones gambling hall poker flush draws.
Flop was like 7 ways btw so he was against super strong ranges.
He click to see more bet bet massive overbet jam vs Bart Hanson when he has air and Hanson has JJ on AAQ-3-T.
Postle never punts into the nuts.
His opponents are always weak when he spazzes.
Several times there were "graphical errors" to explain Mike's play.
Having a graphical error when a play doesn't make any sense is pretty convenient.
I've played with the guy a couple times.
There always were a few hands that made you go "Man this guy is amazing", but usually they were in small spots.
Look at the body of evidence as a whole is pretty astounding.
I think there's enough retarded lines and inconsistencies in his tendencies to have people look into it, but I don't think it's fair to just blast someone as a cheater to the internet, especially when you're accusing someone behind the scenes as a co-conspirator.
If someone behind the scenes is helping, then you're questioning not only the legitamacy of a player, but the game itself since people have to start questioning who else is involved.
Nothing in the videos confirms he's cheating.
Do it the right way, don't start a witch hunt.
What winning player does this???
T53 7 way flop.
He check overcalls 76 check overcalls a J turn and leads a 3 all in when both of his opponents miss their flush draws.
He are responsible gambling awareness week bc think bet bet check call with with 88 vs TT on 994-T-8.
Who plays river as a check call there???
He opens pre, calls a 3 bet, then check call flop check jam turn with 52o vs 92 on T63 all diamonds, turn 2x.
He then makes the nittiest just calls ever.
Get the fuck out.
No winning player takes these lines.
Here is my favorite.
Just floats a gutter in a bomb pot a million ways, overcalls turn and leads river all in when both of his opponents miss their draws: Stones gambling hall poker 41 minutes.
I would believe he is a whale stones gambling hall poker no crusher does this consistently and wins.
And Veronica Brill is the one calling him out?
Could it be that as a player, she doesn't understand how he could make some of those plays, and as a commentator, she's given a soapbox to stand on?
Her hand analysis on Stones are not very good.
I watched about an hour of the suspicious hands and a lot of them remind me of a v strong player going against weak opponents with bad body language.
I see a lot of people who seem to be playing way above the stakes they should be playing live.
This is a televised high stakes NL game.
Did you see A2?
But then he gets 3bet and clicks it back?
You can do that if you hate money or know that V has 9 high.
Yeah, I saw that.
It happens in poker, especially live.
Nearly every hand they play on there is unrealistic when viewed through an online lens.
Calling a raise preflop w Q4s out of position stones gambling hall poker way to the flop.
There are people on there who look like they should be losing 5-10NL players.
Leveling is common between regs.
I just saw a player who just looks stronger than the ones around him.
This is a pretty glaring example.
Normally people would just realize their 72o bluff attempt failed.
The flop is terrible for everything except Ax and QQ, which is a small of combos.
I love the way your expression changes.
First 30 seconds of tanking you're like "damn I'm so dead here".
Then 30 seconds in you're like, but am I really?.
And then right before you call the look on your face, it's like you unlocked The Holy Grail or something.
HART BANSON 4 PRES.
This hand against Mike is probably one of my favorites I have ever played.
Going into this stream there was a lot of chatter between myself and the stones staff because I had been asking to play with him.
I played the show before but I told Justin let me know a date Mike is going to play and I will be there.
Once we got a date set up I started hearing more about the scandal from some of my friends Squishmytomato and Bart.
During the game itself, I had the stream up on my phone listening to the audio so I could hear how Mike was playing certain hands to see if he was continuing his pattern of blowing people off hands.
Once he jammed the river on me I knew I was never folding but was playing the hand back in my head to see if it fit his pattern.
What was your thought process in this hand?
Was there any rumors about his cheating at the time, and is it possible that that factored in at all?
This hand against Mike is probably one of my favorites I have ever played.
Going into this stream there was a lot of chatter link myself and the stones staff because I had been asking to play with him.
I played the show before but I told Justin let me know a date Mike is going to play and I will be there.
Once we got a date set up I started hearing more about the scandal from some of my friends Squishmytomato and Bart.
During the game itself, I had the stream up on my phone listening to the audio so I could hear how Mike was playing certain hands to see if he was continuing his pattern of blowing people off hands.
Once he jammed the river on me I knew I was never folding but was playing the hand back in my head to see if it fit his pattern.
My mistake about preflop action.
So your range is wider than I thought including more Qx and smalller PP and suited aces but has fewer big hands probably no QQ otherwise you 4 bet often.
The post flop action is what I thought it was though - and I think checking 3 streets to him makes it pretty unlikely you have a strong enough hand to call a river shove.
Your hand looks like Qx or pocket pair, maybe a weak suited ace but there are only 2 left.
I 3-bet and then bet flop, turn and river.
Wtf do you think I have?
The hands that people are watching are cherry picked to be the most suspicious.
What do you make of it?
Your a better player than me, but I'm assuming that the idea is that he shouldn't be bluffing unless he knew you had a weak hand?
But if that's the case then why would you call him unless you think he's capable of making bad decisions.
And if he's capable of bad decisions then a heater of making bad decisions at the right time becomes plausible.
I don't know, I'm just surprised so many people are so sure that he is cheating.
The other thread says it's confirmed he's up click here bb over 15 hours of play, but I assume fishy stuff has been going on longer than that?
I like Mike, were friendly in person but I do believe there is something fishy going on.
In that spot his play was perfect against my exact hand.
The guys over at crush live poker have been helping Joey go through old streams to get the approximate figures he is up during the streams.
As of right now he is absolutely crushing the game to the level of the 99th percentile.
Damn, I just started reading the 2p2 thread blocked at work and I'm convinced.
I always get the feeling Joey sensationalizes everything and I wanted to be rational.
Realistically people have to be in the 99th percentile win rate sometimes, but this is fucking nutty shit.

