🔥 Casino på nett: Bonus og gratisspinn hos norske casinoer med spilleautomater

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🍒

Filter:
Sort:
TT6335644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Casino omtaler av alle norske online casino! ✅ Få freespins ✚ casino bonuser ✚ GRATIS penger på beste casino på nett fra 2020! ➤ Klikk her!


Enjoy!
Casino på nett: Bonus og gratisspinn hos norske casinoer med spilleautomater
Valid for casinos
Redsbet - Sports Betting, Casino, Fantasy
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Test spillene gratis svenske casino sider oss.
Se våre casinoomataler svenske casino sider finn din favoritt.
Velkommen til Kasinonett — Din casinoguide Siden 2008 har vi svenske casino sider dedikert til å være en av norges mest pålitelig kilde av online casinoer og gambling informasjon.
Casinoene som er anbefalet hos oss er nøye undersøkt og testet av oss, slik at du kan føle deg helt trygg når du spiller hos svenske casino sider casinoene.
Hos Kasinonett streber vi alltid etter å kunne tilby deg de beste tilbudene og casinobonusene, vi omtalere også alle casinospill og spilleautomater til våre anbefalte online casinoer.
Om du er ny til casino har vi mange ulike casinoguider og gratis casinospill slik click du kan sette deg godt inn i hvordan du spiller før du svenske casino sider gjør det med ekte penger.
Vi ønsker deg lykke til med ditt neste casino besøk, og husk at vi alltid er der for deg om du skulle ha noen spørsmål rundt spill og.
Siste casinonyheter Nå som høsten er mer enn bare godt i gang er det noe vi alle kan kjenne oss igjen i — kosekveld hjemme med popkorn og en god film.
Dette betyr for deg som ny spiller eller allerede eksisterende spiller kan forvente deg en bursdagskampanje hvor det skal deles ut både iTunes-gavekort, ekstrabonuser og massevis av andre spennende overraskelser som kommer underveis i kampanjen.
Dette er en ny kampanje som kun er tilgjengelig for inviterte gjester.
De inviterte spillerne kan snart ta opp kampen om å vinne flotte pengepremier i den tiden kampanjen er aktiv.
Borte på Spinson Casino er det nettopp freespins som står sentralt og nå er casinoet i ferd med å avslutte en kampanje der det deles ut haugevis av nettopp freespins.
Men du har fremdeles til midnatt til å sikre deg din andel.
Det som er på menyen i denne ukekampanjen er både freespins, bonuser, spill-turneringer eller freespins som du kan vinne på nye spilleautomater som lanseres ved casinoet.
Her finnes mange flotte strender med kritthvit sand, fester, god mat og drikke, massevis av spennende attraksjoner, actionfylte aktiviteter og mye mye annet som kan oppleves.
Men det kommer mer: denne heldige spilleren vant den livsforvandlende jackpotten på sitt første forsøk på et nettcasino!
Vi vil snart sende deg en e-post der du kan aktivere dine gratis spinn, så hold et øye med innboksen riverwind casino

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Casino Online på Casinoservice er best i Norge! Vi tilbyr våre. Den svenske spillutvikleren NetEnt sto bak denne gamle klassikeren. For oss som liker.


Enjoy!
RIKSRETT --- ANMODNING OM BISTAND FRA DANSKE OG SVENSKE MYNDIGHETER
Valid for casinos
Norske nett casino, sjekk ut den beste nett casino og tilbyr her!
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
S01E14 Live Roulette Strategy Of Breaking Even! Roulette System For Online Gamblers! Gambling Tricks

BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Nye Casino er best på Nye-Casino.com! Vi guider deg i jungelen av nye casinoer. Alle nye norske selskapene for casino online!


Enjoy!
404 Not Found
Valid for casinos
Maria Casino Promokode > 200 free spins + 10 % i payback i 2019
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Much more than documents.
Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.
Start Free Trial Cancel anytime.
Folketinget og Den Udenrikspolitiske Nævn, København, Danmark Sveriges Riksdag og Regeringskanseliet, Stockholm, Sverige ANMODNING OM BISTAND FRA DANSKE OG SVENSKE MYNDIGHETER Her i Norge har man for tiden gående en sak hvor sentrale deler av det norske statsapparatet begjæres stilt for riksrett se PDF-vedlegg.
Det dreier seg om en sak hvor det bl.
Flere av forbrytelsene norske stats- og kommuneansatte har begått er av en slik art det er aktuelt å underkaste de skyldige psykiatrisk observasjon i regi av utenlandske eksperter.
Man ber med dette svenske og danske myndigheter om å utøve det press på norske styresmakter som er nødvendig for at nevnte riksrettssak skal kunne avvikles i lovlige og ellers akseptable former.
Werner Winther Wilhelm Werner Winther Sunnmøre politidistrikt Ålesund POLITIANMELDELSE AV HØYESTERETTSDOMMERE I forbindelse med Høyesteretts behandling av HR-2014-01567-U sak nr.
Under riksretten vil man komme nærmere inn på de fatale konsekvensene av de anmeldtes forbrytelser.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Ankegrunnene 1 En dom eller kjennelse kan ankes på grunn av feil i bedømmelsen av faktiske forhold, rettsanvendelsen eller den saksbehandling som ligger til grunn for avgjørelsen.
Saksbehandlingsfeil 1 Feil ved saksbehandlingen skal tillegges virkning hvis det er nærliggende at feilen kan ha hatt betydning for den avgjørelse som er anket.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Man fastslår umiddelbart at grunnlaget for anke etter tvisteloven § 29-3 er rikelig til stede, og presiserer preliminært at: A.
Lagmannsrettens dommere er embetsmenn iht.
Grunnloven § 21, domstolloven § 55, og tjenestemannsloven § 1 mv, B.
Hosstående presisering impliserer at bestemmelsene om ugildhet i domstolloven Kapittel 6 må overholdes når lagmannsretten skal fatte en kjennelse eller behandle en anke over beslutninger som påklages etter tvisteloven § 29-3 mv.
Man gjengir domstolloven Kapittel 6: 6te kapitel.
Ingen kan være dommer eller lagrettemedlem: 1.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Endret ved lover 14 juni 1985 nr.
Den, som er dommer eller lagrettemedlem, kan ikke være sakkyndig i saken.
Den, som er vidne i saken, kan ikke være dommer eller lagrettemedlem, saafremt han har hat noget at forklare, som vedkommer saken.
Hvis en dommer eller et lagrettemedlem forlanges ført som vidne, men ikke har noget at forklare, som vedkommer saken, kan han avgi forklaring herom fra dommersætet.
Under samme betingelse kan retten beslutte, at han skal avgi sin forklaring paa forhaand i et retsmøte, som parterne varsles til.
Beslutningen kan ikke angripes.
Endret ved lover 14 juni 1985 nr.
Dommer eller lagrettemedlem kan heller ikke nogen være, når andre særegne omstendigheter foreligger, som er skikket til å svekke tilliten til hans uhildethet.
Navnlig gjelder dette, når en part av den good super spin casino pity krever, at han skal vike sete.
Endret ved lover 24 juni 1933 nr.
Er domstolens formann eller den tingrettsdommer som har tilsyn med dommerfullmektigen ugild, er også dommerfullmektigen utelukket med mindre partene samtykker i at dommerfullmektigen ikke viker sete.
Endret ved lover 18 des 1987 nr.
Endres ved lov 21 juni 2013 nr.
Ingen som står i et forhold til saken som nevnt i § 106 nr.
§ 61, eller forestå trekning av meddommere eller lagrettemedlemmer.
Side 4 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Det samme gjelder rettsvitner i saker etter gjeldsordningsloven.
Retten kan desuten beslutte, at de tjenestemænd, som her er nævnt, skal fratræde, naar de staar i noget andet av de forhold, som er nævnt i §§ 106 og 107.
Det samme gjælder § 108, hvis nogen av parterne kræver det.
Endret ved lover 27 juni 1986 nr.
En part som vil kræve, at nogen skal utelukkes, bør gjøre det, saasnart han faar vite om det forhold, som begrunder kravet.
Utelukkelse efter § 108 kan han ikke længer kræve, naar han har visst om de særegne omstændigheter, men allikevel har indlatt sig i forhandling for retten.
Kravet fremsættes enten mundtlig eller skriftlig og skal angi de grunde, som det støttes paa.
Naar en enedommer eller leder av retten er i et tilfælde, som er nævnt i § 106 eller § 107, skal han selv træffe de nødvendige forføininger.
Andre tjenestemænd som er i et saadant tilfælde, skal i tide si fra til rettens leder.
Endret ved lov 17 juni 2005 nr.
Finder en dommer, at han er i en stilling, som gir parterne ret til at kræve ham utelukket efter § 108, og forholdet ikke maa antages at være almindelig kjendt, bør han sørge for, at parterne faar vite om det saa snart som mulig.
Har retten flere medlemmer, bør han si fra til rettens leder, som beslutter, hvad der videre skal foretages.
Er et lagrettemedlem, et rettsvitne, en protokollfører eller en annen embets- eller tjenestemann i sådan stilling, skal han si fra til rettens leder.
Endret ved lover 24 juni 1933 nr.
Opphevet ved lov 15 juni 2007 nr.
Side 5 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Før forhandlingen i den enkelte sak begynner, skal rettens leder gjøre lagrettemedlemmene eller meddommerne opmerksom på, at de er utelukket fra å gjøre tjeneste, hvis de er i noget tilfelle som er nevnt i § 106 eller § 107, eller hvis der for deres vedkommende foreligger sådanne omstendigheter som omhandlet i § 108, og han skal opfordre dem og partene til å si fra, hvis det måtte være tilfellet.
Endret ved lover 24 juni 1933 nr.
Ingen dommer må være med å avgjøre om han selv er ugild, dersom retten likevel er domfør.
Heller ikke bør han være med på avgjørelsen når en annen dommer i samme domstol kan tilkalles i hans sted uten vesentlig ulempe eller utgift.
Endret ved lov 18 juni 1971 nr.
Reises spørsmål om utelukking forut for det rettsmøte i Høyesterett hvor saken skal behandles, kan det settes rett til å avgjøre spørsmålet.
Også i andre domstoler kan spørsmål om utelukking avgjøres forut for det rettsmøte hvor saken skal behandles.
I så fall kan rettens leder treffe avgjørelsen alene dersom retten har flere medlemmer, men det kan også settes alminnelig rett til å avgjøre spørsmålet på forhånd når det kan gjøres uten vesentlig ulempe eller utgift.
Er det spørsmål om å utelukke en enedommer eller domstolens leder eller to av domstolens faste medlemmer, kan enedommeren eller lederen beslutte at spørsmålet isteden skal forelegges for den nærmest overordnede domstol, eller for Høyesteretts ankeutvalg dersom saken står for lagmannsretten.
Endret ved lover 18 juni 1971 nr.
Avgjørelsen træffes ved kjendelse, naar utelukkelse besluttes, eller naar en parts begjæring om utelukkelse forkastes.
Er der spørsmaal om at utelukke flere dommere, træffes avgjørelsen særskilt for hver enkelt.
Retten kan beslutte at utelukke en dommer eller anden tjenestemand, uten at parterne er hørt.
Men den, som der er spørsmaal om at utelukke, bør saavidt mulig avkræves erklæring.
Kræver en utelukkelsesgrund nærmere undersøkelse, foretar retten undersøkelsen av eget tiltak.
Handles der om en grund av den art, som er nevnt i § 108, kan retten opfordre vedkommende part til at gjøre nærmere rede for utelukkelsesgrunden og til at gjøre den sandsynlig paa den maate, som retten tillater.
Hvis det findes paakrævet, kan et retsmøte holdes til behandling av spørsmaalet.
Side 6 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Har en part krevd at alle eller de fleste dommerne ved en domstol skal vike sete som ugilde til å delta i behandlingen av en sak, kan den nærmest overordnede domstol, eller Høyesteretts ankeutvalg dersom saken står for lagmannsretten, etter søknad fra domstolens formann beslutte at saken skal overføres til en annen domstol av samme orden.
Den overordnede domstolens avgjørelse kan ikke angripes.
Søkes det om slik overføring etter at en domstol i medhold av bestemmelsene i §§ 116 til 118 har avgjort at alle dommere ved domstolen eller de fleste av dem er utelukket fra å gjøre tjeneste i en sak, kan den overordnede domstolen oppheve kjennelsen dersom den finner at utelukkelsen er besluttet uten gyldig grunn.
Endret ved lover 18 juni 1971 nr.
Hvis den myndighet, som skal opnævne stedfortræder for en utelukket tjenestemand, finder, at utelukkelsen savner grund, kan den anke kjendelsen med opsættende virkning.
Avsiges kjendelsen under hovedforhandling, gjælder dette bare, naar saken allikevel utsættes.
Ellers kan en kjendelse, som avgjør, at nogen er ugild, ikke angripes.
En kjendelse, som negter utelukkelse i de tilfælde, som er nævnt i § 110 tredje led, kan heller ikke angripes.
Endret ved lov 17 juni 2005 nr.
Naar en tjenestemand er i noget av de tilfælde, som er nævnt i §§ 106 og 107, jfr.
§ 110, eller naar en part har krævet ham utelukket, maa han bare foreta saadanne handlinger, som ikke kan opsættes uten væsentlig ulempe.
Hvis utelukkelse er besluttet, og § 119 ikke kommer til anvendelse, skal uten ophold en anden av rettens tjenestemænd eller en varamand tilkaldes eller stedfortræder opnævnes.
Den, som er utelukket, kan foreta saadanne handlinger, som ikke taaler at opsættes.
Side 7 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Brevet har ikke kommet i retur til retten.
Det legges derfor til grunn at brevet er mottatt av Winther.
Ellers fremholdes det at undertegnede ikke har mottatt forsendelser fra Posten Norge BA de siste 10 årene.
Man gjør uavkortet gjeldende at betingelsene i tvisteloven § 13-4 om gyldig fravær i dette tilfellet er oppfylt, og at dette skal tillegges betydning for nærværende anke etter tvisteloven § 29.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
I denne sammenheng understrekes også at Frostating lagmannsrett samt Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet før den fattet påankede kjennelse columbus oh in casino FROS var kjent med at undertegnede 12.
Side 9 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Man legger til grunn som bevist at ovennevnte dommere har hatt et kriminelt ønske om bl.
Følgende dommere ved Frostating lagmannsrett begjæres siktet, tiltalt og straffet for overtredelse av straffeloven § 110: 1.
Jf straffeprosessloven § 1 item Kapittel 18 ib.
Side 10 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Riksretten dømmer i første og siste instans i de saker som Stortinget anlegger mot statsrådets, Høyesteretts eller Stortingets medlemmer for straffbart eller annet rettsstridig forhold når de har brutt sine konstitusjonelle plikter.
De nærmere regler for Stortingets påtale etter denne paragraf fastsettes ved lov.
Dog kan det ikke settes kortere foreldelsesfrist enn 15 år for adgangen til å gjøre ansvar gjeldende ved tiltale for Riksretten.
Dommere i Riksretten er 6 medlemmer valgt av Stortinget og de 5 etter embetsalder eldste, fast utnevnte medlemmer av Høyesterett, deriblant Høyesteretts justitiarius.
Stortinget velger medlemmene og stedfortrederne for 6 år.
Et medlem av statsrådet eller Stortinget kan ikke velges til medlem av Riksretten.
I Riksretten har Høyesteretts justitiarius forsetet.
Den som har tatt sete i Riksretten ocean bets casino valgt av Stortinget, trer ikke ut av retten selv om den tid han eller hun er valgt for, utløper før Riksrettens behandling av saken er tilendebrakt.
Heller ikke en høyesterettsdommer som er medlem av Riksretten, trer ut av retten selv om han eller hun fratrer som medlem av Høyesterett.
Straffebestemmelser og rettergangsmåten som anvendes under riksrettspro- sessen finnes nedfelt i ansvarlighetsloven og riksrettergangsloven : Side 11 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Denne lov får anvendelse på handlinger som påtales ved Riksrett.
Forsåvidt ikke annet følger av denne lov, gjelder bestemmelsene om straff og erstatning i lovgivningen for øvrig ved siden av denne lov, når Statsrådets, Høyesteretts eller Stortingets medlemmer har brutt sine konstitusjonelle plikter.
Opphevet ved lov 30 mars 2007 nr.
For ethvert straffbart forhold som påtales ved Riksrett kan tap av offentlig tjeneste idømmes istedenfor eller som tillegg til den straff som ellers er bestemt.
Som tillegg til den straff som ellers idømmes, kan tap av stemmerett i offentlige anliggender og av adgang til å oppnå offentlig tjeneste idømmes for det tidsrom som retten bestemmer.
Bestemmelsene i denne lovs 2net og 3dje kapittel kommer også til anvendelse på den handling som er forøvet av uaktsomhet, såfremt det ikke uttrykkelig er bestemt at bare den forsettlige handling er straffbar.
Bestemmelsene om foreldelse i den almindelige borgerlige straffelovs 6te kapitel kommer til anvendelse på handlinger som påtales ved Riksrett, dog således at foreldelsesfristen for adgangen til å reise straffesak eller avsi straffedom ikke i noget tilfelle er kortere enn 15 år.
Foreldelsens løp avbrytes ved beslutningen om tiltale, eller ved særskilt beslutning av Stortinget om å iverksette undersøkelser såfremt beslutning om tiltale derefter blir fattet innen 1 år.
Opphevet ved lov 30 mars 2007 nr.
For handling som påtales ved Riksrett kan den ansvarlige tilpliktes å betale erstatning for den skade som er voldt.
Side 12 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Særlige bestemmelser om straffansvar for medlemmer av Statsrådet og Stortinget.
Med bøter eller med hefte eller fengsel inntil 5 år straffes det medlem av Statsrådet som ved handling eller undlatelse bevirker eller medvirker til a at noget som krever beslutning av Stortinget blir foretatt uten Stortingets samtykke; b at en beslutning av Stortinget ikke blir gjennemført, eller at en handling blir foretatt i strid med en stortingsbeslutning; c at protokoller, dokumenter eller oplysninger som skal meddeles Stortinget blir tilbakeholdt, eller at statens regnskaper ikke blir tilstillet Statsrevisjonen således som bestemt i Grunnlovens § 75 bokstav k.
Undlater noget medlem av Statsrådet under behandlingen av en sak å gi oplysninger som har betydning for saken, eller gir han uriktige oplysninger, straffes han med bøter eller med fengsel inntil 5 år.