A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Stones Gambling Hall in Citrus Heights contact details.


Enjoy!
Tournaments | The Official Global Poker Index - GPI Rankings
Valid for casinos
Access Denied
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
I think the close distance required for reading the tags might make this difficult, but who knows.
Is it sent via wifi or wired connection?
If wifi, MiTM attacks are fairly common.
Everyday there are stories of companies and governments being hacked.
Stones is in driving distance from silicon valley.
For the most part, a lot of what you say is possible, though incredibly unlikely.
MITM attacks rely on mutual authentication.
Whoever is sniffing this data would have to be connected to the same WiFi that the RFID data is being transmitted through.
If this cardroom is transmitting RFID data through the same WiFi as the public WiFi for players, that would be not only incredibly dumb, but a massive vulnerability that could be attacked in more ways than one.
Secondly, this MITM attack would probably be run through a Raspberry Pi with a decent wireless adapter to enter monitoring mode to mimic the initial WiFi β€” this signal would be AWFUL, absolutely unable to transmit enough data packets fast enough for a live stream, and would be glaringly obvious to anyone in that production room.
A Trojan I guess could be possible but unless Postle or his crew has a background in scripting these exploits, it would be easily detected by any basic anti-malware software and probably even Windows Defender.
Even then, a Trojan accessing probably encrypted RFID data is very unlikely as well without hiring a professional third party.
This would have to be connected to some RPi as mentioned above but is possible with enough experience in the industry.
In the case were Postle was somehow able to pull this all off, it would be a technological feat nearly unprecedented in poker.
Just to reiterate, the steps would be as follows.
Seems more plausible than what you are describing lol I definitely think thats more plausible.
First, I think you underestimate the ability to monitor wireless traffic, especially if you already know SOME of the details about the network infrastructure.
Kali Linux on a Raspberry Pi can be physically hidden and installed in all sorts of payloads if you wanted to hide it.
Camera bricks for large cameras come to learn more here />Give me a day with a RPi and a removeable camera battery and I could deliver a battery that housed all of the above and still functioned for the camera.
Albeit at reduced length of time than stock, haha.
To sniff that traffic and pass it to the intended party AND a rogue agent in a room in which I have some control or knowledge over the infrastructure would be incredibly easy.
Physical devices that can provide a tactile response to digital input are easier still.
All sorts of small scale Bluetooth vibrators and the apps that control them are commonplace.
I also think you overestimate the security staff.
I can tell that we're probably in similar fields.
I would say that my way is catered to someone who has never done a physical penetration test before, let alone any social engineering to skip some of the security details.
I know that sniffing traffic is pretty easy and there's a ton of open source applications that can do it, but under the assumption that the card data is encrypted it could be nearly impossible to get access to that information, gambling ny least in a timely enough manner such that it could be readily used for each street industry russia gambling in action.
While Kali on RPi is wildly easy to set up, I find it completely implausible that this is something he took the time stones gambling hall poker do in the first place and if he has ZERO netsec experience, maneuvering the terminal to do what he wants to do is not an easy task, even just simple commands.
Completely agree that the security staff probably stinks.
I think we can both agree though that there is no way this guy took the measures to execute either of our ideas to intercept RFID traffic.
Someone was just texting him the cards!
Maybe using that app that you were talking about.
I mean perhaps the RFID readers are transmitting wirelessly to some access point in the peek room and he's picking up https://chakefashion.com/gambling/sports-betting-vs-gambling.html that.
If you work in cyber, you know things are often not nearly as secure as they could be.
Would love to do a teardown of that poker table.
Not sure if it's convincing enough or not, but one thing worth noting That lots of people in the 2+2 gambling stock options don't seem to get : Being a superuser doesn't mean you'll always pick the decision that earns you the most money.
Some people in the 2+2 thread think that because at some point he made a play that could've cost him a few hundred bucks it's proof he's not cheating.
But making the other play would totally expose him as a cheater.
Even if you know you beat him.
Apparently not everyone gets that.
Yes those people have obviously never tried to cheat before.
No winning player takes these spazz lines at the frequencies he does and when he takes them his opponents are always weak.
He does shit like check overcall 76 on T53, overcall a J turn, then lead a 3 river all in when both of his opponents miss their flush draws.
Flop was like 7 ways btw so he was against super strong ranges.
He goes bet bet massive overbet jam vs Bart Hanson when he has air and Hanson has JJ on AAQ-3-T.
Postle never punts into the nuts.
His opponents are always weak when he spazzes.
Several times there were "graphical errors" to explain Mike's play.
Having a graphical error when a play doesn't make any sense is pretty convenient.
I've played with the guy a couple times.
There always were a few hands that made you go "Man this guy is amazing", but usually they were in small spots.
Look at the body of evidence as a whole is pretty astounding.
I think there's enough retarded lines and inconsistencies in his tendencies to have people look into it, but I don't think it's fair to just blast someone as a cheater to the internet, especially when you're accusing someone behind the scenes as a co-conspirator.
If someone behind the scenes is helping, then stones gambling hall poker questioning not only the legitamacy of a player, but the game itself since people have to start questioning who else is involved.
Nothing in the videos confirms he's cheating.
Do it the right way, don't start a witch hunt.
What winning player does more info />T53 7 way flop.
He check overcalls 76 check overcalls a J turn and leads a 3 all in when both of his opponents miss their flush draws.
He goes bet bet check call with with 88 vs TT on 994-T-8.
Who plays river as a check call there???
He opens pre, calls a 3 bet, then check call flop check jam turn with 52o vs 92 on T63 all diamonds, turn 2x.
He then makes the nittiest just calls ever.
Get the fuck out.
No winning player takes these lines.
Here is my favorite.
Just floats a gutter in a bomb pot a million ways, overcalls turn and leads river all in when both of his opponents miss their draws: At 41 minutes.
I would believe he is a whale but no crusher does this consistently and wins.
And Veronica Brill in biloxi gambling the one calling him out?
Could it be that as a player, she doesn't understand how he could make some of those plays, and as a commentator, she's given a soapbox to stand on?
Her hand analysis on Stones are not very good.
I watched about an hour of the suspicious hands and a lot of them remind me of a v strong player going against weak opponents with bad body language.
I see a lot of people who seem to be playing article source above the stakes they should be playing live.
This is a televised high stakes NL game.
Did you see A2?
But then he gets 3bet and clicks it back?
You can do that if you hate money or know that V has 9 high.
Yeah, I saw that.
It happens in poker, especially live.
Nearly every hand they play on there is unrealistic when viewed through an online lens.
Calling a raise preflop w Q4s out of position 4 way to the flop.
There are people on there who look like they should be losing 5-10NL players.
Leveling is common between regs.
I just saw a player who just looks stronger than the ones around him.
This is a pretty glaring example.
Normally people would just realize their 72o bluff attempt failed.
The flop is terrible for everything except Ax and QQ, which is a small of combos.
I love the way your expression changes.
First 30 seconds stones gambling hall poker tanking you're like "damn I'm so dead here".
Then 30 seconds in you're like, but am I really?.
And then right before you call the look on your face, it's like you unlocked The Holy Grail or something.
HART BANSON 4 PRES.
This hand against Mike is probably one of my favorites I have ever played.
Going into this stream there was a lot of chatter between myself and the stones staff because I had been asking to play with him.
I played the show before pity, sports gambling legalization pros have I told Justin let me know a date Mike is going to play and I will be there.
Once we got a date set up I started hearing more about the scandal from some of my friends Squishmytomato and Bart.
During the game itself, Stones gambling hall poker had the stream up on my phone listening to the audio so I could hear how Mike was playing certain hands to see if he was continuing his pattern of blowing people off hands.
Once he jammed the river on me I knew I was never folding but was playing the hand back in my head to stones gambling hall poker if it fit his pattern.
What was your thought process in this hand?
Was there any rumors about his cheating at the time, and is it possible that that factored in at all?
This hand against Mike is probably one of my favorites I have ever played.
Going into this stream there was a lot of chatter between myself and the stones staff because I had been asking visit web page play with him.
I played the show before but I told Justin let me know a date Mike is going to play and I will be there.
Once we got a date set up I started hearing more about the scandal from some of my friends Squishmytomato and Bart.
During the game itself, I had the stream up on my phone listening to the audio so I could hear how Mike was playing certain hands to see if he was continuing his pattern of blowing people off hands.
Once he jammed the river on me I knew I was never folding but was playing the hand back in my head to see if it fit his pattern.
My mistake about preflop action.
So your range is wider than I thought including more Qx and smalller PP and suited aces but has fewer big hands probably no QQ otherwise you 4 bet often.
The post flop action is what I thought it was though - and I think checking 3 streets to him makes it pretty unlikely you have a strong enough hand to call a river shove.
Your hand looks like Qx or pocket pair, maybe a weak suited ace but there are only 2 left.
I 3-bet and then bet flop, turn and river.
Wtf do you think I have?
The hands that people are watching are cherry picked to be the most suspicious.
What do you make of it?
Your a better player than me, but I'm assuming that the idea is that he shouldn't be bluffing unless he knew you had a weak hand?
But if that's the case then why would you call him unless you think he's capable of making bad decisions.
And if he's capable of bad decisions then a heater of making bad decisions at the right time becomes plausible.
I don't know, I'm just surprised so many people are so sure that he is cheating.
The other thread says it's confirmed he's up ~1000 bb over 15 hours of play, but I assume fishy stuff has been going on longer than that?
I like Mike, were friendly in person but I do believe there is something fishy going on.
In that spot his play was perfect against my exact hand.
The guys over at crush live poker have been helping Joey go through old streams to get the approximate figures he is up during the streams.
As of right now he is absolutely crushing the game to the level of the 99th percentile.
Damn, I just started reading the 2p2 thread blocked at work and I'm convinced.
I always get the feeling Joey sensationalizes everything and I wanted to be rational.
Realistically people have to be in the 99th percentile win rate sometimes, but this is fucking nutty shit.