Det medlem av statsrådet som misligholder sin opplysningsplikt overfor Stortinget, straffes med bøter eller med fengsel inntil 5 år.
Med bøter eller med fengsel inntil 2 https://chakefashion.com/casino/laughlin-casino-promotions.html straffes det medlem av Statsrådet som bevirker eller medvirker til at statens eiendommer eller øvrige midler ikke blir forsvarlig anvendt, eller bestyrt, eller som på annen måte viser uforstand eller forsømmelighet i sin virksomhet.
Den der som medlem av Statsrådet på annen måte enn nevnt i denne lovs øvrige bestemmelser ved handling eller undlatelse bevirker eller medvirker til noget som er stridende mot Grunnloven eller rikets lover, straffes med bøter eller med fengsel inntil 10 år.
Med samme straff straffes de medlemmer av Statsrådet, som forsømmer den dem med hensyn til innkallelse av Stortinget ved Grunnlovens § 39 påliggende plikt.
Det medlem av Stortinget som uten gyldig forfall undlater å møte på Stortinget når dette trer sammen, straffes med bøter.
På samme måte straffes den representant som uten gyldig grunn forsettlig unddrar sig fra å delta i Stortingets forhandlinger eller som ikke retter sig efter Stortingets forretningsorden.
Undlater noget medlem av Stortinget å gi oplysninger som han plikter å meddele Stortinget, eller gir han uriktige oplysninger, straffes han med bøter eller med fengsel inntil 5 år.
Gjør noget medlem av Statsrådet eller av Stortinget sig skyldig i sådan forbrydelse som nevnt i den almindelige borgerlige straffelovs § 121, straffes han med bøter eller med hefte eller fengsel inntil 5 år.
Side 13 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Det medlem av statsrådet som ikke innleverer sin søknad om avskjed i samsvar med Grunnlovens § 15 første ledd, straffes med tap av embetet og bøter eller fengsel inntil 10 år.
På samme måte straffes det medlem av statsrådet som, etter at Stortinget har truffet beslutning om mistillit, overskrider sin bemyndigelse ifølge Continue reading § 15 tredje ledd.
Særlige bestemmelser om straffansvar for medlemmer av Høiesterett og Riksretten.
De medlemmer av Høiesterett, som forsømmer den dem med hensyn til innkallelse av Stortinget ved Grunnlovens § 46 påliggende plikt, straffes med bøter eller med hefte eller fengsel inntil 10 år forsåvidt ikke nogen strengere straffebestemmelse kommer til anvendelse på forholdet.
Det medlem av Høiesterett, som a.
Denne bestemmelse gjelder tilsvarende når et medlem av Høyesterett er medlem av Riksretten.
Opphevet ved lov 30 mars 2007 nr.
Denne lov trer i kraft straks.
Side 14 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Rettsmøtene i Riksretten er offentlige.
Når hensynet til statens forhold til en fremmed makt eller andre særlige hensyn krever det, kan retten beslutte at forhandlingene skal foregå for lukkede dører og at de skal holdes hemmelig.
Forhandling om å utelukke offentligheten foregår for lukkede dører.
Forhandlingene i Riksretten er muntlige.
Over forhandlingene føres en for hver sak innrettet rettsbok, som autoriseres av Stortingets president.
De forklaringer og fremstillinger som den anklagede og forsvareren, anklageren, vidner og sakkyndige gir, gjengis i rettsboken i den utstrekning retten bestemmer.
https://chakefashion.com/casino/lotus-asia-casino-bonus.html kan beslutte at forhandlingene istedenfor å innføres i rettsboken skal optas med de tekniske midler som retten bestemmer, og at de skal trykkes og utgis offentlig.
Riksretten trer sammen i Høyesteretts lokaler.
Foreligger særlige grunner til å holde rettsforhandlingene et annet sted, i eller utenfor rikets hovedstad, kan dette bestemmes av rettens president forsåvidt det første rettsmøte angår, og senere av Riksretten selv.
Blir Riksrettens president kjent ugild, eller har han forfall, trer den efter utnevnelsestiden eldste høiesterettsdommer i hans sted.
Blir et annet av Høyesteretts medlemmer kjent ugild, eller har forfall, trer den neste efter utnevnelsestiden eldste høyesterettsdommer i hans sted.
Blir et av Stortinget valgt medlem kjent ugild eller har forfall, trer en av Riksrettsutvalgets valgte stedfortredere i hans sted etter fastsatt rekkefølge.
Riksrettens president kan bestemme at en eller flere av stedfortrederne etter henholdsvis annet og tredje ledd skal overvære forhandlingene for å tiltre retten om noen av dommerne får forfall.
Som protokollfører ved Riksretten tjenestegjør Høyesteretts direktør.
I stedet for eller ved siden av denne kan presidenten anta en eller flere særskilte protokollførere.
Om ugildhetsgrunner for dommere og protokollførere i Riksretten gjelder forskriftene i lovgivningen om de alminnelige domstoler.
Også den dommer som det er spørsmål om å utelukke som ugild deltar i avgjørelsen.
Side 15 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Har nogen dommer i Riksretten vært fraværende fra et eller flere rettsmøter, avgjør retten om fraværet skal tillegges den betydning at han ikke lenger kan tjenestegjøre som dommer i saken.
I avgjørelsen kan vedkommende dommer ikke selv delta.
Den anklagede innkalles til å møte personlig for Riksretten.
Uteblir han, kan saken allikevel fremmes og pådømmes.
Dog skal saken utsettes, dersom det er oplyst eller sannsynlig at han har gyldig forfall, og retten finner hans nærvær nødvendig av hensyn til oplysningen av saken.
Retten kan bestemme at en anklaget eller domfelt skal undergis fengslig forvaring.
Bevisførsel foregår umiddelbart for Riksretten.
Retten kan dog beslutte at et bevis skal føres gjennem særskilt bevisoptagelse, som i så fall foretas ved tingretten på vedkommende sted efter reglene i tvisteloven.
Anke mot tingrettens avgjørelser går til Riksretten.
Finner Riksretten det hensiktsmessig kan den også bestemme at vidner som innkalles for å avgi forklaring skal avhøres for et utvalg av rettens medlemmer.
Dette utvalg som velges av retten skal i tilfelle ha tre medlemmer, derav én høiesterettsdommer, som tjenestegjør som leder, og to av medlemmene valgt av Stortinget.
Spørsmålet om vidneplikt avgjøres av utvalget, hvis ikke dette finner at avgjørelsen bør treffes av den samlede rett.
Treffer utvalget avgjørelsen, kan den med opsettende virkning innbringes for Riksretten innen en av utvalget fastsatt frist.
I Riksrettens avgjørelse deltar i så fall også utvalgets medlemmer.
Vidneforklaringer som er avgitt for det særskilte utvalg, skal leses op i møte svenske casino sider den samlede rett, hvis ikke retten beslutter at oplesning kan undlates.
Skriftlige bevis som fremlegges i saken leses op i rettsmøte i den utstrekning retten finner det nødvendig.
Enhver som opholder sig i riket og enhver norsk statsborger er efter innkallelse pliktig til å møte som vidne ved Riksretten uten hensyn til avstanden mellem vidnets opholdssted og rettsstedet.
Den samme møteplikt har den som retten opnevner til å gjøre tjeneste som sakkyndig i saken.
Riksretten bestemmer om der skal mottas vidnesbyrd om hemmelige underhandlinger, rådslagninger eller beslutninger i saker som har betydning for rikets sikkerhet eller rettigheter i forhold til en annen stat.
Likeledes bestemmer Riksretten om et vidne skal fritas for den taushetsplikt som efter lov eller annen gyldig bestemmelse påhviler vidnet.
For øvrig gjelder om vidneplikten og plikten til å gjøre tjeneste som sakkyndig, og om fremgangsmåten ved innkallelse og avhøring av vidner og sakkyndige, reglene i tvisteloven.
Vidner har rett til godtgjørelse av statskassen efter bestemmelsene i den almindelige Side 16 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Dog kan retten fastsette en høiere godtgjørelse.
Godtgjørelsen til sakkyndige fastsettes av retten og utredes av statskassen.
For at straff skal kunne ilegges ved dom av Riksretten, må et flertall av den dømmende retts medlemmer ha stemt for fellelse.
Det samme gjelder ved avgjørelsen av om skadeserstatning eller erstatning for saksomkostninger skal idømmes.
Ved andre avgjørelser gjør presidentens stemme utslaget dersom stemmene står likt.
Når noget medlem av retten forlanger det, skal avgjørelser av Riksretten under sakens gang treffes efter rådslagning og votering således som bestemt i denne lovs § 25.
Om fremgangsmåten ved forkynnelser, om beregningen av frister og om rettergangsstraffer gjelder forskriftene i lovgivningen om de almindelige domstoler, forsåvidt ikke annet følger av bestemmelsene i denne lov.
Forsåvidt denne lov ikke har gitt forskrifter om rettergangsmåten, kan Riksretten under saksbehandlingen gå frem på den måte den finner hensiktsmessig og stemmende med de almindelige rettergangsregler.
Enhver offentlig myndighet har plikt til å yde Riksretten den bistand den begjærer.
De enkelte ledd i rettergangen.
Om Stortingets ansvarskommisjon gjelder reglene i kapittel 3.
Når beslutning om tiltale for Riksrett er fattet, antar Stortinget en eller flere anklagere til å føre saken.
Stortingets president sender utskrift av tiltalebeslutningen til Regjeringen og til Høyesteretts formann, og underretter denne om at Riksrett er besluttet nedsatt og om valget av anklager eller anklagere.
Som president i Riksretten sørger Høyesteretts formann for at tiltalebeslutningen uten ophold blir forkynt for den anklagede.
Forkynnelsen utføres ved notarius publicus.
Dog kan skriftlig erkjennelse fra den anklagede tre istedenfor sådan forkynnelse.
Ved forkynnelsen gjøres den anklagede bekjent med bestemmelsene i denne lovs § 15.
Så snart Stortinget har fattet beslutning om tiltale for Riksrett, kan den eller de anklagede kreve opnevnt en forsvarer som de selv utpeker.
Er det flere anklagere, kan et tilsvarende antall forsvarere kreves opnevnt.
Opnevnelsen foretas av Riksrettens president.
Finner han det rimelig, kan han efter begjæring opnevne særskilte forsvarere for Side 17 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Blir en begjæring om opnevnelse av flere forsvarere ikke tatt tilfølge, kan avgjørelsen prøves av Riksretten.
Blir begjæring om opnevnelse av forsvarer ikke fremsatt innen to uker fra forkynnelsen av tiltalebeslutningen, opnevner presidenten i alle tilfelle forsvarer.
Presidenten underretter den anklagede og anklageren om oppnevnelsen.
Når forsvarer er oppnevnt, sender Riksrettens president i rekommandert brev en fortegnelse visit web page Høyesteretts medlemmer og de av Stortinget valgte medlemmer til anklageren, den anklagede og forsvareren.
Samtidig berammer han rettsmøte i saken.
Han utferdiger innkallelse til den anklagede med et varsel av minst to uker og sørger for at innkallelsen blir forkynt.
Om forkynnelsesmåten gjelder bestemmelsen i § 14 tredje ledd.
Presidenten underretter anklageren og forsvareren om berammelsen og innkaller til rettsmøte.
Når Riksretten er trådt sammen, avgir de av Stortinget valgte medlemmer skriftlig dommerforsikring etter reglene i domstolloven § 60, for så vidt de ikke tidligere har avgitt slik forsikring.
Om forsikringens innhold gjelder de samme regler som for utnevnte dommere.
Det personale som tjenestegjør ved retten, avgir skriftlig forsikring etter reglene i domstolloven § 141 om at de vil bevare taushet om forhandlinger som besluttes holdt hemmelig.
Derefter retter presidenten spørsmål til rettens medlemmer, anklageren, den anklagede og forsvareren, om der for nogen dommer antas å foreligge nogen ugildhetsgrunn, idet presidenten samtidig uttrykkelig gjør opmerksom på, at domstolslovens § 111 casino vacancies dragonara malta gjelder for Riksretten.
Anklageren og forsvareren får i tilfelle adgang til å uttale sig hver to ganger før spørsmålet om ugildhet blir avgjort.
Den anklagede har adgang til å uttale sig ved siden av forsvareren.
Opphevet ved lov 30 mars 2007 nr.
Opphevet ved lov 30 mars 2007 nr.
Opphevet ved lov 30 mars 2007 nr.
Når retten har fått sin lovlige sammensetning, gir anklageren en kort fremstilling av saken og en kort svenske casino sider over de bevis som vil bli ført og hvad dermed aktes godtgjort.
Efterat forsvareren har fått ordet til en tilsvarende fremstilling og bevisoversikt, avhøres den anklagede såfremt han er villig til å avgi forklaring.
Avhøringen ledes av Riksrettens president eller, når han har forfall eller bestemmer det, av den eldste høiesterettsdommer.
Side 18 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Efterat den anklagede er avhørt, foregår bevisførselen.
Anklageren og forsvareren er forpliktet til i tide å forevise hinannen de dokumenter, som de under prosedyren akter å benytte og intet dokument må av anklageren fremlegges i retten, som ikke er forsynt med forsvarerens forevisningspåtegning.
Det samme gjelder forsvareren eller den anklagede.
Har tiden ikke vært tilstrekkelig til å forberede bevisførselen, kan retten av denne grunn utsette saken i så lang tid som finnes påkrevet.
casually vegas casino dress code have vidner avhøres for den samlede rett, ledes avhøringen av Riksrettens president eller, når han bestemmer det, av den eldste høiesterettsdommer.
Det samme gjelder om avhøringen av sakkyndige.
Det kan overlates til anklageren og forsvareren helt eller delvis å foreta avhøringen.
Når bevisførselen er tilendebragt, kan retten efter begjæring utsette saken i så lang tid som finnes nødvendig for at anklageren og forsvareren kan forberede sine fremstillinger til retten.
Anklageren får ordet først og nedlegger påstand.
Derefter får forsvareren ordet og nedlegger sin påstand.
Anklageren og forsvareren har rett til å få ordet to ganger hver.
Den anklagede, eller om det er flere anklagede enhver av dem, kan uttale sig hver gang forsvareren har hatt ordet.
Er det flere anklagere og forsvarere, kan hver av dem ta ordet to ganger.
Når retten finner at saken er ferdig til å pådømmes, erklærer Riksrettens president forhandlingen sluttet og saken optatt til doms.
Medlemmene av den dømmende rett trer uten ophold sammen til rådslagning og votering for lukkede dører.
Voteringen begynner senest den 6te virkedag efterat saken er optatt til doms.
Når voteringen er påbegynt, må den ikke avbrytes, før dommen er avsagt.
Høiesteretts dommere, undtagen Riksrettens president, voterer først.
Efterat de av Stortinget valgte medlemmer har votert, avgir presidenten sitt votum.
Rekkefølgen i voteringen bestemmes for øvrig ved loddtrekning.
Under voteringen skal hvert av rettens medlemmer gi en fullstendig begrunnelse av den domsslutning han foreslår, svenske casino sider således at en senere voterende helt eller delvis kan henvise til det som er uttalt i et tidligere votum.
Dommen avleses av Riksrettens president for åpne dører.
I forbindelse med domsavsigelsen fastsetter retten den godtgjørelse som tilkommer anklageren, forsvareren og særskilt oppnevnte protokollførere.
Godtgjørelsen utredes av statskassen.
Side 19 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Blir den anklagede dømt eller retten finner at den anklagedes forhold ikke har vært rettmessig efter forfatningen, kan det ved dommen pålegges ham å betale erstatning til statskassen for omkostningene ved saken.
Omkostningsansvaret skal i så fall fastsettes til et beløp som avpasses efter den domfeltes skyld og økonomiske evne.
Når Riksrettens dom avsies, offentliggjøres voteringen enten ved oplesning i retten eller på annen måte som retten bestemmer.
Samtidig offentliggjøres de voteringer som ligger til grunn for avgjørelser der er truffet under sakens gang, dersom disse voteringer ikke tidligere er offentliggjort eller efter beslutning av retten skal være hemmelige.
Er nogen del av Riksrettens forhandlinger eller voteringer besluttet å skulle være hemmelige, kan det senere av Stortinget bestemmes om, når og i hvilken utstrekning de kan offentliggjøres.
Når saken således er tilendebragt, utferdiges avskrift av dommen, som underskrives av Riksrettens president og paraferes av dens sekretær.
Hvis Stortinget er samlet, når dommen faller, blir denne domsavskrift først å tilstille Stortingets president, for å opleses i Stortinget, hvorefter den forsynes med publikasjonspåtegning av Stortingets president og sendes tilbake til Riksrettspresidenten, som derefter sender den til Regjeringen med anmodning om dennes foranstaltning i henseende til dommens fullbyrdelse.
Er Stortinget ikke samlet, sender Riksrettens president, efter å ha underrettet Stortingets president, domsavskriften direkte til Regjeringen med sådan anmodning som nevnt.
Sakens dokumenter og rettsboken i saken opbevares i Stortingets arkiv.
Om fullbyrdelse av en av Riksretten avsagt dom gjelder forskriftene i den almindelige lovgivning om fullbyrdelse av dommer.
Stortingets ansvarskommisjon 0 Kapitlet tilføyd ved lov 30 mars 2007 nr.
Når Stortinget ber om det, iverksetter Stortingets ansvarskommisjon undersøkelser for å klarlegge om det er grunnlag for å ta ut tiltale for Riksrett i henhold til Grunnloven § 86.
Ansvarskommisjonen skal ha 5 medlemmer som velges av Stortinget for en periode på inntil 6 år etter innstilling fra Stortingets presidentskap.
Hvis særlige grunner tilsier det, kan Stortinget velge stedfortreder for medlem av kommisjonen i en enkelt sak, Side 20 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Stortinget kan fastsette nærmere regler om kommisjonens sammensetning, arbeidsmåte og administrasjon.
For øvrig bestemmer kommisjonen selv sin arbeidsmåte, og antar den bistand den finner nødvendig.
Kommisjonen kan ikke instrueres om sin utøving av myndighet.
Ansvarskommisjonen gir en vurdering av om den mener det er grunnlag for å gjøre konstitusjonelt ansvar gjeldende mot noen og rapporterer til Stortinget.
Rapporten skal være offentlig, med mindre særlige hensyn tilsier at den helt eller delvis bør være taushetsbelagt.
Så snart Stortinget har besluttet å be ansvarskommisjonen iverksette undersøkelser, har den som undersøkelsene er rettet mot krav på å få oppnevnt offentlig forsvarer.
Oppnevnelsen foretas av kommisjonens leder.
Den som undersøkelsene er rettet mot har for øvrig de samme rettigheter som en som etterforskes i medhold av straffeprosessloven.
Ansvarskommisjonen kan iverksette slike etterforskningsskritt som etter straffeprosessloven kan besluttes av politi eller påtalemyndighet.
Enhver plikter etter innkalling å møte for kommisjonen.
Kommisjonen eller en som handler på vegne av den, kan foreta avhør etter reglene om politiavhør.
Etter reglene i straffeprosessloven kan kommisjonen sette frem begjæring for tingretten om gransking, bruk av tvangsmidler eller om bevisopptak, og kommisjonen kan søke bistand hos sakkyndige.
Kommisjonen kan anmode politiet om å utføre nærmere angitte etterforskningsskritt.
§ 10 tredje ledd annet punktum om godtgjørelse til vitner gjelder tilsvarende for den som etterkommer pålegg om å møte for kommisjonen.
Riksretten skal anlegge sak mot medlemmer av statsrådet, Høyesterett og Stortinget når disse har brutt sine konstitusjonelle plikter mv, og man presiserer at Norges Grunnlov er Kongeriket Norges konstitusjon.
Side 21 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Man plikter å protokollføre alle saker som behandles av Kongen i statsråd etter bestemmelsene i Grunnloven § 30, og i dette tilfellet blir det enkelt for Stortingets ansvarskommisjon og Stortingets kontroll- og konstitusjonskomité å finne den ulovlige statsrådsbeslutningen i korre- sponderende protokoller.
Ved å studere innholdet i f.
Side 22 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Undertegnede kan bistå Stortinget oa med tilleggsinformasjon og praktisk veiledning.
Med hjemmel i avgjørende saksbehandlingsfeil som tidligere er påpekt i nærværende anke se s 2—9 ovenfor nedlegges påstand om at Frostating lagmannsrett må ta anken over besøksforbudet til følge.
Werner Winther Wilhelm Werner Winther Side 23 av 24 WILH.
WERNER WINTHER --- PÅANKE TIL FROSTATING LAGMANNSRETT 11.
Totalt vedlegges 688 sider.
Side 24 av 24 Wilhelm Werner Winther NO-6270 Brattvåg TIL ANKE OVER LOVSTRIDIG KJENNELSE 14-105559SAK-FROS Dato: 11.
Til ovennevnte bemerkes for øvrig at undertegnede ikke på noe vis har blitt orientert om rettsmøtet tingrettsdommer Oskarson new vegas all i sin kjennelse, og at man i påanke til Sunnmøre tingrett av 27.
A Aspehaug, Ålesund jf Vedl.
Umiddelbart etter å ha fremsatt begjæringen om besøksforbud startet fr Dalsegg en ryktekampanje mot undertegnede via sine tallrike kontakter i Human-Etisk Forbund, og i løpet av april og mai d.
Side 2 av 5 Ellers skriver hr Oskarson i sin kjennelse at Inga Dalsegg i samtale med politiet 24.
Dalsegg oppfattet dette som svært belastende.
Det var et manipulert bilde av tvillingsøsteren som død.
Man finner at Inga Dalsegg f 14.
En kan heller ikke se at Inga Dalsegg på noe tidspunkt har gitt uttrykk for at kontakt med undertegnede var uønsket.
Side 3 av 5 Brattvåg, 15.
PS: Norske myndigheter retter alle henvendelser i saken til advokat Johs.
Side 4 av 5 VEDLEGG 1 Sunnmøre tingrett Ålesund PÅANKE AV BESØKSFORBUD Beslutningen om å ilegge undertegnede besøksforbud fattet av Sunnmøre politi- distrikt den 24.
Inga Dalsegg har hverken blokkert eller på noen måte misbilliget undertegnedes dialoginnlegg noe Facebook-konseptet enkelt tillatermen tvert imot gitt uttrykk for at hun ønsket mer informasjon om sin tvillingsøster.
Man fremholder for øvrig at dialogen mellom fr Dalsegg og undertegnede har vært av strengt privat natur, og i den forbindelse minner man om bestemmelsene i Menneskerettsloven: § 2.
Følgende konvensjoner skal gjelde som norsk lov i den utstrekning de er bindende for Norge: 1.
De forente nasjoners internasjonale konvensjon 16.
De forente nasjoners internasjonale konvensjon 16.
De forente nasjoners internasjonale konvensjon 20.
De forente nasjoners internasjonale konvensjon 18.
Endret ved lover 1 aug 2003 nr.
Bestemmelsene i konvensjoner og protokoller som er nevnt i § 2 skal ved motstrid gå foran bestemmelser i cherry casino lovgivning.
Right to respect for private and family life 1.
Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
Side 2 av 4 VEDLEGG 1 Art 9.
Freedom of thought, conscience and religion 1.
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.
Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
Freedom of expression 1.
Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.
This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.
This article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.
The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
Freedom of assembly and association 1.
Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.
No restrictions shall be placed on the exercise of these rights other than such as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
This article shall not prevent the imposition of lawful restrictions on the exercise of these rights by members of the armed forces, of the police or of the administration of the State.
Undertegnede insisterer på at hans juridiske rettigheter respekteres fullt ut i henhold til ovennevnte paragrafer og artikler, og presiserer at innholdet i dialogen mellom ham og Inga Dalsegg ikke angår norske myndigheter.
Det skal ellers tilføyes og understrekes at ethvert ønske fra Inga Dalsegg om å bryte kontakten ville blitt etterkommet umiddelbart dersom det hadde blitt fremmet.
Når det gjelder Sunnmøre politidistrikts ønske om å bruke tvangsmidler, skal man belyse dette nærmere i korresponderende anmeldelse til Spesialenheten for politisaker Hamar.
Side 3 av 4 VEDLEGG 1 TILLEGGSINFORMASJON Straffeprosessloven § 100 b.
Det lyktes ikke undertegnede å få kontakt med advokat Johs.
A ASPEHAUG Ålesund før denne helgen, men hans kontor vil i kveld få oversendt en kopi av nærværende påanke.
Om hr Aspehaug ønsker å gjøre tilføyelser av noe slag, gjenstår å se….
Winther Wilhelm Werner Winther Side 4 av 4 VEDLEGG 2 Spesialenheten for politisaker Kongens gate 30 7012 Trondheim Nordmøre og Romsdal politidistrikt Storgata 43 6501 Kristiansund N ETTERFORSKING AV MULIG KRIMINALITET OG ANMELDELSE AV LOVBRUDD Den 31.
Maleriene hennes er uten kunstnerisk verdi.
Jeg har i lengre tid prøvd å korrigere noen av de mest elementære, kompositoriske mv feilene Inga vanligvis begår se vedlegg etcmen hun er så hovmodig og sta at det er vanskelig å lære henne noe som helst…!
Takker Anja C SOLVIK for et godt innlegg!
Her i Trollheimsporten slipper alle til!
Personlig er jeg ingen Inga-tilhenger og synes det hele bare er pinlig, men det er mindre interessant.
Det gjelder det jeg antar er ditt bilde av en liggende kvinne foran tre talglys og det bildet Inga har malt av samme og som du mener er et plagiat.
Det var vel slik å forstå?
Du kunne ikke sendt dem i jpg-format?
Det hadde vært fint å sette dem inn sammen med inn- legget.
Werner WINTHER er det han jeg finner her?
Derfor blir dine innlegg avvist av Trollheimsporten!
Det fremholdes også at frøken Dalsegg er medlem av Trollheimsporten hvor hun er registrert som selvstendig næringsdrivende m.
Når det gjelder politietaten, så er den gjennomsyret av stinkende korrupsjon --- det finnes knapt noen i Norge som i detalj kjenner bedre til dette enn undertegnede.
Man anmoder med dette Trollheimsporten ved Willy Karlstrøm om å gjøre nærmere rede for hvordan og når den påståtte advarselen fra politimyndighetene ble fremsatt, og ber om kopier dersom den er lagret på digitale medier eller, på noe vis, eksisterer i skriftlig form.
Det understrekes ellers at kritikken mot Inga Dalsegg er berettiget på alle vis, og at den meget lett kan gjøres langt mer alvorlig og omfattende --- jeg forstår selvfølgelig at hr Karlstrøm, som Ingas svenske casino sider venn, misliker innlegget mitt.
Selv om man har purret på hr Karlstrøm for å få en forklaring, har han hittil for- holdt seg taus om de påståtte advarslene fra politimyndighetene.
Man anmoder med dette habile etterforskere fra Nordmøre og Romsdal politi- distrikt om å avhøre Trollheimsportens redaktør, Willy KARLSTRØM, for å bringe klarhet i detaljene rundt advarslene han hevder å ha mottatt.
Jeg skal for ordens skyld presisere at innleggene jeg tidvis skriver for ulike aviser ingenlunde er forfattet for å tekkes f.
Innleggene er uten faktiske feil, og presenteres alltid i en språkform som ligger godt innenfor rammene av det allment akseptable.
ANMELDELSE AV INGA DALSEGG, RINDAL Inga DALSEGG f 14.
Fr Dalsegg har egenhendig signert nevnte plagiat, og vha norske massemedier aktivt markedsført dette som et originalprodukt hun selv har opphavsretten til.
Hun har nyttet plagiatet til offentlig å hetse fr Aulie på en særdeles upassende og avskyelig måte her viser man til en rekke artikler om og intervjuer med fr Dals- egg i Dagbladet, Nettavisen, Driva, Tidens Krav, Sør-Trøndelag, Troll- heimsporten, Radio Norge og P4 m.
Inga Dalsegg har fått anledning til å uttale seg om denne anmeldelsen.
Dette dreier seg om en relativt alvorlig men oversiktlig injurie- og plagiatsak hvor bevisførselen o.
Olavs Plass, Oslo som en av flere aktuelle kandidater.
Katten som er avbildet nedenfor har blitt torturert og druknet nesten umiddelbart før den ble plassert på en av portstolpene mine i Åsen 4, Brattvåg, den 04.
Katten har for øvrig ukjent eier, og har aldri blitt observert i Brattvåg tidligere.
Denne katten ble grovt mishandlet og druknet nesten umiddelbart før den mellom kl 03:40 og 05:00 ble plassert på en av portstolpene utenfor Åsen 4, Brattvåg, den 04.
Man antar at gjernings- personene også mishandlet en kattunge til døde utenfor hovedinngangsdøren min tre dager tidligere.
Werner Winther 8 VEDLEGG 3 Side 1 av 2 VEDLEGG 3 Wilh.
Werner Winther Side 2 av 2 Spesialenheten for Politisaker Hamar Norway ANMELDELSE AV CYBERKRIMINALITET Selv om Spesialenheten rammes av undertegnedes påkommende krav om at det skal reises riksrett kravet fremsettes via Frostating lagmannsrett førstkommende ukefinner man hensiktsmessig å inngi en forenklet anmeldelse mot politi- ansatte som den 21.
Ovennevnte laptop fungerte perfekt og var ikke tilknyttet Internett da den ca kl 03:40 nevnte dato plutselig kollapset idet en uniformert politibil påfallende lang- somt passerte mindre enn 6 meter fra fornærmedes hus.
Flere av de ansatte ved f.
Av regulært ansatte i det norske forsvaret begjæres bl.
Werner Winther Wilhelm Werner Winther The Sheriff Office, NO-6270 Brattvåg, Norway.
REMARKS: Nearby notification is an integral part of the official United Nations petition FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY by Mr Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, and may consequently encompass comments and information otherwise natural to omit in this kind of legal documents.
Norwegian authorities should address all correspondence to counsellor Johs.
O Box 837, 6001 Ålesund.
Representatives of foreign governments, human rights organizations, international tribunals — etc — should apply couriers satisfyingly identifying themselves as authentic messengers.
No letters should be forwarded through the official postal services of Norway or DHL.
Representatives of Norwegian authorities are personae non gratae in Åsen 4, NO-Brattvåg.
Werner WINTHER to the Special Investigating Unit for Police Matters, The Norwegian Supreme Court, the Norwegian Prime Minister, the Norwegian Ministry of Justice, AO; 1 page.
The criminal inclination, unfairness, grave disrespect for the human rights and 3 general ignominy persistently displayed by the official royal family of Norway in this case, clearly excludes friendly and even diplomatic relations with them cf Aphorisms 135, 136 and 137 etc.
The present monarch — King Harald V the Headless cf pp 31 and 68—69was born the 21th of February 1937, and formally swore the oath specified in Article 44 of the Norwegian Constitution Feb 21, 1958.
Mr Headless, upon the death of his father, took office as Norwegian head of state January 17th 1991, and officially swore the oath laid down in Article 9 of the Nor- wegian Constitution four days later.
To those acquainted with the innate corruptibility, judgmental maladroitness and psychopathological temperament prevalent amongst Norwegian senior civil servants and officials cf pp 122—124 aboveit should be no surprise to find essential parts of the Norwegian Constitution going on the rocks right from the start….
For the Storting to grant such consent, at least two thirds of the Members of the Storting shall be present, as required for proceedings for amending the Constitution.
The provisions of this Article do not apply in cases of membership in an international organization, whose decisions only have application for Norway purely under international law.
Directly beneath the Director General of Public Prosecutions, we find the regional public prosecutors superintending the activities of their respective police districts in Norway.
Other frequently sought "payoffs" includes suiciding the police may v.
The moral crap constituting the general body of Norwegian Government officials and the national police force, quickly realized that the combination of piccolo microphones and cobweb-optics was a valuable ally when it came to evade legal actions against themselves.
Unfortunately members of such coalitions may be easily duped, as many of them are naturally caritative, idealistic and unbiased — characteristics the police officers, wholly undeservingly, wish to be professionally associated with.
Besides, aposematically liberticidal bureaucrats opportunistically championing gross injustice steadfastly goose- steps towards the totalitarian, Norwegian police state.
RIEBER-MOHN and Mr Tor-Aksel BUSCH.
Indicated negligence is not casual, of course, and it should be underscored that FOCO is unambiguously mentioned in both documents referred to by Mr Busch cf INDO, pp 159 and 168, respectively.
Mr Busch has certainly been fully aware FOCO as well as INDO was part and parcel of and — as clearly indicated — enclosed with the legal reports in question.
The various members of the Council of State represents the political core of the Norwegian Government, and the nation's highest administrative authority are correspondingly vested in the King's Council cf Article 3 of the Norwegian Constitution.
Said minister councillors acts in their capacity as political supremos of their respective government ministries — e.
Karoliussen Sunnmøre police district.
The attack was forcibly quenched, and the virus is now safely quarantined.
The attack is discovered immediately and effectively quashed.
Nov 01, 2007: Https://chakefashion.com/casino/montego-bay-casino-wendover-room-deals.html 09:00 and 10:15 PM — while utilizing my PC in Åsen 4, NO- Brattvåg editing and printing out 4 private photos sent my family by relatives in the USA, representatives of Norwegian authorities downloaded and stole ELINT-copies of said pics.
Mail contacts wwerner77 yahoo.
Similar terror attacks has been formally reported earlier — cf Doc's 7084 and 7090.
As regards my comprehensive report of the 13th previous month cf Doc 8123this as well as enclosed documents has been forwarded the thoroughly corrupted chief of police Mr Arne Sverre KAROLIUSSEN, NO-Ålesund.
Mr Karoliussen — together with the Norwegian Minister of Justice and the Police Mr Knut STORBERGET — are, of course, amongst the numerous malefactors actual to imprison for the full term and period of their remaining and natural life in this unparalleled case.
Closing nearby letter at 07:06 post meridiem, those guilty of described criminality immediately sabotaged my PC deleting all text usw…!
The same applies to senior officials employed in government offices or in the diplomatic or consular service, to the highest- ranking civil and ecclesiastical officials, commanders of regi- ments and other military formations, commandants of forts and officers commanding warships.
Whether pensions should be granted to senior officials thus dismissed shall be deter- 18 mined by the next Storting.
In the interval they shall receive two thirds of their previous pay.
Other senior officials may only be suspended by the King, and must then without delay be charged before the Courts, but they may not, except by court judgment, be dismissed nor, against their will, transferred.
All senior officials may, without a prior court judgment, be discharged from office upon attaining the statutory age limit.
The how many casinos in american in this section shall not restrict the right to punish a senior civil servant or civil servant by depriving him of his post pursuant to the rules of penal legislation.
SECTION 21 If a senior civil servant or civil servant is subjected to disciplinary measures or summary discharge for a criminal offence, this shall not preclude normal criminal prosecution, but assessment of the sentence shall take the disciplinary measures or summary discharge into consideration.
Anyhow — seeing that an independent and impartial tribunal is sine qua non in respect of a fair trial, lodging an appeal to the Norwegian King in Council of State scarcely stands to reason at all in this case….
Diplomatic matters which the Council of State decides to keep secret shall be entered in a special record.
The same applies to military command matters which the Council of State decides to keep secret.
Everyone who has a seat in the Council of State has the duty to frankly express his opinion, to which the King is bound to listen.
But it rests with the King to make a decision ac- cording to his own judgment.
If any Member of the Council of State is of the opinion that the King's decision conflicts with the form of govern- ment or the laws of the Realm, or is clearly prejudicial to the Realm, it is his duty to make strong remonstrances against it, as well as to have his opinion entered in the records.
A Member who has not thus protested is deemed to have been in agreement with the King, and shall be answerable in such manner as may be subsequently de- cided, and may be impeached by the Odelsting before the Court of Impeachment.
ARTICLE 31 All decisions drawn up by the King shall, in order to be- come valid, be countersigned.
The decisions relating to military command are countersigned by the person who has presented the matter, while other decisions are counter- signed by the Prime Minister or, if he has not been present, by the highest-ranking Member of the Council of State present.
Not only has the Norwegian King Harald V sanctioned the illegal conspiracy against me with his personal signature, but he is — in all likelihood — entirely unentitled to occupy the Norwegian Throne as well cf FOCO, pp 169—170 …!
Article 14: The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status.
Article 17: Nothing in this Convention may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the Convention.
THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Decla- ration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of see more political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or terri- tory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self- governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
Article 6: Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.
Article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law.
All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
Article 8: Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.
Article 28: Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.
Article 29 3 : These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Article 30: Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.
INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS Article 2 1 : Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the https://chakefashion.com/casino/casino-st-moritz-suisse.html recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth this web page other status.