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

It's time to play your next hand at The Saloon, located within Stones Gambling Hall, Northern California's newest card house. From the casual player to theΒ ...


Enjoy!
Mike Postle with a PERFECT Bluff - Cheating at Stones Gambling Hall! - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Stones Gambling Hall Suspends All Poker Broadcasts Following Alleged Cheating | PokerNews
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Poker Vloggers Live Stream Cash Game @ Stones Gambling Hall

BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Evaluating how the recent Stones Gambling Hall scandal might impact poker "live streams" and peer-to-peer gambling marketing.


Enjoy!
Reddit - poker - Live Stream Cheating Allegations arise at Stones Gambling Hall
Valid for casinos
Stone's Gambling Hall
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Record $18.5k pot in a $1$3 NLHE game at Stones! *June 2019*

T7766547
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Sacramento poker player Mike Postle and Stones Gambling Hall are named in a $30 million lawsuit accusing.


Enjoy!
Share by facebook
Valid for casinos
Stones Gambling Hall Unifies Security and Surveillance | Genetec
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Stones Gambling Hall scandal analysis and stones gambling hall poker />This article contains observations partially derived from a PokerStaples YouTube video featuring Jaime Staples and Jeff Gross.
On September 28th, poker player publicly revealed long-held suspicions that fellow Stones Live Poker contestant Mike Postle was somehow cheating competitors out of real money in licensed games that were being broadcast live from Stones Gambling Hall in California.
Through the investigative and public relations effort put forth by Poker Life Podcast host β€” thousands of poker fans worldwide have found themselves motivated to painstakingly review days-upon-days of video footage from the now-cancelled show.
The archived videos lead many in the poker world to conclude that multiple poker players were directly victimized in real money poker games that originated within Stones Gambling Hall from 2018-2019.
So answering the all-important question of Were players cheated?
Yet the scandal has left some in the poker world fearing that statewide U.
Are major poker marketing restrictions coming to regulated U.
How might the Stones Gambling Hall scandal impact poker marketing within licensed U.
Stones Gambling Hall Scandal to Impact Poker Live Streams?
We need to have content on Twitch.
We need to have content on YouTube.
This is essential to the game surviving over the long run.
Whether you have a license.
You sign a contract.
This is the nightmare for this type of stuff.
NOTE: As a general guide, U.
Q: What regulatory actions do you anticipate as a result of the ongoing Stones Gambling sites Poker scandal?
If any regulatory actions do result from the scandal, they will likely be isolated and at the discretion of each state or casino.
Formally authorized live streams and video logs within U.
Nevada would be the state most likely to adjust its data security strategies revolving around poker broadcasts because of high profile PokerGO and World Series of Poker coverage.
California regulators will decide if any changes are needed for poker casts inside commercial cardrooms.
Q: Will the Stones Gambling Hall scandal make more U.
Read our Part Time Poker U.
In other words β€” if high profile poker marketers desire just click for source get ahead of the issues, create a crude regulatory framework and continuously refine it until informal policy can be offered to commercial casino regulatory bodies for merit-based consideration, stones gambling hall poker self-police questionable content in the meantime β€” then it will be poker content creators themselves who will be primarily tasked with creating and attracting funding into said infrastructure.
What about jurisdictions outside the United States, such as casinos in Europe that are regulated by the UK Gambling Commission?
Watch this August 2018 online affiliate marketing segment featuring Ian Sims of UK-based regulatory compliance watchdog service.