Article 3: The State Parties to the present Click the following article undertake to ensure the equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all civil and political rights set forth in the present Covenant.
Article 5 1 : Nothing in the present Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant.
Article 5 2 : There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the fundamental human rights recognized or existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law, conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.
In the deter- mination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law.
The Press and the public may be excluded from all or part of a trial for reasons of morals, public order ordre public or national security in a democratic society, or when the interest of the private lives of the parties so requires, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the in- terests of justice; but any judgement rendered in a criminal case or in a suit at law shall be made public except where the interest of juvenile persons otherwise requires or the proceedings concern matrimonial disputes or the guardianship of children.
Article 16: Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person be- fore the law.
Article 26: All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to the equal article source of the law.
In this respect, the law shall prohibit any discrimination and guarantee to all persons equal and effective protection against discrimination on any ground such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or so- cial origin, property, birth or other status.
Studying above excerpts from various human rights conventions, it becomes even clearer the Norwegian Council of State totally lacks the judicial power and authority to hear and determine any thing whatever in this case cf pp 176—178 above etc.
Article 71 The members of the Storting function as such for four successive years.
Article 73 The Storting nominates from among its members one fourth to constitute the Lagting, the remaining three fourths to constitute the Odelsting.
This nomination shall take place at the first session of the Storting that assembles after a new General Election, whereafter the Lagting shall remain unchanged at all sessions of the Storting assembled after the same election, except insofar 26 as any vacancy which may occur among its members has to be filled by special nomination.
Each Ting holds its meetings separately and nominates its own President and Secretary.
Neither Ting may hold a meeting unless at least half of its Members are present.
However, Bills concerning amendments to the Constitution may not be dealt with unless at least two thirds of the Members of the Storting are present.
Article 74 As soon as the Storting is constituted, the King, or whoever he appoints for the purpose, shall open its proceedings with a Speech, in which he shall inform it of the state of the Realm and of the issues to which he particularly desires to call the attention of the Storting.
No deliberations may take place in the presence of the King.
When the proceedings of the Storting have been opened, the Prime Minister and the Members of the Council of State have the right to attend the Storting, as well as both departments of the Storting, and, like its Members, although without voting, to take part in any proceedings conducted in open session, while in matters discussed in closed sessions only insofar as permitted by the Ting concerned.
Article 76 Every Bill shall first be proposed in the Odelsting, either by one of its own Members, or by the government through a Member of the Council of State.
If the Bill is passed, it is sent to the Lagting, which either approves or rejects it, and in the latter case returns it with appended comments.
These are taken into consideration by the Odelsting, which either shelves the bill or again sends it to the Lagting, with or without alteration.
When a Bill from the Odelsting has twice been presented to the Lagting and has been returned a second time as rejected, the Storting shall meet in plenary session, and the bill is then decided by a majority of two thirds of its votes.
Between each such deliberation there shall be an interval of at least three days.
Article 77 When a Bill passed by the Odelsting has been approved by the Lagting or by the Storting in plenary session, it is sent to the King, with a request that it may receive the Royal Assent.
Article 78 If the King assents to the Bill, he appends his signature, whereby it becomes law.
If he does not assent to it, he returns it to the Odelsting with a statement 28 that he does not for the time being find it expedient to sanction it.
In that case the Bill must not again be submitted to the King by the Storting then assembled.
Article 79 If a Bill has been passed unaltered by two sessions of the Storting, constituted after two separate successive elections and separated from each other by at least two intervening sessions of the Storting, without a divergent Bill having been passed by any Storting in the period between the first and last adoption, svenske casino sider it is then submitted to the King with a petition that His Majesty shall not refuse his assent to a beneficial, it shall become law even if the Royal Assent is not accorded before the Storting goes into recess.
Article 80 The Storting shall remain in session as long as it deems it necessary and shall terminate its proceedings when it has concluded its business.
In accordance with the rules of procedure adopted by the Storting, the proceedings may be resumed, but they shall terminate not later than the last Sunday in the month of September.
Within this time the King shall communicate his decision with regard to the Bills that have not already been decided cf Articles 77 to 79by either confirming or rejecting them.
All those which he does not expressly accept are deemed to have been rejected by him.
In consequence whereof We have assented to and confirmed, as We hereby do assent to and confirm the same as Law under Our Hand and the Seal of the Realm.
The specific rules concerning indictment by the Odelsting in accor- dance with this Article shall be determined by law.
However, the limitation period for the institution of indictment proceedings be- fore the Court of Impeachment may not be set at less than 15 years.
The permanent Members of the Lagting and the permanently app- ointed Members of the Supreme Court are judges of the Court of Impeachment.
The provisions contained in Article 87 shall apply to the composition of the Court of Impeachment in the particular case.
In the Court of Impeachment the President of the Lagting shall preside.
Any person sitting in the Court of Impeachment as a Member of the Lagting shall not resign from the Court if the period for which he is elected as a representative to the Storting expires before the Court of Impeachment has concluded the trial of the case.
If he ceases, for any other reason, to be a Member of the Storting, he shall re- sign as a judge of the Court of Impeachment.
The same applies if a Justice of the Supreme Court, who is a Member of the Court of Impeachment, retires as a Member of the Supreme Court.
Article 87 The accused and the person acting on behalf of the Odelsting in the proceedings have the right to challenge as many Members of the Lagting and of the Supreme Court as will leave remaining fourteen Members of the Lagting and seven Members of the Supreme Court as judges in the Court of Impeachment.
Each party in the proceed- ings may challenge an equal number of the Members of the Lagting, although the accused has the preferential right to challenge one more, if the number to be challenged is not divisible by two.
The same shall apply to the challenging of the Members of the Supreme Court.
If there are several accused in such proceedings, they exercise the right of challenge collectively in accordance with rules prescribed by law.
If the right of challenge is not exercised to the extent permitted, as many Members of the Lagting and of the Supreme Court as are in excess of fourteen and seven respectively retire following the draw- ing of lots.
The President of the Court of Impeachment and the President of the Supreme Court shall in no case retire following the drawing of lots.
If the Court of Impeachment cannot be composed of as many Mem- bers of the Lagting or of the Supreme Court as prescribed above, the case may nevertheless be tried and judgment rendered, provided that the Court numbers at least ten judges.
Specific provisions as to the procedure to be followed in the compos- ition of the Court of Impeachment shall be laid down by law.
In any case the Norwegian Courts of Justice Act — which still applies to the composition etc of the Court of Impeachment — provides that: 1.
In the deter- mination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and 33 public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law.
Whoever eats their eggs will die, and when one is broken, an adder is hatched.
Their cobwebs are useless for clothing; they cannot cover themselves with what they make.
Their deeds are evil deeds, and acts of violence are in their hands.
Their feet rush into sin; they are swift to shed innocent blood.
Their thoughts are evil thoughts; ruin and destruction mark their ways.
The way of peace they do not know; there is no justice in their paths.
They have turned them into crooked roads; no-one who walks in them will know peace.
Although psychiatric ill-health and multifarious impairment of higher cerebral functions are alarmingly common amongst Norwegian officials, the greater part of them tends to be criminally responsible as personality 35 disorders — particularly psychopathy — and various perversions are predominant conditions.
The pathologically distorted thought and behavior patterns normally typifying Norwegian public officials and senior civil servants may however — viewed as an endemic phenomenon — partially rupture the commonly accepted boundaries imposed by international norms of disease classification.
The above collection of personality traits and symptoms manifestly typical but not necessarily conclusive of NPSMS, clearly invites to differentiated diagnosing; while the moodiness and fluctuating self-image are amongst the distinguishing features of the borderline personality, the thoroughgoing reality distortion and oftentimes systematic misinterpretation of events exhibited by some NPSMS afflicted individuals are truly archtypical of regular psychoses.
The severe, recurrent and wholly intentional misconduct and criminality fundamentally peculiar to NPSMS-villains are closest related to the antisocial personality disorder, however, but are more complex and frequently includes dangerous paranoia, religious delusions and sheer diabolism.
In most psychiatric disorders it's relatively uncomplicated to identify some precipitating factors — i.
When it comes to the NPSMS it's usually hard to detect decisive, psychotogenic factors — as a matter of fact one may feel slightly ill at ease attempting to discriminate readily observable, morbid features from entirely self-willed and obviously unreasonable evil-mindedness.!
Ethically indefensible, evilness purely for the sake of evilness may assuredly be a ponerologically acceptable and ipso facto rational aim in itself most religious dogmas omitted, of course.
As regards predisposing factors, genetic endowment and hereditary metabolic, anatomical and physiological insufficiencies in prefrontal cortices, the thalamencephalon, hypothalamus and limbic system may be crucial for the actual onset and subsequent diagnosing of NPSMS.
Serotonin's neuronal transmitter functions and capability to modulate v.
Despite depicted brain abnormalities, many NPSMS-caitiffs are capable of performing just about normally on standard neuropsychological tests — working memory, concentration and the general intelligence seems to be intact.
Studying the thousands of registered crimes and calamitous boo-boos wholly ascribable to Norwegian officials and local authorities the last decennium, we are struck not only by the unprovoked diabolism and radical unsoundness characterizing these misdeeds, but by the marked lack of foresight and stark fatuity as well.
Inasmuch as essential parts of our noometric capability may be adequately evaluated through standardized and accurately scaled intelligence tests….
At this point those of you familiar with the common classification of IQ scores may feel somewhat bewildered, as it previously 've been correctly stated several of the culprits actual to prosecute in this case possess' a general IQ equal or superior to 140 on the Stanford-Binet scale cf pp 9—10.
In the general 38 Norwegian population 1 out of 190 people are expected to achieve a Stanford-Binet IQ of 140, and there are roughly 3 men for every woman reaching specified score.
Typically earning their university and first-class degrees relatively hands down, these noometrically — and oftentimes professionally — incompetent persons are likely to occupy central community positions.
While a general Stanford-Binet IQ of 140 typically will enable otherwise competent members of the Norwegian courts of appeals to handle around 80% of the various lawsuits in a justifiable manner, a ditto IQ of 258 are required to keenly perceive and adequately evaluate usw the intricate nuances and multifarious facts relevant to the most complicated cases brought before these appellate tribunals.
Moreover we strongly feel that the Norwegian society generally should bestow significantly more of their attention purely revering our allelopathic lawbreaking.
From the very first these natural-born villains and mountebanks searched for esoteric and absurd ways to elevate their base intellect…; perhaps geniuses depended on some secret ingesta or regimen skyrocketing their creativity and IQs….?!
It's perfectly evident many of the crimes dealt with in this petition and corresponding documents had been very difficult to commit and impossible to get away with in a relatively uncorrupted and otherwise healthy society….
They raided as far as the 'Wonderstrand' Cape Codand they usually made themselves enemies wherever they went, in America as in Europe.
Precisely as anticipated, Norwegian authorities has maintained and segmentally reinforced their intensely criminal, human rights violating, and contemptuously subhuman terrorism throughout AD 2007 cf pp 1, 10, 122—124, item Doc 4588 etcand I've described and formally reported a tiny fraction of the various offences only.
On the whole, this year may be seen as a practically unbroken chain of state actuated crimes, insanities, and malicious provocations massively corroborating and justifying whatever denouncement of Norwegian authorities set forth in nearby Complaint.
Werner WINTHER to the Special Investigating Unit for Police Matters, The Norwegian Supreme Court, the Norwegian Prime Minister, the Norwegian Ministry of Justice, AO; 1 page.
Due to persistent, dangerous and totally illegal harassment and interference from Norwegian authorities, representatives from foreign governments, human rights organizations and tribunals etc should apply couriers satisfyingly identifying themselves as authentic messengers — no letters should be forwarded through, e.
Norwegian authorities are much likely to v.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Accused: Name: The Kingdom of Norway.
Comments on disqualification: Nearby complaint is handed over to the sheriff office in NO-Brattvåg, Norway — cf the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act sec 223, first period.
Said office has a central position as legally charged in this case.
Article 14: The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status.
Article 17: Nothing in this Convention may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the Convention.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Article 18: The restrictions permitted under this Convention to the said rights and freedoms shall not be applied for any purpose other than those for which they have been prescribed.
Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or terri- tory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self- governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
Article 6: Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.
Article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law.
All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Article 8: Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.
Article 10: Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Article 28: Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.
Article 29 3 : These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Article 30: Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Article 2 1 : Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
Article 2 3 : Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes: a To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity; b To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy; c To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted.
Article 3: The State Parties to the present Covenant undertake to ensure the equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all civil and political rights set forth in the present Covenant.
Article 5 1 : Nothing in the present Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Article 5 2 : There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the funda- mental human rights recognized or existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law, conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.
Article 14 1 : All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals.
In the deter- mination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law.
The Press and the public may be excluded from all or part of a trial for reasons of morals, public order ordre public or national security in a democratic society, or when the interest of the private lives of the parties so requires, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the in- terests of justice; but any judgement rendered in a criminal case or in a suit at law shall be made public except where the interest of juvenile persons otherwise requires or the proceedings concern matrimonial disputes or the guardianship of children.
Article 16: Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person be- fore the law.
Article 26: All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to the equal protection of the law.
In this respect, the law shall prohibit any discrimination and guarantee to all persons equal and effective protection against discrimination on any ground such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or so- cial origin, property, birth or other status.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report The Norwegian Courts of Justice Act provides that: 1.
All judges except lay-judges and assessors must sign a binding assurance obliging them to exert their office conscientiously sec 60, cf sec 52 ib item the Norwegian Constitution Article 21 ; 2.
For the Storting to grant such consent, at least two thirds of the Members of the Storting shall be present, as required for proceedings for amending the Constitution.
The provisions of this Article do not apply in cases of membership in an international organization, whose decisions only have application for Norway purely under international law.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report the various crimes wherewith the Kingdom of Norway are charged in this legal case unique in Norwegian history of law.
This shall not be the rule where the application of the remedies is unreasonably prolonged or is unlikely to bring effective relief to the person who is the victim of the violation of this Convention cf Doc 4588, pp 119—121 item Articles 1, 4, 9, 12, 13 and 20 etc of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
Said Convention has particular regard to Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights item Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights — both of which provide that no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
The members of the actual juries in this case will face a pack well-educated and politically experienced liars who will do their very best to manipulate and de- ceive them.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Mr Arne RUSET IQ 140 — cf Doc 377, pp 41—44Mr Ivar OFTEDAHL IQ 140 — cf Doc 377, pp 28 and 41 and Mr Carsten SMITH IQ 153,5 — cf p 68 etc are amongst the most dangerous.
Average Stanford-Binet IQ for Norwegian physicians and nurses are 125 and 118, respectively i.
Nevertheless; Tormod — then the leader of the We Shall Overcome organization — had received some official, pecuniary compen- sation for parts of the illegal terror imposed by Norwegian police.
Ulf and Tormod agreed the police premeditatedly had attempted to ruin their health and economy etc by e.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report reassured them the peaceloving pacifist indeed was a most dangerous saboteur and spy who had travelled to their nation solely to effectuate massive terrorist attacks etcanother told how representatives from the police had spread po- tentially lethal pathogens in his apartment in Oslo unfortunately for the police officers trustworthy neighbors observed the attempted assassination — before the curtains were drawn.
In any event, at 10:45 PM, Ms Finne-Grønn reached her parents house a few minutes later — in good condition.
Anyhow; the actual evening she hesitated.
But no: she turned off into Anne Maries vei — and less than 100 meters northwards I had to wade across a river in order to intersect her if she came too close the uxoricide maniac ensconced at the end of said road.
Ms Finne-Grønn evidently looked for a place where she dry-shoed etc could proceed to the suburban commuter railway east of her.
I supposed the presumable slayer hiding at the end of Anne Maries vei had his pistol damned prepped for the occasion, and I knew a clever marks- man would hit Ms Finne-Grønn with the first round if she took another 25 steps onward.
From my post 10 meters ahead of her I suddenly leapt unto the street — expecting her to be frightened.
But: instead of turning back fleeing here of the danger zone, Ms Finne-Grønn studied me attentively a few seconds before smiling delighted — stepping straight towards me!
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report besides, I dare add, I had excellent personal contact with another nice nurse at that time!
So, much to her surprise, I gestured her to halt and march away in the opposite direction.
May the 27th, 2005, I consulted the administration of the Norwegian Broad- casting Corporation regarding the corpse left right outside their office doors Sep 3rd, 1992.
The Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation is wholly controlled by Norwegian authorities, of course, and thus the main-disperser of state forged propaganda!
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Due to the threatening situation previously described, I dearly wanted Ms Finne-Grønn to change her hazardous routines a bit in regard to her nosto- parental visits — so, the 4th, I sent her a concise and inoffensive note to attain this objective.
The 5th Ms Finne-Grønn decided to inform the police about the situation.
The police station at Majorstua, Oslo, promptly assigned an officer to watch her flat in her absence, and ordained a provisional bodyguard and motorcycle escort as well.
Late in the evening the 6th she was back outside her apartment — wearing one of her dark overcoats, she stealthily moved to-and-fro mostly concealed by a dense hedge.
By now she had permanently altered some of her night-tide routines and exhi- bited a hopefully prophylactic degree of reasonable suspicion.
Ensuing days I leisurely inspected the police activities around Ms Finne-Grønn, and it soon became regrettably manifest they were incapable of rendering her required assistance.
Ms Finne-Grønn was repeatedly seen wholly unprotected in the murky area around her parents house, and I decided the murderer had to be caught rather quickly.
Greatly relieved the manslaughter were jailed, I hoped for a few days off.
Unable to contrive the missing links and markedly confused by the complex chain of causation generally, the police exhibited maladapted interest for me the last part of September.
Well acquainted with the different aspects of the case, I continued my life much as normal and did no attempts whatsoever to mystify or conceal e.
The officers from Majorstua Police Station had my identity at this point of time, and suddenly started to act explicitly menacing — to a given person they ad- 15 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 15 by Wilh.
The seemingly irresistible urge to compensate for assorted shortcomings through stark falsehood and extensive nefariousness, soon turned out as one of the foremost hallmarks of these fundamentally vicious ruffians.
While I visited miscellaneous associations etc in Oslo October 6th, spiteful officers from Majorstua Police Station did their best to denigrate my reputation vis-à-vis my landlord and a pensioned ambassador in the immediate neighbor- hood.
A native Norwegian, the ambassador had been permanently stationed e.
Returning to my attic-lodging in the late afternoon, I immediately recognized intruders employing at least óne forged key had searched the unpretentious living room.
Inspecting the small balcony adjoining the garret, I quickly discov- ered a couple insulated wires inchoatively hidden by corresponding girders and corner stud.
Following the thin cords with the eyes, two of them ran along the outside wall to the ground where they continued southwards, while another pair apparently led into the apartment beneath.
I frequently employed said veranda for laundry purposes, and firmly knew none of described wires had been there a week ago.
A few hours later I put on my tracksuit and went outside — it was dark.
I barely ran a kilometer before heading for my dwelling house — wading across a nearby river, I surreptitiously advanced from east.
Partially hidden by surrounding shrubs he intentionally kept in the dark, but each time he sucked his revered cigarette a tiny gleam dimly illuminated his facial features — it was one of the notorious undercover agents.
During their numerous break-ins the police had installed several electronic hootanannies both inside and around my lodging — one of these accursed gadgets were discovered in a narrow dead end of the attic less than 50 centi- meters from my bed.
I retreated inside, but 5 minutes later I was back on the modest veranda; a man in his thirties frenetically struggled to remove as much of aforementioned wires as possible!
Nevertheless — a new and ominous trend had been initiated this evening; studying some vacuum-packed sausages I quickly discovered the miniscule pinprick underneath the price tag, and the newly baked rye bread had been contaminated with a scarcely visible granulate!
Going collectively bananas, the bootless police officers now launched a dozen strikingly hatefull attacks to annoy and cripple me.
The 15th — at 04:30 AM — a toolwielding motorcyclist from Majorstua Police Station sabotaged the streetlight outside my dwelling, and forthcoming mid- night the entire street lay bathed in darkness!
Due to the nocturnal ultrasound-terror, I routinely took a nap in the morning be- fore going to the center of Oslo.
Underneath I heard my landlord utilizing the phone before leaving in his car, and I prepared to sleep for an hour and a half — it was the 24th day of October.
Laying prone on the bed relaxing, an unexpected noise reached my ears; appa- rently the sound of water running in the domiciliary plumbing system!
This was curious, because I knew the landlord not yet had returned — so, under other- wise normal conditions, I should be the only person in just now.
I flung myself out of the room rather swiftly — rushing down the stairs heading for the exterior door.
Outside I forthwith entered nearby garage — grabbing a laid away matchbox, I inhaled deeply before advancing upstairs.
Stretching my arms 40— 50 centimeters into the apartment, I attempted to enkindle a couple matches.
Flinging the door agape, I withdrew alfresco where I quickly found the matches to be in perfect condition.
Staying outside nearly 20 minutes before reentering the flat, I had no difficulties burning up one of the matches, but I unclosed a window and opened the bal- cony door though — the stuffy air had a peculiar odor.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report carbon dioxide gas CO2.
Anyhow — the most pernicious assault by far this day, was planned and direct- ed by the well-known but feckless Norwegian parascientess Ms Anna Elisabeth WESTERLUND.
A fatally improper onslaught, Ms Westerlund appeared out- side my flat next day — carrying out a certain ritual before leaving.
Completely reneging juridical regulations and social codes, the cops subsequent days exploited every manifest opportunity to make trouble.
Arriving in Stockholm, it became clear Norwegian police had informed their Swedish colleagues about my presence.
Said stuff discreetly and successfully transmitted, I immediately returned to Norway — It should be duly underscored the police never found anything unlawful or other- wise objectionable during the various break-ins touched upon above — neither had they justifiable reasons for suspecting any degree of criminality.
Actively tak- ing part in the deportation etc of Norwegian Jews, he was indirectly guilty e.
Imprisoned from 1948—1949 he was 19 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 19 by Wilh.
Well — the national association of barristers naturally found the rather ill- mannered Mr Barth guilty of malconduct ex officio.
Telltalely a member of the beforehand contaminated Supreme Court since 1997, the vindictive Mr Rieber-Mohn should be a main target for everybody whole- heartedly striving to lessen official corruption and covert racism in Norway.
It ought to be emphasized parts of the blatant misconduct exhibited by the police in Oslo were nourished by slandering brought about by — particularly — Mr Olav HOFF, NO-Langevåg.
I honestly replied I was an extraordinary upright person condemning wrongdoing absolutely, so — whoever had accused or annoyed me was indeed wicked and thus liable to punishment.
Nevertheless — based on lamebrained misconceptions, spite and most undue curiosity, Mr Hoff willfully provoked and clearly applauded some of the rabid terror exercised by his colleagues in Oslo.
In connection to the human rights document sent the permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the United Nations — Ambassador Andrey I DENISOV — September 20, 2004 cf Doc 3217officers anxious to destroy pieces of evidence against themselves arranged a fire at Majorstua Police Station, Oslo, in the evening eight days later.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report instances scared the downright iniquitous cops.
As for my landlord in Oslo, Mr Fridtjof HØYER, he probably suffered lasting health impairment as a result of the police waged terrorism — and, in all like- lihood, he became the victim of at least óne serious offence committed to hide this criminality.
A grandchild of the famous Norwegian Fridtjof NANSEN, Mr Høyer had ex- hausted himself nursing his disabled wife before she died.
Mr Høyer never fully recovered from the malicious injustice, and frequently lamented the lack of adequate empathy exhibited by his own children.
Above mentioned rangers were commissionaires from a special contingent para- troopers known to cooperate closely with Norwegian police vg in anti- and counterterrorism matters.
Military value and civilian applicability otherwise unquestioned, their present liaison with the severely vitiated police force is eclectically contravening, pro- fessionally deleterious and deeply disgraceful indeed.
Waging gross injustice rather than war in this case, the paratroopers should purchase a physical, moral and purely intellectual standard unequalled by 97% of Norwegian police officers.
Before expiring in 1995, she testamentary donated her brain to the university in NO-Bergen, and one of the pathologists dissecting it — Mr Inge MORILD — also conducted a post-mortem examination of my murdered fiancée in Nov- ember 1996 cf Document 599, pp 47—49.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report out the goings-on for him.
I gave a short account.
Waiting for the train to Oslo, another Swedish police officer frustrated asked me what kind of rancid hodgepodge their Norwegian colleagues tried to serve them.
Norwegian authorities constantly and underhandedly searching for opportunities to explain away etc their rotten misconduct, it is thoroughly stressed the truly subhuman diabolism exercised by the police in Oslo were through and through evil-intended and without extenuating circumstances.
I was about to enter bed when aforementioned Mr Olav Hoff and a female phy- sician, Kristin HENDEN, came into the house.
Pretending my mental condition bothered them, Mr Hoff told they intended to bring me to a nearby hospital for further examination.
I was forced to swallow some debilitating drugs, and locked up in a cozy hos- pital pokey overnight.
In the morning two police officers transported me by car 22 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 22 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report to the funny farm at Hjelset right east of NO-Molde — My first encounter with the loony bin at Hjelset proceeded pretty much as be- forehand expected — never previously interned, I was certainly well prepared for the fiendish absurdities awaiting me though.!
From 1975—1979 I was an active member of the Norwegian Boy Scouts move- ment, and much of the time I functioned as a Scoutmaster.
One of the lads I taught e.
Certainly not the brightest in my scout troop, Mr Nygård nevertheless surpassed everybody in one, distinct discipline: malingering!
Instructing both Boy and Girl Scouts in first aid techniques as v.
Cosmetically pallid, pseudo-wounds frightfully agape and with artificial blood trickling from ears and mouth etc, he most definitely seemed death-struck, and several times persons unfamiliar with his bizarre talent for simulation indeed felt convinced they faced an authentic emergency situation.!
As Mr Nygård commenced secondary education, parts of his personality changed for the worse — he became nauseatingly stuck-up, machinating and outright mendacious.
This sudden hostility was totally unprovoked and unreasonable, so I immediately 23 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 23 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report demanded an explanation.
He admitted I always had treated him properly and never offended him in any way, but he felt like backstabbing and injuring me anyhow.
Before parting I asked if he somehow felt envy towards me, and he replied he most likely did.
Mr Nygård waited more than 10 years before realizing his vow to harm me.
First he phoned Mr Olav Hoff at that time employed at the local sheriff officeand then the nearby casualty department at NO-Åse.
Mr Hoff was beforehand informed by his colleagues in Oslo about my presence, and had waited for this preplanned excuse to falsely accuse and illegally appre- hend me.
At this time I was wholly aware the married Mr Hoff for years had abused his position as a police officer to gain sexual favor from a number of women, and his flirtatiously manipulative behavior vis-à-vis the young and naive Ms Henden was rather ostentatious this night.
Later he was convicted for some of his sexual turpitude, but the extension and negative consequences of his misconduct was never uncovered by the partially corrupted jury.
Several representatives from the hospital at NO-Åse had been clandestinely involved in the putrid complot against me before I reached the Ålesund-region, and Ms Elin Thomassen Dyrhaug was absolutely one of them — she was e.
Whereas Ms Thomassen Dyrhaug decidedly is one of the principal culprits in this disastrous case, the real architect behind the nosocomial conspiracy was Ms Aase SVENDSEN ROLAND b April 29, 1938 — one of her befriended colleagues and the professionally incompetent and repugnantly immoral leader of the psychiatric department at indicated hospital.
Ms Svendsen Roland was also more or less acquainted with my parents in advance, and with her criminal predisposition, suppressed sexuality, Christian 24 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 24 by Wilh.
Ms Aase Svendsen Roland and Ms Elin Thomassen Dyrhaug was both amongst the physicians who had planned, approved and recommended the totally illegal terror waged against me in Oslo!
Before the iatrogenic atrocities in Oslo, the emotionally wayward and intellectu- ally trifling Ms Svendsen Roland had been shrewdly manipulated by my parents who convinced her my strategically hustle-bustle eclosion and ensuing rejection of them in 1984 was spurred by impulsivity and unsoundness.
Affected by my parents prevarication and willingly ignoring readily document- able facts of the case, Ms Svendsen Roland subsequently committed the truly fatal error in her life.
In 1975 I decided to design the company logo unmistakably reflecting this fact — a piece of circumstantial evidence convenient for future application.
} the 31st of October.
Also for my parents whom I left deliberately hurried in 1984 has it been important to think up a spurious but — to themselves — soothing expla- nation in respect of my deceptively dramatic take-off.
Anyhow — by November 1992 my skillful stalwarts had been discreetly and successfully emplaced both inside and in strategical vicinity of the vitiated laughing academy; the amount final proofs intelligently collected by these dauntless champions and professional entourage are truly enormous, and their sharp-witted testimonies will be unconditionally devastating for my hope- and 28 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 28 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report honorless foes!
A fundamentally pusillanimous, immature and perfidious good-for-nothing, Mr Møller compensated for some of his shortcomings through attributing his own, despicable frailness and vile nature to me.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report to attempted and harmful cooperation with rabidly criminal representatives of Norwegian authorities.
As for the police, they largely maintained their well-known tailgating whenever I was allowed to go outside the stinking nuthouse — and I certainly knew these mentally deranged and bloody criminals should engender vast difficulties and illegally blockade justice also in the future.
December 21th I was released from the political state prison at Hjelset, and forthright settled in NO-Brattvåg where one of my cousins, Mr Egil HÅVIK, had offered me temporary lodgment.
Before kicking off the from A to Z daffy and lawless terror-campaign against me in Oslo, Ms Aase Svendsen Roland and her deranged partners in crime collu- sively obtained operational permission from e.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Mr Per SÆVIK, Mr Gudmund RESTAD, Mr Lodve SOLHOLM, Ms Marie L WIDNES and Ms Karita BEKKEMELLEM.
A tainted Labour Party representative like the Norwegian Prime Minister — Ms Gro HARLEM BRUNDTLAND — herself, Ms Kaland et al handily acquired governmental support for the assuredly morbid and stark illegal assaults against me.
Ms Harlem Brundtland and her mafiosi in turn presented the disastrous complot for the Norwegian monarch, Mr Harald HEADLESS, who spitefully approved the insanities in the usually hebdomadal Council of State.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report The President and Vice President of the Norwegian Lagting was Mr Hans J RØSJORDE Progress Party and Mr Jostein Fjærvoll Christian Democratic Partyrespectively.
The President and Vice President removed kelowna casino open hours with the Norwegian Odelsting was Ms Inger Lise GJØRV Labour Party and Ms Tora AASLAND HOUG Socialist Left Partyrespectively.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Supporting the psychotic complot against me from the onset, the office of the Director General of Public Prosecutions was headed by Mr Georg Fr.
RIEBER-MOHN and Mr Tor-Aksel BUSCH.
The County Governors of Møre og Romsdal and Oslo og Akershus A 1992 — Mr Alv Jakob FOSTERVOLL and Mr Kåre WILLOCH — are particularly interesting persons in this connection.
Members of the Norwegian Storting 1989—1993 Akershus County: — Mr Reiulf STEEN Labour Party — Ms Helen BØSTERUD Labour Party — Mr Thor-Eirik GULBRANDSEN Labour Party — Ms Anneliese DØRUM Labour Party — Mr Jo BENKOW Conservative Party — Ms Kaci KULLMANN FIVE Conservative Party — Mr Jan PETERSEN Conservative Party — Ms Eva R FINSTAD Conservative Party — Mr Tore HAUGEN Conservative Party — Ms Anne ENGER LAHNSTEIN Centre Party — Mr Fridtjof Frank GUNDERSEN Progress Party — Mr Finn THORESEN Progress Party — Mr Jan Erik FÅNE Progress Party — Ms Tora AASLAND Socialist Left Party — Mr Paul CHAFFEY Socialist Left Party Aust-Agder County: — Ms Brit JØRGENSEN Labour Party — Mr Tore A LILTVED Conservative Party — Ms Helga HAUGEN Christian Democratic Party — Mr Jens MARCUSSEN Progress Party Buskerud County: — Mr Erik DALHEIM Labour Party 34 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 34 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — Ms Kirsti KOLLE GRØNDAHL Labour Party — Mr Trond JENSRUD Labour Party — Ms Åse KLUNDELIEN Labour Party — Mr Hallgrim BERG Conservative Party — Mr Arild HIIM Conservative Party — Mr Steinar MARIBO Progress Party Finnmark County: — Ms Oddrun PETTERSEN Labour Party — Mr Karl Eirik SCHJØTT-PEDERSEN Labour Party — Mr Reidar JOHANSEN Socialist Left Party — Mr Anders AUNE Aune-List Hedmark County: — Mr Kjell BORGEN Labour Party — Ms Eirin FALDET Labour Party — Mr Sigbjørn JOHNSEN Labour Party — Ms Sylvia BRUSTAD Labour Party — Mr Einar Olav SKOGHOLT Labour Party — Mr Johan C LØKEN Conservative Party — Ms Ragnhild Q HAARSTAD Centre Party — Mr Magnar SORTÅSLØKKEN Socialist Left Party Hordaland County: — Mr Hallvard BAKKE Labour Party — Ms Grete KNUDSEN Labour Party — Mr Leiv STENSLAND Labour Party — Ms Ranveig FRØILAND Labour Party — Mr Olav AKSELSEN Labour Party — Mr Arne SKAUGE Conservative Party — Mr Arne ALSÅKER SPILDE Conservative Party — Ms Erna SOLBERG Conservative Party — Mr Nils O GOLTEN Conservative Party — Mr Svein ALSAKER Christian Democratic Party — Ms Britt HARKESTAD Christian Democratic Party — Mr Magnus STANGELAND Centre Party — Mr Hans J RØSJORDE Progress Party 35 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 35 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — Mr Knut HANSELMANN Progress Party — Ms Inger-Marie YTTERHORN Progress Party — Ms Kjellbjørg LUNDE Socialist Left Party Møre og Romsdal County: — Mr Rikard OLSVIK Labour Party — Ms Laila KALAND Labour Party — Ms Karita BEKKEMELLEM Labour Party — Mr Anders TALLERAAS Conservative Party — Mr Ingvard SVERDRUP Conservative Party — Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK Christian Democratic Party — Mr Per SÆVIK Christian Democratic Party — Mr Gudmund RESTAD Centre Party — Mr Lodve SOLHOLM Progress Party — Ms Marie L WIDNES Socialist Left Party Nordland County: — Mr Bjarne MØRK EIDEM Labour Party — Ms Ragna BERGET JØRGENSEN Labour Party — Mr Rolf BENDIKSEN Labour Party — Ms Åshild HAUAN Labour Party — Ms Inger PEDERSEN Labour Party — Mr Petter THOMASSEN Conservative Party — Ms Thea KNUTZEN Conservative Party — Mr Dag Jostein FJÆRVOLL Christian Democratic Party Mr Peter ANGELSEN Centre Party — Mr Harry JENSEN Progress Party — Mr Inge MYRVOLL Socialist Left Party — Ms Lisbeth HOLAND Socialist Left Party Nord-Trøndelag County: — Ms Inger Lise GJØRV Labour Party — Mr Roger GUDMUNDSETH Labour Party — Mr Inge STALDVIK Labour Party — Ms Wenche FROGN SELLÆG Conservative Party — Mr Johan J JAKOBSEN Centre Party — Mr Per AUNET Socialist Left Party 36 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 36 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Oppland County: — Mr Haakon BLANKENBORG Labour Party — Ms Berit BRØRBY LARSEN Labour Party — Mr Johan M NYLAND Labour Party — Ms Marie BRENDEN Labour Party — Mr Dag C WEBERG Conservative Party — Mr Syver BERGE Centre Party — Mr Peder I RAMSRUD Progress Party Oslo County: — Ms Gro HARLEM BRUNDTLAND Labour Party — Mr Thorbjørn BERNTSEN Labour Party — Ms Sissel RØNBECK Labour Party — Mr Bjørn Tore GODAL Labour Party — Ms Marit NYBAKK Labour Party — Mr Jan Peder SYSE Conservative Party — Ms Annelise HØEGH Conservative Party — Mr Per-Kristian FOSS Conservative Party — Mr Anders C SJAASTAD Conservative Party — Ms Kristin CLEMET Conservative Party — Ms Eleonore BJARTVEIT Christian Democratic Party — Mr Carl I HAGEN Progress Party — Mr Pål Atle SKJERVENGEN Progress Party — Mr Tor Mikkel WARA Progress Party — Mr Theo KORITZINSKY Socialist Left Party — Ms Kristin HALVORSEN Socialist Left Party Rogaland County: — Mr Gunnar BERGE Labour Party — Ms Gunn Vigdis OLSEN-HAGEN Labour Party — Mr Magnar SÆTRE Labour Party — Mr Gunnar FATLAND Conservative Party — Ms Thorhild WIDVEY Conservative Party — Mr Sverre MAURITZEN Conservative Party — Mr John S TVEIT Christian Democratic Party — Ms Borghild RØYSELAND Christian Democratic Party — Mr Ole Gabriel UELAND Centre Party — Mr Jan SIMONSEN Progress Party 37 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 37 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — Mr Petter BJØRHEIM Progress Party — Mr Eilef A MELAND Socialist Left Party Sogn og Fjordane County: — Mr Kjell OPSETH Labour Party — Ms Astrid M NISTAD Labour Party — Mr Dagfinn HJERTENES Conservative Party — Mr Lars Gunnar LIE Christian Democratic Party — Mr Leiv BLAKSET Centre Party Casino hinckley concerts grand County: — Ms Marit ROTNES Labour Party — Mr Ulf GUTTORMSEN Labour Party — Ms Mary KVIDAL Labour Party — Ms Gunhild ØYANGEN Labour Party — Mr Harald ELLEFSEN Conservative Party — Ms Siri FROST STERRI Conservative Party — Mr Kåre GJØNNES Christian Democratic Party — Ms Tove Kari VIKEN Centre Party — Mr Per RISVIK Progress Party — Mr Erik SOLHEIM Socialist Left Party Telemark County: — Ms Ingeborg BOTNEN Labour Party — Ms Ragnhild BARLAND Labour Party — Mr Ingvald GODAL Conservative Party — Ms Solveig SOLLIE Christian Democratic Party — Mr John Ingolf ALVHEIM Progress Party — Mr Børre RØNNINGEN Socialist Left Party Troms County: — Mr William ENGSETH Labour Party — Ms Ranja HAUGLID Labour Party — Mr Jan H ELVHEIM Labour Party — Mr Svein LUDVIGSEN Conservative Party 38 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 38 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — Mr Terje NYBERGET Progress Party — Mr Rolf Ketil BJØRN Socialist Left Party Vest-Agder County: — Mr Sigurd VERDAL Labour Party — Ms Aud BLATTMANN Labour Party — Mr John G BERNANDER Conservative Party — Mr Jon LILLETUN Christian Democratic Party — Mr Vidar KLEPPE Progress Party Vestfold County: — Mr Ernst WROLDSEN Labour Party — Ms Karin LIAN Labour Party — Mr Jørgen Hårek KOSMO Labour Party — Mr Ole Johs.