Video is really tricky.
Somehow you need transcripts.
The problem with streaming in general is no one really knows what see more streamer is going to say.
Or what it means is the end of operators working stones gambling hall poker streamers.
So I think everyone wants to keep it and see the value in streaming, but it just takes one person to say something stupid and, you know, that could be the end of it.
If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 800.
Citizens Please Note: Information contained within is for news and entertainment purposes only.
Any use of this information in violation of any federal, state, or local laws is prohibited.
Harrah's does not sponsor or endorse, and is not associated or affiliated with PartTimePoker.

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Veronica Brill who brought the Stones Gambling Hall cheating controversy to light, opens up on how she knew Mike Postle was cheating.


Enjoy!
chakefashion.com?v=gaA8K81O4Rw
Valid for casinos
Reddit - poker - Live Stream Cheating Allegations arise at Stones Gambling Hall
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
stones gambling hall poker

JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

newbie. Ashara Dayne's Avatar. Join Date: Aug 2014. Location: Sacramento CA. Posts: 15. Thumbs up Stones Gambling Hall (Sacramento CA)Β ...


Enjoy!
Tournaments | The Official Global Poker Index - GPI Rankings
Valid for casinos
Share by facebook
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
stones gambling hall poker

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

It's time to play your next hand at The Saloon, located within Stones Gambling Hall, Northern California's newest card house. From the casual player to theΒ ...


Enjoy!
Working at Stones Gambling Hall: Employee Reviews | chakefashion.com
Valid for casinos
Stones Gambling Hall Unifies Security and Surveillance | Genetec
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Postle has been a regular on "Stones Live," a live poker game streamed on Twitch.
His success in the game has raised eyebrows.
The stones gambling hall poker accusations were made by Veronica Brill, another poker player who has played with Postle on "Stones Live.
Brill has no specific accusation of what Postle is doing and even admits that she can't be sure he is cheating.
So why does she think he is cheating?
His results are too good, according to Brill.
She said and several professional pokers players who talked to CNBC, agreed no one could do as well https://chakefashion.com/gambling/gambling-anonymous-classes.html he has, for as long as he has, on these livestreamed games.
Postle has not yet responded to CNBC's request for comment.
He has defended himself on Twitter as well as on a poker podcast, saying "it is absolutely impossible for me to be doing what they're claiming.
It is 1000% impossible.
Poker pro Matt Berkey said that is a win rate of 10 times what the greatest players in the world could be expected to win in the same games.
It's not just that Postle is winning, it's how he's winning, that is drawing suspicion.
Ingram, Berkey and others have spent hours reviewing hands Postle played and found several times where Postle made a fold or a call that wouldn't seem "right" but happened to work out in his favor.
Berkey said Postle made plays no pro would ever make, and he did stones gambling hall poker often, and they stones gambling hall poker />Poker is a game of incomplete information.
Berkey said Postle played "as if he had perfect information.
In a statement Stones Gambling Hall said: "We temporarily halted all broadcasts from Stones.
We have also, as a result, halted the use of RFID playing cards.
At this point, there is no specific allegation, no "smoking gun" stones gambling hall poker Berkey said.
But many pros are pointing to those RFID cards and the hole stones gambling hall poker information, saying it's just not possible for Postle to play the way he does and win the way he does.
this web page 2019 CNBC LLC.
Global Business and Financial News, Stocks, Quotes, and Market Data, and Analysis.