BRUNÆS Conservative Party — Ms Ingrid I WILLOCH Conservative Party — Mr Oscar D HILLGAAR Progress Party — Ms Inger D STEEN Socialist Left Party Østfold County: — Mr Gunnar SKAUG Labour Party — Mr Tom THORESEN Labour Party — Ms Åsa SOLBERG Labour Party — Mr Sigurd HOLEMARK Conservative Party — Ms Kjellaug NAKKIM Conservative Party — Mr Odd HOLTEN Christian Democratic Party — Mr Edvard GRIMSTAD Centre Party — Mr Øystein HEDSTRØM Progress Party — Ms Wenche LYNGHOLM Socialist Left Party 39 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 39 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Members of the Norwegian Storting 1993—1997 Akershus County: — Ms Solveig TORSVIK Labour Party — Mr Vidar BJØRNSTAD Labour Party — Mr Kjell ENGEBRETSEN Labour Party — Ms Grethe FOSSLI Labour Party — Ms Anneliese DØRUM Labour Party — Mr Jan Tore SANNER Conservative Party — Ms Kaci KULLMANN FIVE Conservative Party — Mr Jan PETERSEN Conservative Party — Ms Eva R FINSTAD Conservative Party — Ms Valgerd SVARSTAD HAUGLAND Christian Democratic Party — Ms Anne ENGER LAHNSTEIN Centre Party — Mr Fridtjof Frank GUNDERSEN Progress Party — Mr Stephen BRÅTHEN Progress Party — Mr Paul CHAFFEY Socialist Left Party Aust-Agder County: — Ms Brit JØRGENSEN Labour Party — Mr Gunnar HALVORSEN Labour Party — Mr Tore A LILTVED Conservative Party — Mr Terje SANDKJÆR Centre Party Buskerud County: — Mr Erik DALHEIM Labour Party — Ms Kirsti KOLLE GRØNDAHL Labour Party — Mr Thorbjørn JAGLAND Labour Party — Ms Sigrun ENG Labour Party — Mr Hallgrim BERG Conservative Party — Mr Arild HIIM Conservative Party — Mr Per Olaf LUNDTEIGEN Centre Party — Mr Roy WETTERSTAD Progress Party 40 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 40 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Finnmark County: — Ms Mimmi BÆIVI Labour Party — Mr Karl Eirik SCHJØTT-PEDERSEN Labour Party — Mr Reidar JOHANSEN Socialist Left Party — Ms Johanne GAUP Centre Party Hedmark County: — Ms Eirin FALDET Labour Party — Mr Sigbjørn JOHNSEN Labour Party — Ms Sylvia BRUSTAD Labour Party — Mr Einar Olav SKOGHOLT Labour Party — Mr Bjørn HERNÆS Conservative Party — Ms Ragnhild QUESETH HAARSTAD Centre Party — Mr Ola D GLØTVOLD Centre Party — Mr Magnar SORTÅSLØKKEN Socialist Left Party Hordaland County: — Mr Hallvard BAKKE Labour Party — Ms Grete KNUDSEN Labour Party — Ms Rita TVEITEN Labour Party — Ms Ranveig FRØILAND Labour Party — Mr Olav AKSELSEN Labour Party — Mr Oddvar NILSEN Conservative Party — Ms Erna SOLBERG Conservative Party — Mr Are NÆSS Christian Democratic Party — Ms Anita APELTHUN SÆLE Christian Democratic Party — Mr Magnus STANGELAND Centre Party — Ms Bjørg HOPE GALTUNG Centre Party — Mr John DALE Centre Party — Mr Hans J RØSJORDE Progress Party — Ms Kjellbjørg LUNDE Socialist Left Party — Mr Lars SPONHEIM Liberal Party Møre og Romsdal County: — Mr Asmund KRISTOFFERSEN Labour Party — Ms Laila KALAND Pitboss hiring casino Party 41 FORMAL Jeux casino gratuits francais VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 41 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — Ms Karita BEKKEMELLEM Labour Party — Mr Ottar KALDHOL Labour Party — Mr Anders TALLERAAS Conservative Party — Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK Christian Democratic Party — Ms May Helen MOLVÆR GRIMSTAD Christian Democratic Party — Mr Gudmund RESTAD Centre Party — Mr Jørgen HOLTE Centre Party — Ms Eli SOLLIED ØVERAAS Centre Party Nordland County: — Mr Gunnar BREIMO Labour Party — Ms Ragna BERGET JØRGENSEN Labour Party — Ms Hill-Marta SOLBERG Labour Party — Mr Odd ERIKSEN Labour Party — Mr Tomas NORVOLL Labour Party — Mr Petter THOMASSEN Conservative Party — Mr Dag Jostein FJÆRVOLL Christian Democratic Party — Mr Peter ANGELSEN Centre Party — Ms Inga KVALBUKT Centre Party — Mr Odd Roger ENOKSEN Centre Party — Mr Inge MYRVOLL Socialist Left Party — Ms Lisbeth HOLAND Socialist Left Party Nord-Trøndelag County: — Ms Aud GAUNDAL Labour Party — Mr Roger GUDMUNDSETH Labour Party — Mr Jon Olav ALSTAD Labour Party — Ms Marit ARNSTAD Centre Party — Mr Johan J JAKOBSEN Centre Party — Ms Jorunn HAGELER Socialist Left Party Oppland County: — Mr Haakon BLANKENBORG Labour Party — Ms Berit BRØRBY LARSEN Labour Party — Mr Johan M NYLAND Labour Party — Ms Marie BRENDEN Labour Party — Mr Dag C WEBERG Conservative Party 42 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 42 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — Mr Syver BERGE Centre Party — Ms Marit TINGELSTAD Centre Party Oslo County: — Ms Gro HARLEM BRUNDTLAND Labour Party — Mr Thorbjørn BERNTSEN Labour Party — Mr Jens STOLTENBERG Labour Party — Ms Grete FAREMO Labour Party — Mr Bjørn Tore GODAL Labour Party — Ms Marit NYBAKK Labour Party — Mr Jan Peder SYSE Conservative Party — Ms Annelise HØEGH Conservative Party — Mr Per-Kristian FOSS Conservative Party — Ms Kristin KROHN DEVOLD Conservative Party — Mr Anders C SJAASTAD Conservative Party — Mr Arne HAUKVIK Centre Party — Mr Carl I HAGEN Progress Party — Ms Ellen Christine CHRISTIANSEN Progress Party — Mr Erik SOLHEIM Socialist Left Party — Ms Kristin HALVORSEN Socialist Left Party — Mr Erling FOLKVORD Red Electoral Alliance Rogaland County: — Mr Tore NORDTUN Labour Party — Ms Oddbjørg AUSLAND STARRFELT Labour Party — Mr Magnar SÆTRE Labour Party — Mr Gunnar FATLAND Conservative Party — Ms Thorild WIDVEY Conservative Party — Mr Einar STEENSNÆS Christian Democratic Party — Ms Hilde FRAFJORD JOHNSEN Christian Democratic Party — Ms Magnhild MELTVEIT KLEPPA Centre Party — Ms Unn AARRESTAD Centre Party — Mr Jan SIMONSEN Progress Party — Mr Eilef A MELAND Socialist Left Party Sogn og Fjordane County: — Mr Kjell OPSETH Labour Party 43 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 43 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — Ms Astrid M NISTAD Labour Party — Mr Lars Gunnar LIE Christian Democratic Party — Mr Håkon GIIL Centre Party — Ms Jorunn RINGSTAD Centre Party Sør-Trøndelag County: — Mr Ola A RØTVEI Labour Party — Mr Ulf GUTTORMSEN Labour Party — Ms Gunn Karin GJUL Labour Party — Ms Gunhild ØYANGEN Labour Party — Mr Harald ELLEFSEN Conservative Party — Ms Siri FROST STERRI Conservative Party — Mr Ola T LÅNKE Christian Democratic Party — Ms Tove Karin VIKEN Centre Party — Mr Morten LUND Centre Party — Mr Øystein DJUPEDAL Socialist Left Party Telemark County: — Mr Sigvald OPPEBØEN HANSEN Labour Party — Ms Ragnhild BARLAND Labour Party — Mr Bent HEGNA Labour Party — Mr Ingvald GODAL Conservative Party — Mr Terje RIIS JOHANSEN Centre Party — Ms Solveig SOLLIE Christian Democratic Party — Mr John Ingolf ALVHEIM Progress Party — Mr Børre RØNNINGEN Socialist Left Party Troms County: — Mr William ENGSETH Labour Party — Ms Ranja Https://chakefashion.com/casino/silversands-casino-hidden-coupons.html Labour Party — Mr Tor NYMO Centre Party — Ms Rita ROALDSEN Centre Party — Mr Svein LUDVIGSEN Conservative Party — Mr Rolf Ketil BJØRN Socialist Left Party 44 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 44 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Vest-Agder County: — Mr Rolf Terje KLUNGELAND Labour Party — Ms Aud BLATTMANN Labour Party — Mr Ansgar GABRIELSEN Conservative Party — Mr Sigurd MANNERÅK Centre Party — Mr Jon LILLETUN Christian Democratic Party Vestfold County: — Ms Anne Helen RUI Labour Party — Ms Karin LIAN Labour Party — Mr Jørgen Hårek KOSMO Labour Party — Mr Ole Johs.
BRUNÆS Conservative Party — Mr Arild LUND Conservative Party — Ms Eva LIAN Centre Party — Mr Oscar D HILLGAAR Progress Party Østfold County: — Mr Gunnar SKAUG Labour Party — Mr Tom THORESEN Labour Party — Ms Ane Sofie TØMMERÅS Labour Party — Ms Signe ØYE Labour Party — Ms Kjellaug NAKKIM Conservative Party — Mr Odd HOLTEN Christian Democratic Party — Mr Edvard GRIMSTAD Centre Party — Mr Øystein HEDSTRØM Progress Party 45 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 45 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Members of the Norwegian Storting 1997—2001 Labour Party 65 representatives : Chairman: Ms Hill-Marta SOLBERG Deputy Chairman: Mr Tom THORESEN Secretary: Ms Berit BRØRBY Members: Mr Dag Terje ANDERSEN, Mr Vidar BJØRNSTAD, Mr Haakon BLANKENBORG, Ms Grethe FOSSLI, Mr Tore NORDTUN, Mr Kjell OPSETH, Mr Ola RØTVEI, Mr Gunnar SKAUG, Ms Oddbjørg STARRFELT, Ms Gunhild ØYANGEN.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — Ms Inger Lise HUSØY, Oslo County member of the Lagting — Mr Einar JOHANSEN, Finnmark County — Ms Laila KALAND, Møre og Romsdal County Lagting member — Mr Ottar KALDHOL, Møre og Romsdal County — Ms Karin KJØLMOEN, Nord-Trøndelag County — Ms Synnøve KONGLEVOLL, Troms County — Mr Rune E KRISTIANSEN, Oslo County — Mr Asmund KRISTOFFERSEN, Møre og Romsdal County — Mr Frank Willy LARSEN, Buskerud County — Ms Karin LIAN, Vestfold County — Ms Rikke LIND, Akershus County — Mr Leif LUND, Hordaland County member of the Lagting — Ms Liv Marit MOLAND, Aust-Agder County member of the Lagting — Mr Sverre MYRLI, Akershus County — Ms Astrid Marie NISTAD, Sogn og Fjordane County justice — Mr Tore NORDSETH, Sør-Trøndelag County — Mr Tore NORDTUN, Rogaland County — MR Tomas NORVOLL, Nordland County — Ms Marit NYBAKK, Oslo County — Ms Gunn OLSEN, Telemark County — Mr Kjell OPSETH, Sogn og Fjordane County — Ms Torny PEDERSEN, Nordland County — Mr Jan Petter RASMUSSEN, Rogaland County justice — Mr Torstein RUDIHAGEN, Oppland County member of the Lagting — Ms Anne Helen RUI, Vestfold County member of the Lagtingnurse — Mr Ola RØTVEI, Sør-Trøndelag County member of the Lagting — Mr Einar Olav SKOGHOLT, Hedmark County Lagting member — Ms Hill-Marta SOLBERG, Nordland County — Ms Oddbjørg AUSDAL STARRFELT, Rogaland County health care — Mr Tariq SHAHBAZ, Oslo County — Mr Tom THORESEN, Østfold County — Ms Rita TVEITEN, Hordaland County — Ms Ane Sofie TØMMERÅS, Østfold County justice — Ms Gunhild ØYANGEN, Sør-Trøndelag County — Ms Signe ØYE, Østfold County Progress Party 25 representatives : Chairman: Mr Carl I HAGEN Vice-Chairman: Mr John I ALVHEIM Secretary: Mr Øystein HEDSTRØM 47 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 47 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Members: Mr Hans J RØSJORDE, Mr Øyvind VAKSDAL, Mr Per Ove WIDTH — Mr John I ALVHEIM, Telemark County nurse — Mr Torbjørn ANDERSEN, Aust-Agder County — Mr Per Roar BREDVOLD, Hedmark County — Mr Dag DANIELSEN, Oslo County — Ms Ursula EVJE, Akershus County — Mr Fridtjof Frank GUNDERSEN, Akershus County — Mr Carl I HAGEN, Oslo County — Mr Øystein HEDSTRØM, Østfold County — Ms Siv JENSEN, Oslo County — Mr Vidar KLEPPE, Vest-Agder County member of the Lagting — Mr Terje KNUDSEN, Hordaland County — Mr Ulf Erik KNUDSEN, Buskerud County — Mr Øyvind KORSBERG, Troms County member of the Lagting — Mr Per Erik MONSEN, Vestfold County member of the Lagting — Mr Harald Tom NESVIK, Møre og Romsdal County — Mr Thore Aksel NISTAD, Oppland County — Mr Hans J RØSJORDE, Hordaland County member of the Lagting — Mr Per SANDBERG, Nord-Trøndelag County — Mr Jan SIMONSEN, Rogaland County justice — Mr Lodve SOLHOLM, Møre og Romsdal County — Mr Jørn L STANG, Østfold County justice — Mr Christopher STENSAKER, Sør-Trøndelag County Lagting — Mr Kenneth SVENDSEN, Nordland County — Mr Øyvind VAKSDAL, Rogaland County — Mr Per Ove WIDTH, Vestfold County member of the Lagting Christian Democratic Party 25 representatives : Chairman: Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK Vice-Chairman: Mr Einar STEENSNÆS Members: Ms Valgerd SVARSTAD HAUGLAND, Mr Odd HOLTEN, Ms Randi KARLSTRØM, Mr Ola T LÅNKE, Ms Anita APELTHUN SÆLE Deputy members: Ms Åse Gunhild WOIE DUESUND, Ms May-Helen MOLVÆR GRIMSTAD, Ms Rigmor KOFOED-LARSEN, Mr Gunnar LIE, Mr Are NÆSS, Mr Ivar ØSTBERG — Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK, Møre og Romsdal County — Ms Åse Gunhild WOIE DUESUND, Aust-Agder County — Ms May-Helen MOLVÆR GRIMSTAD, Møre og Romsdal County 48 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 48 by Wilh.
BRUNÆS, Vestfold County member of the Lagting — Ms Kristin KROHN DEVOLD, Oslo County justice — Mr Per Kristian FOSS, Oslo County — Mr Ansgar GABRIELSEN, Vest-Agder County — Mr Ingvald GODAL, Telemark County — Mr Trond HELLELAND, Buskerud County — Mr Bjørn HERNÆS, Hedmark County justice — Mr Sverre J HODDEVIK, Sogn og Fjordane County — Ms Annelise HØEGH, Oslo County — Mr Bent HØIE, Rogaland County — Mr Ivar KRISTIANSEN, Nordland County 49 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 49 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — Mr Svein LUDVIGSEN, Troms County member of the Lagting — Mr Inge LØNNING, Oslo County — Mr Petter LØVIK, Møre og Romsdal County member of the Lagting — Ms Kjellaug NAKKIM, Østfold County — Mr Oddvard NILSEN, Hordaland County — Mr Jan PETERSEN, Akershus County — Mr Jan Tore SANNER, Akershus County — Ms Sonja Irene SJØLI, Akershus County Lagting membernurse — Ms Erna SOLBERG, Hordaland County — Ms Siri FROST STERRI, Sør-Trøndelag County Lagting member — Ms Inger STOLT-NIELSEN, Rogaland County Lagting member Centre Party 11 representatives : Chairman: Mr Odd Roger ENOKSEN Members: Mr Morten LUND, Ms Jorunn RINGSTAD, Ms Marit TINGELSTAD Deputy members: Mr John DALE, Mr Johan J JAKOBSEN — Mr John DALE, Hordaland County member of the Lagting — Mr Odd Roger ENOKSEN, Nordland County — Mr Ola D GLØTVOLD, Hedmark County member of the Lagting — Mr Johan J JAKOBSEN, Nord-Trøndelag County — Ms Magnhild MELTVEIT KLEPPA, Rogaland County — Ms Anne ENGER LAHNSTEIN, Akershus County — Mr Morten LUND, Sør-Trøndelag County — Mr Tor NYMO, Troms County justice — Mr Gudmund RESTAD, Møre og Romsdal County — Ms Jorunn RINGSTAD, Sogn og Fjordane County — Ms Marit TINGELSTAD, Oppland County member of the Lagting Socialist Left Party 9 representatives : Chairman: Ms Kristin HALVORSEN Vice-Chairman: Ms Karin ANDERSEN Members: Mr Hallgeir H LANGELAND, Mr Rolf REIKVAM Deputy member: Øystein DJUPEDAL — Ms Karin ANDERSEN, Hedmark County — Mr Olav Gunnar BALLO, Finnmark County physician — Mr Øystein DJUPEDAL, Sør-Trøndelag County 50 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 50 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — Ms Kristin HALVORSEN, Oslo County — Mr Hallgeir H LANGELAND, Rogaland County — Mr Inge MYRVOLL, Nordland County member of the Lagting — Mr Rolf REIKVAM, Akershus County — Ms Lisbet RUGTVEDT, Oslo County — Ms Ågot VALLE, Hordaland County health care Liberal Party 6 representatives : Chairman: Mr Lars SPONHEIM Vice-Chairman: Mr Gunnar KVASSHEIM — Mr Odd Einar Click, Oslo County — Mr Terje JOHANSEN, Akershus County member of the Lagting — Mr Leif Helge KONGSHAUG, Møre og Romsdal County — Mr Gunnar KVASSHEIM, Rogaland County — Mr Lars SPONHEIM, Hordaland County — Ms May Britt VIHOVDE, Hordaland County member of the Lagting Non-Partisan Representatives 1 representative : — Mr Steinar BASTESEN, Nordland County The Storting representatives from Møre og Romsdal County are, in this connection, particularly interesting: — Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK Christian Democratic Party — Ms May-Helen MOLVÆR GRIMSTAD Christian Democratic Party — Ms Laila KALAND Labour Party — Ms Karita BEKKEMELLEM ORHEIM Labour Party — Mr Asmund KRISTOFFERSEN Labour Party — Mr Lodve SOLHOLM Progress Party — Mr Harald Tom NESVIK Progress Party — Mr Gudmund RESTAD Centre Partyformer police officer — Mr Leif Helge KONGSHAUG Liberal Party — Mr Petter LØVIK Conservative Party 51 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 51 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Deputy representatives for the Labour Party in Møre og Romsdal County: — Mr Ottar KALDHOL, Ulstein — Mr Kjell Terje FEVÅG, Kristiansund — Ms Grethe BJØRLO, Ålesund — Mr Jan SILSETH, Sunndal — Mr Bernhard RIKSFJORD, Aukra — Ms Gudny FAGERHOL, Ørsta Deputy representatives for the Christian Democratic Party in Møre og Romsdal County: — Mr Modulf AUKAN, Tustna — Ms Anne Lise LUNDE, Stranda — Mr Svein Atle ROSETH, Nesset — Ms Reidun VIGESTAD BERGE, Ørsta — Mr Magnar HEGGERNES police officerVanylven Deputy representatives for the Progress Party in Møre og Romsdal County: — Ms Gerd FLADSET, Averøy — Mr Arve Hans OTTERLEI, Fræna — Mr Jan Steinar ENGELI JOHANSEN, Averøy — Mr Oscar Jarle GRIMSTAD, Hareid — Mr Gustav HAREIDE physicianÅlesund Deputy representatives for the Conservative Party in Møre og Romsdal County: — Mr Dagfinn RIPNES, Kristiansund — Ms Elisabeth RØBEKK NØRVE, Ålesund — Mr Lars RAMSTAD, Rauma — Ms Marianne HOFSETH, Ålesund Deputy representatives for jatekok ingyen casinos Centre Party in Møre og Romsdal County: — Mr Jørgen HOLTE, Volda — Ms Eli SOLLIED ØVERAAS, Vestnes — Mr Per Ivar LIED aspirant Ministry of Foreign AffairsStranda 52 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 52 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — Ms Else BRANDVOLL ANDRESEN, Surnadal Deputy representatives cherokee casino in siloam springs ar the Liberal Party in Møre og Romsdal County: — Ms Aud FOLKESTAD, Stranda — Ms Sylvia HAMMERSVIK, Molde — Mr Arne Birger TUNHEIM, Giske — Mr Iver G NORDSETH, Smøla Members of the Norwegian Storting 2001—2005 Aust-Agder County: — ANDERSEN Torbjørn Progress Party — DUESUND WOIE Åse Gunhild Christian Democratic Party — HALVORSEN Gunnar Labour Party — OLSEN Jan Olav Conservative Party Vest-Agder County: — ANDERSEN Anne Berit Conservative Party — ERIKSEN Dagrun Christian Democratic Party — GITMARK Peter Conservative Partystand-in for Mr Ansgar GABRIELSEN — KLUNGLAND Rolf Terje Labour Party — LILLETUN Jon Christian Democratic Party Akershus Website montreal casino — ARNØY HALL Siri Socialist Left Party — BJØRNSTAD Vidar Labour Party — CHRISTIANSEN Julie Conservative Party — DAHL André Conservative Partystand-in for Mr Jan PETERSEN — ENGEBRETSEN Kjell Labour Party — EVJE Ursula Progress Party — FOSSLI Grethe Labour Party — HAGA Åslaug Centre Party 53 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 53 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — HOLSTAD Einar Christian Democratic Partystand-in for Ms Valgerd S HAUGLAND — HØGLUND Morten Progress Party — KVAKKESTAD André Progress Party — ONARHEIM Leif Frode Conservative Party — REIKVAM Rolf Socialist Left Party — SANNER Jan Tore Conservative Party — SJØLI Sonja Irene Conservative Party Buskerud County: — BERGO LUND Magnar Socialist Left Party — ENG Sigrun Labour Party — HELLELAND Trond Conservative Party — HUNDHAMMER HEIEREN Beate Conservative Party — JAGLAND Thorbjørn Labour Party — KNUDSEN Ulf Erik Progress Party — MARTHINSEN Finn Kristian Christian Democratic Party Finnmark County: — BALLO Olav Gunnar Socialist Left Party — NIELSEN Eva Labour Party — ROBERTSEN Raymond Conservative Party — SCHJØTT-PEDERSEN Karl Eirik Labour Party Hedmark County: — ANDERSEN Karin Socialist Left Party — BREDVOLD Per Roar Progress Party — BRUSTAD Sylvia Labour Party — FALDET Eirin Labour Party — GLØTVOLD Ola Centre Party — HERNÆS Bjørn Conservative Party — STORBERGET Knut Labour Party — WISLØFF-NILSSEN Åse Christian Democratic Party 54 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 54 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Hordaland County: — AKSELSEN Olav Labour Party — EKELAND Silja Conservative Partystand-in for Ms Erna SOLBERG — FRØILAND Ranveig Labour Party — HAGESÆTER Gjermund Progress Party — HALLERAKER Øyvind Conservative Party — HANSEN Torbjørn Conservative Party — LJONES Ingmar Christian Democratic Party — LUND Leif Labour Party — LYSBAKKEN BJØRLO Audun Socialist Left Party — NILSEN Oddvard Conservative Party — SKJÆLAAEN Rune Centre Party — SORTEVIK Arne Progress Party — SÆLE APELTHUN Anita Christian Democratic Party — SØRFONN Ingebrigt Christian Democratic Party — VALLE Ågot Socialist Left Party — VIHOVDE May Britt Liberal Partystand-in for Mr Lars SPONHEIM — WOLDSETH S Karin Progress Party Møre og Romsdal County: — AUKAN Modulf Christian Democratic Partystand-in for Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK — GRIMSTAD MOLVÆR May-Helen Christian Democratic Party — JACOBSEN Bjørn Socialist Left Party — KRISTOFFERSEN Asmund Labour Party — LØVIK Petter Conservative Party — NESVIK T Harald Progress Party — NØRVE RØBEKK Elisabeth Conservative Party — ORHEIM BEKKEMELLEM Karita Labour Party — SOLHOLM Lodve Progress Party — ØVERAAS SOLLIED Eli Centre Party Nordland County: — BASTESEN Steinar Coastal Party — ELLINGSEN Jan Arild Progress Party — ELVIK Åsa Socialist Left Party 55 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 55 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — ENOKSEN Odd Roger Centre Party — HANSEN Geir-Ketil Socialist Left Party — KRISTIANSEN Ivar Conservative Party — PEDERSEN Torny Labour Party — SAHL Jan Christian Democratic Party — SOLBERG Hill-Marta Labour Party — STRØM Tor-Arne Labour Party — SVENDSEN Kenneth Progress Party — VOIE Søren Fredrik Conservative Party Oppland County: — BJØRKLUND Kjetil Socialist Left Party — BLANKENBORG Haakon Labour Party — BRØRBY Berit Labour Party read article ENGER Inger S Centre Party — NISTAD Thore A Progress Party — RUDIHAGEN Torstein Labour Party — THOMMESSEN Olemic Conservative Party Oslo County: — ERIKSEN Ine-Marie Conservative Partystand-in for Mr Per-K FOSS — FROYN Bjørgulv Labour Party — GRANDE SKEI Trine Liberal Partystand-in for Mr Odd E DØRUM — HAGEN Carl I Progress Party — HALVORSEN Kristin Socialist Left Party — HILDENG Britt Labour Party — HOLMÅS Heikki Socialist Left Party — JENSEN Siv Progress Party — KJÆSTAD Hans R Conservative Partystand-in for Ms Kristin K DEVOLD — LARSSEN Heidi Conservative Party — LØNNING Inge Conservative Party — NYBAKK Marit Labour Party — RAFIQ Afshan Conservative Party — RISE Lars Christian Democratic Party — STOLTENBERG Jens Labour Party — SØRENSEN Heidi Socialist Left Party 56 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 56 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Rogaland County: — GJEDREM Olaf Christian Democratic Partystand-in for Mr Einar STEENSNÆS — HØIE Bent Conservative Party — KLEPPA MELTVEIT Magnhild Centre Party — LANGELAND Hallgeir H Socialist Left Party — MELING Siri A Conservative Party — NORDTUN Tore Labour Party — SIMONSEN Jan independent — STARRFELT AUSDAL Oddbjørg Labour Party — TØRRESDAL Bjørg Christian Democratic Party — VAKSDAL Øyvind Progress Party — VALLERSNES Finn Martin Conservative Party Sogn og Fjordane County: — HODDEVIK Sverre Conservative Party — RINGSTAD Jorunn Centre Party — RØYS GRANDE Heidi Socialist Left Party — OSMUNDNES Per Steinar Christian Democratic Partystand-in for Mr Magne AARØEN — SANDAL Reidar Labour Party Telemark County: — ALVHEIM John I Progress Party — HANSEN OPPEBØEN Sigvald Labour Party — HOLMBERG Kari Lise Conservative Party — MOLVIK Sigbjørn Socialist Left Party — OLSEN Gunn Labour Party — RAHM Bror Yngve Christian Democratic Party Troms County: — ARNESEN Bendiks H Labour Party — JENSEN Lena Socialist Left Party — KONGLEVOLL Synnøve Labour Party — KONRADSEN Åge Conservative Party 57 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 57 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — KORSBERG Øyvind Progress Party — ØSTBERG Ivar Christian Democratic Party Nord-Trøndelag County: — X casino 2 Marit Centre Party — GAUNDAL Aud Labour Party — HANSSEN Bjarne Håkon Labour Party — LYNGSTAD Arne Christian Democratic Party — RYAN Inge Socialist Left Party — SANDBERG Per Progress Party Sør-Trøndelag County: — DJUPEDAL Øystein Socialist Left Party — GISKE Trond Labour Party — GJUL Gunn Karin Labour Party — HOFSTAD Linda Cathrine Conservative Partystand-in for Mr Børge BRENDE — LUND Morten Centre Party — LÅNKE Ola T Christian Democratic Party — MALVIK VAGGEN Ingvild Socialist Left Party — MOMYR Michael Conservative Party — STENSAKER Christopher Progress Party — ØYANGEN Gunhild Labour Party Vestfold County: — FLÅTTEN Svein Conservative Party — HOGSNES Hans Kristian Conservative Party — KOSMO Jørgen Hårek Labour Party — MONSEN Per Erik Progress Party — RUI Anne Helen Labour Party — SKARBØVIK Elsa Christian Democratic Party — THORKILDSEN Inga Marte Socialist Left Party — WIDTH Per Ove Progress Party 58 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 58 by Wilh.
The criminal inclination, unfairness, grave disrespect for the human rights and general ignominy persistently displayed by the official royal family of Norway in this case, clearly excludes friendly and even diplomatic relations with them 68 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 68 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report cf Aphorisms 135, 136 and 137 etc.
His aides-de-camp was: Mr Ulf Erik HUSEBØ, Mr Jørgen BERGGRAV, Mr Jon RIKTER-SVENDSEN, Mr Kai Ole HOLTER, Ms Anne RYDNING, Mr Per Hermann BODAL and Mr Terje ÅGREN, respectively.
His aides-de-camp was: Mr Petter Andreas ASK, Mr Tor Arnt SANDLI, Mr Ole SANNES, Mr Nils Petter GRANHOLT, Mr Per HØIBY and Ms Merete Kristine GUNDERSEN, respectively.
His aides-de-camp was: Mr Bjørn RUUD, Https://chakefashion.com/casino/casino-night-party-costumes.html Ulf Erik HUSEBØ, Mr Øivind BERGENE, Mr Jørgen BERGGRAV, Mr Gunnar Torgny STOKLAND, Mr Anders RANGUL and Ms Anne RYDNING, respectively.
His aides-de-camp was: Mr Ulf Erik HUSEBØ, Mr Jørgen BERGGRAV, Mr Jon RIKTER-SVENDSEN, Mr Kai Ole HOLTER, Mr Per-Hermann BODAL, Mr Terje ÅGREN and Ms Anne RYDNING, respectively.
For penological etc reasons, the criminaloids Mr Werner CHRISTIE, Ms Grete FAREMO and Ms Grete KNUDSEN should be singled out.
As regards the president of the villainous kangaroo court, 70 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 70 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Mr Ivar OFTEDAHL, there still circulates a fistful incensing anecdotes in NO- Molde illustrating his goatish show-off, lawlessness, heavy drinking and gene- rally bunglesome demeanor etc.
According to Article 1 in the WHO Constitution the objective of the organi- zation shall be the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health, and in order to achieve this objective Article 2 the functions of the organization shall be: 71 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 71 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report a to act as the directing and co-ordinating authority on international health work; b to establish and maintain effective collaboration with the United Nations, specialized agencies, governmental health administrations, professional groups and such other organizations as may be deemed appropriate; c to assist governments, upon request, in strengthening health services.
Whoever eats their eggs will die, and when one is broken, an adder is hatched.
Their cobwebs are useless for clothing; they cannot cover themselves with what they make.
Their deeds are evil deeds, and acts of violence are in their hands.
Their feet rush into sin; they are swift to shed innocent blood.
Their thoughts are evil thoughts; ruin and destruction mark their ways.
The way of peace they do not know; there is no justice in their paths.
They have turned them into crooked roads; no-one who walks in them will know peace.
Amongst the many malefactors exerting themselves to harm me all these years, we also find Mr Lars FRØNSDAL b Dec 01, 1945 — one of the alcoholized, drug abusing and markedly perverted public prosecutors in Oslo.
Mr Frønsdal may assuredly embrace his Mary Jane — or another lady, crack his flasks, be on the hog, speed downtown, lick his stamps, buy junk from Charlie, ride high on a good horse, practice space-basing, enjoy his swipes, hunt Mars hares in civic greens and have a few buttons missing without interference from me.
Subsequent to his unapparelled stunt, Mr Frønsdal was badly in need of a seemingly plausible alibi explaining his rather amusing comportment.
As might be expected of a desperate and debauched boozer in such an unpleasant situation, the warped public prosecutor devoured this alternative explanation hook, line and sinker!
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report cocaethylene thus produced by the liver is strongly addictive and may affect the heart lethally.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Mr Per WAAGE Mr Morten YGGESETH Mr Odd H ØSTEBØ At the office of the Norwegian PM in Akersgata 42, OsloMs Gro Harlem Brundtland, we should notice some of those mentioned are without guilt in this specific case : — Ms Inger ANDERSEN — Mr Dag BERGGRAV — Mr Ole BERREFJORD — Mr Per Arne BJERKE — Ms Torill ENGSETH — Mr Trond FEVOLDEN — Mr Bjørn T GRYDELAND — Ms Målfrid AA.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Mr Werner Go here Mr Leif T ELDRING Mr Eystein ERIKSEN Mr Ulf ERTZAAS Mr Steffen FELBERG Mr Jørgen FLOOD Mr Erling FOSSE Ms Inger M FRIDHOV Mr Johan FROM Ms Anne FRØSTRUP Mr Per GAMMELGÅRD Ms Hilde GAARDER Mr Ole HAFNOR Mr Harald T HAMBORG Mr Yngve HAMMERLIN Mr Gunnar HARR Mr Geir HAUGSTVEIT Mr Torgeir HEIMLI Mr Jan T HELLIESEN Mr Christian F HORST Ms Kari JENSEN Mr John JOHANSSON Mr Jon KAPELRUD Ms Ingelin KILLENGREEN Mr Arnulf KJÆSETH Ms Sissel KOFOED Mr Per O KVAM Ms Wenche KVERNELAND Mr Asbjørn LANGÅS Mr Johannes LARSEN Mr Kåre LEIKSETT Mr Tor LØKKEN Mr Tor MEHL Mr Kristian MØRKØRE Mr Arild NESDAL Mr Stein L NILSEN Mr Knut OLSGAARD Mr Stein OWE Mr Vidar REFVIK Ms Marit ROSSEHAUG Mr Morten RUUD Mr Ivar SIMASTUEN Mr Kaare SINGSAAS 77 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 77 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — Ms Grethe HAMMARQVIST — Mr Rolf HANSEN — Mr Bodolf HAREIDE NB!
KOMPELIEN — Mr Petter KRAMÅS — Mr Alfred KVALHEIM — Ms Heidi LANGAAS — Ms Unni LUND — Ms Lisbeth LØCHEN — Mr Thomas MAURITZEN — Mr Torbjørn MORK — Mr Knut MUNCH-SØEGAARD — Mr Arnt MYHRER — Ms Unn NICOLAYSEN — Ms Randi NILSEN — Mr Jon O NORBOM — Mr Leif NORLI — Ms Trine NORMANN — Ms Construction casino hard rock ottawa O NYGÅRD — Ms Synnøve NYMO — Mr Øystein OPDAHL — Ms Anne ORTH — Mr Reidar RAND — Ms Aase ROKVAM — Mr Mons RUD — Mr Jan RØSEGG — Mr Harald SALVESEN — Ms Ellen SEIP — Mr Ketil SKOGEN — Mr Bjarne STRAND — Ms Laila B STUB 79 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 79 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report — Ms Eli SUNDBY — Ms Liv SUNNANÅ — Mr Øyvind SÆBØ — Ms Kari SØNDERLAND — Ms Liv TELLE — Ms Ellen M THORBJØRNSRUD — Mr Jan TVEDT — Mr Kåre TØNNESEN — Ms Gerd M VANDESKOG — Ms Elisabeth VAAGEN — Ms Tove VEIERØD — Ms Britt VENNER — Ms Mette WALAAS — Mr Reidar ØKLAND — Ms Rikka ØSTBYE — Mr Roger ØSTBØL — Mr Ketil ØSTVEDT — Ms Ingrunn AALVIK — Mr Hans J ÅNSTAD NB!
As soon as I went outside e.
It soon became unmistakably clear the police et al systematically recorded in- formation about my quotidian affairs — there was comprehensive recitals of decent conversations with in every respects estimable octogenarians, and de- scriptions of trifling everyday incidents without the slightest affinity to crimi- nality or otherwise blameworthy behavior.
The worldly ambassadors of Satanic hate and excruciating iniquity, the putrid malevolence exhibited by my Norwegian adversaries was no surprise how- ever — they merely proceeded along the extirpating course exactly mapped very well in advance!
The continuous provocations waged by the cops the last week of December 1992 and the first half of January 1993, included a number of break-ins and illegal searches — As I informed various persons — e.
Consequently — January 14th — two country policemen employed by the sheriff office in Brattvåg and accompanied by a female council physician wedged their way into my living room in order to imprison me at the formerly described, political calaboose at NO-Hjelset!
Arriving the wretched devildom at Hjelset, I had an introductory parley with the enemy collaborating physician, Mr Knut DROTTNING.
As regards aforesaid Mr Magnus AASHEIM, he steadfastly stuck to his scelerate monkey business encompassing v.
Mr Øyehaug was a bonhomous and rather altruistic fellow with certain family ties to the Brattvåg-region — although his dipsomania significantly undermined his attorneyship etc once in a while, he was — purely ethically spoken — number one amongst contemporary lawyers in Molde.
By inhibiting the hydrolytic- catalytic action of the enzyme cholinesterase — i.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report functions of the neurons, neuroleptic drugs — and cholinergic antagonists on the whole — are notorious for their explicit psychosomimetic properties.
Blockading the dopamine receptors and woefully overturning v.
The hypothalamic nuclei controlling the anterior lobe of the pituitary — the adenohypophysis — do so by synthesizing substances entering the portal system and thus activating the glandular cells of the pituitary.
The adenohypophysis secrets v.
The neurohypophysis produces and secrets e.
The hypothalamic hormones are v.
All neurons elaborating hypophysiotropic hormones are influenced by the hypothalamic neurotransmitters — e.
When the state paid molesters at the political dungeon at NO-Hjelset realized Mr Øyehaug and I planned to bring an action against the Norwegian Ministry of Social Affairs, they forthrightly — only slightly delayed by a few conspiratio- nal conversations — decided to intoxicate me with perphenazine.
So — accompanied by further and most extensive corruption of my "medical record" etc, Mr Aasheim and his scummy accomplices made a feverish and arrantly blackhearted effort to chemically stir up genuine daftness and signifi- cantly impair my sturdy health and dianoetic capacity.!
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report mass of the fungus Claviceps purpurea infecting rye and some other grasses — contains several poisonous alkaloids causing ergotism.
Aforementioned action against the Ministry of Social Affairs had been laid to July 22nd, 1993 — "Case 83-175 A.
The situational putrescence considered, we had no hope whatsoever impartial and otherwise competent doomsmen should be appointed — and our gloomy expectations was duly confirmed: As president of the superbly damnable kangaroo court had been installed Mr Finn LYNGHJEM cf Doc 377, entries of May 13, 1998 and Nov 07, 2000 — a professional double-dealer and duffer symptomatically serving as chairman of the state operated committee notoriously supposed to check over the "formal legality" of compulsory commitments and forced drugging etc undertaken by Norwegian officials, and as lay judges was telltalely picked out the Nazi-sympathizing lobotomy- advocate Mr Karl-Ewerth HORNEMAN NO-Trondheim — a formerly police employed fogy-bogie and skull-jinx obnoxiously given to public adulte- ration, and Mr Arild HUNSTAD NO-Ålesund — at that time a subordinate physician wholly directed by Ms Åse SVENDSEN ROLAND cf pp 24—25the sexually perverted and sadistic head of the psychiatric lockup where he was permanently employed.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report § 60.
Furthermore; § 107 ib explicitly lays down that ".
If he thereby caused or was accessory to causing any person to be wrongfully subjected to penalty or to a greater penalty than he deserved, he shall be liable to imprisonment for a term not less than two years.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report If the felony has resulted in the execution of a death sentence or the serving of a custodial sentence for more than five years, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 21 years may be imposed.
Cf §§ 275 and 276 § 120; If a public servant in any record pertaining to his office makes a false entry or conceals the truth, or if he in preparing any official copy, telegram or telephone message or in stamping, marking or any other official attestation which is issued to serve as evidence makes or attests any false statement or conceals the truth, he shall be liable to loss of office or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years, but not exceeding six years if he has acted for the purpose of obtaining for himself or another an unlawful gain or injuring any person.
Cf §§ 116, 117, 123, 124, 275 and 276 ib § 275; Any person who, for the purpose of obtaining for himself or another an unlawful gain or inflicting damage, neglects another person's affairs which he manages or supervises or act against the other person's interests shall be guilty of breach of trust.
The penalty for breach of trust is imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years.
Fines may be imposed in addition to a sentence of imprison- ment.
An accomplice shall be liable to the same penalty.
Under especially extenuating circumstances fines alone may be imposed.
A penalty pursuant to this section shall not be applicable to an act that comes under section 255, cf section 256.
§ 276; The penalty for gross breach of trust is imprisonment for a term not exceeding six years.
Fines may be imposed in addition to a sentence of imprisonment.
An accomplice shall be liable to the same penalty.
In deciding whether a breach of trust is gross, special regard shall be paid to whether the act has caused considerable economic damage, whether it has been committed by a public official or any other person by a breach of the special confidence placed in him as a consequence of his position or activity, whether the offender has kept false accounts or books or has destroyed, damaged, or concealed accounts, books or other documents, or whether he has knowingly caused material loss or danger to another person's life or health.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report A complex case drenched with conventionally aggravating circumstances, accumulation, concurrence and uncommon constellations otherwise entailing increased penalty, the following sections of the Norwegian Penal Code has particular interest for the assessment of sentence: § 62; If any person has by one or more acts committed more than one felony or misdemeanour punishable by imprisonment or detention, a joint cus- todial sentence shall be imposed which must be more severe than the highest minimum penalty prescribed for any of the felonies or misdem- eanors and must in no case exceed the highest penalty prescribed for any of them by more than 50 percent.
The think, cheating casinos have custodial penalty shall normally take the form of imprisonment when any criminal acts would have been punishable thereby.
The provisions of the first paragraph shall apply correspondingly if a joint sentence of community service is imposed.
If community service is imposed as well as unconditional sentence of imprisonment, in ass- essing the sentence of community service the unconditional sentence of imprisonment shall be taken into account.
If any of the felonies or misdemeanours should have been punished by imprisonment, the same supplementary penalties shall be imposed in the case of detention as would have applied in the case of imprisonment.
§ 63; If any person has by one or more acts committed more than one felony or misdemeanour punishable by fines, a joint fine shall be imposed which must be more severe than that which any one of the felonies or misdemeanours should have incurred.
The court may, when some of the felonies or misdemeanours should have been punished by a custodial sentence and others by fines, regard the felonies or misdemeanours for which fines are prescribed as aggra- vating circumstances instead of pronouncing sentence for them.
As his legal representative, the Norwegian Attorney-General — Mr Bjørn HAUG — had appointed assistant lawyer Ms Bergljot WEBSTER.
It's perfectly clear Ms Webster and Ms Hanne Harlem indulged in numerous and unmistakably conspirational conversations the weeks and days before att- ingent court case.
During the theatrical questioning of Ms Svendsen Roland, my lawyer — Mr Øyehaug — and I was forebodingly chased out of the fetid court room.
When it comes to myself, I hung around the first day of the fateful lawsuit only.
Soundly aware the satanic machination partaken by the rotten jury, my pro forma presence fostered "certain supranational objectives".
Carrying the signatures of Mr Lynghjem, Mr Horneman and Mr Hunstad, the sublunar judgment conclusion is nothing read article a most mephitic and verbatim re- production of the acutely stinking humbug opportunistically fabricated by aforesaid Mr Aasheim and Mr Møller.
The allegation on page 1 of the flag- itious libel — stating that the parties and legal representatives of the mock proceeding beforehand had been informed about the identity of the appointed jurors and that no objections as regards the composition of the kangaroo court had been submitted — is tactical fiddle-faddling.
It should be rather unnecessary to bring home the corrupted and wholly scanda- lous "judgment conclusion" is thoroughly and legally invalid — 88 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 88 by Wilh.
Administering 4560-RP to test animals and persons about to undergo operative chirurgery, Mr Laborit discovered that systemic stress and presurgical anxiety was significantly reduced, and thus concluded he was dealing with a chemical powerfully influencing the central nervous system and autonomic functions.
Discovered and first synthesized Oct 3rd and Dec 11th 1950, respectively, 4560- RP i.
From June 1952 chlor- svenske casino sider was commonly prescribed by French physicians.
In any case it takes at least 5000 — five thousand — compactly composed pages to give a scientifically commendable description of the pathogenic attributes substantially assignable to perphenazine.
I shall nevertheless venture to launch a resolutely abridged sketch indicating some of the baneful side effects verily 89 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 89 by Wilh.
The cathecolamines serves and triggers an impressive number specialized physiological and neurochemical etc functions and actions impeded by the toxicological impact of perphenazine; vital mechanisms regulating e.
Dangerously interfering with the hydroxy- lation of phenylalanine to tyrosine and subsequent dihydropteridine reductase, the transamination of tyrosine to p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate and concurrent reaction with O2 to form homogentisate is significantly incapacitated, thus provoking detrimental accumulation of the nerve poison phenylpyruvic acid in the body fluids as well as in varietal tissues where it evades most drug monitoring and toxicological screening procedures usw.
The actual reaction is catalyzed by citrate synthase, and via interconversions of various carboxylic acids the acetyl coenzyme A formed from pyruvate finally is completely oxidized to carbon dioxide.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report of ATP a sedentary, 80 kilos officeholder normally expends 60—70 kg ATP in 24 hours!
The oxaloacetate may undergo transamination to aspartate, be converted into glucose or pyruvate or condensate with acetyl coenzyme A to form citrate are also deleteriously impeded!
Extracellular fluids including blood plasma — containing sodium as their pre- 92 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 92 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report dominant cation, and intracellular fluids — having potassium as their dominant cation, respectively amount to 25 and 33 percent of the body weight.
The operational power of these transmembrane complexes responsible for pumping protons across the inner mitochondrial membrane i.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report As regards peptide hormones, catecholamines and continue reading of the G-protein class utilizing guanine nucleotide-binding proteins to interface with target proteins e.
Cyclic adenosine monophosphate is supposed to bind to the regulatory subunit of protein kinase thus dissociating the catalytic subunit vitally responsible for the phosphorylation of a wide spectrum enzymes and other proteins, and it en- hances the degradation of storage fuels, increases the secretion of acid by the gastric mucosa, leads to the dispersion of melanin pigment granules, diminishes the aggregation of blood platelets and induces the opening of chloride channels etc.
All enzymes are believed to be synthesized intracellularly, and most of them certainly carry out their functions within the cells in which they are formed.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report put and properties of e.
Perphenazine will perilously inhibit the thermal transition of ribonuclease, and the conformational transition of α-lactalbumin is either slowed down or comple- tely barred — the formation of molten globules is constrained, and the hydrogen bond donor of serine, aspartate and asparagine is frequently harmed natural dis- ruption of α-helicles is thereby obstructed.
A sequence of these bases is called a codon, and specifies an amino acid.
Petitionary befitting and professionally agreeable though, I regret to say may un- pretentious treatise on perphenazine and some of its accursed side effects has been significantly marred both qualitatively and quantitatively by principled ob- servance of the retaliatory precautions announced at page 12 of this report.
Proceeding within the choking and flimsy limitations dictated by conventional, medical knowledge, I shall close my run-of-the-mill discourse with a handful remarks of more summary nature.
Perphenazine is an explicitly backstabbing poison capable of maiming and killing you in a truly horrifying number of ways.
Some of the side effects described may have a latency period of 25—30 years as DNA damage is likely to accrue over a lifetime, and because the efficiency of our DNA repair mechanisms is individual and decreases with aging.
The Norwegian Police "Security" Service has established several companies and otherwise provided civilian jobs for many of their operative agents — their officers may e.
Here in Brattvåg they operated a seemingly unpretentious shop offering properly bugged scanners enabling you to "eavesdrop" some of the radio communication between ordinary patrol wagons etc — as far as we know this is the first time PST has entered upon a regular business venture exclusively to map the modi operandi of a single person.!
Since 1998 the Police "Security" Service has expanded both their formal and irregular cooperation with the Norwegian public health service dramatically cf Doc 627, pp 60—61and a substantial percentage thoroughly depraved and mentally ill politicians are largely blameworthy for this baleful development cf Doc 2037.
Intimate collaboration between the public health service and PST provides significant "benefits" for both camps; Norwegian physicians, psychologists, sociologists and nurses etc may e.
Whoever eats their eggs will die, and when one is broken, an adder is hatched.
Their cobwebs are useless for clothing; they cannot cover themselves with what they make.
Their deeds are evil deeds, and acts of violence are in their hands.
Their feet rush into sin; they are swift to shed innocent blood.
Their thoughts are evil thoughts; ruin and destruction mark their ways.
The way of peace they do not know; there is no justice in their paths.
They have turned them into crooked roads; no-one who walks in them will know peace.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report There are thousands of obnoxious examples illustrating the nationwide and massive abuse of the cobweb-optics and concealed microphones by PST representatives and the Norwegian health service, and one of the worst incidents in that respect doubtlessly took place here in my own county, Haram, in August 2001 when Mr Hector Hugo MIRANDA murdered his wife, children and himself in order to escape further persecution by Norwegian authorities.
Mr Miranda — a political refugee who had suffered human rights violating incarceration and torture in his fatherland, had initially been silly enough to place his confidence in Norwegian authorities who forthrightly betrayed him and secretly surveilled his most private abodes.
In agreement with their arrogant and thoughtless disposition, the Norwegian health professionals and police officers engaged to carry out the AV and absolutely condemnable monitoring fatally underestimated Mr Miranda's vigilance and resoluteness; it's clear Mr Miranda had been perfectly aware the abominable espionage several weeks before peremptorily deciding to slay his family and himself, and that he strongly suspected other immigrants in the insular vicinity was continuously offended in the same, iniquitous manner.
Subsequent to Mr Miranda's death, local health authorities and collaborating sheriff — Mr Jens Vidar BJØRKEDAL cf Doc 240 — naturally did their very best to cover up the illicit and lethally provocative maltreatment they'd exposed him to.
The Norwegian police force overflows with insidiously double-dealing and racist jingoists surreptitiously exerting themselves to minimize the number of immigrants in Norway, and it should be throughly emphasized that the PST et al systematically endeavor to depict e.
In order to publicly create and uphold a superficially believable picture of most foreigners as a grave intrastatal threat, Norwegian police officers — in increasingly degree through delinquent and hideously opprobrious cooperation with the official health service — will make industrious efforts 107 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 107 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report dastardly assassinate etc those superior to or different from themselves.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report and are sometimes equipped with a sensitive microphone recording e.
Besides; reconnaissance has brought home that a standard pin tumbler lock produced by the massively police infiltrated Norwegian company TrioVing is installed in the victim's front door, and that his homely burglar alarm will be mere piece of cake to put out of action.
Due to outlined intelligence gathering the depraved burglars will possess pretty accurate information about the various rooms and movables — taking care not to leave e.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report close to v.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report 4 THE VICTIM'S FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND PRIVACY ARE ACUTELY VIOLATED — METHODICAL PROVOCATIONS AND ATTACKS At this point of time the state authorized aggressors will lean back in their chairs studying the victim's intimate indoor privacy on a number of video monitors installed in front of them.
Surprisingly oftentimes harboring homosexual tendencies and nearly always morbidly obsessed with penile bulkiness and shapes, the official paraphiliacs selectively will go for close-up shots of assholes and penoscrotal features It should be emphasized though that these swinish voyeurs seldom enact their homoerotic propensities through sexual intercourse — as a matter of fact they're curiously dependent on their wives and concubines venerally as well as for "moral support"!
Their mistresses are frequently spying and collecting information on behalf of their ball-fixated and most crooked under-the-cover dicks.
Frowardly unwilling to distinguish clearly between well-paid and wholly consenting pornstars and the uninformed victims whose basic privacy they've villainously ruined through criminal intrusions and espionage, many of the PST officers 've watched hundreds of hard-core erotic films exclusively for pleasure while their hounded observanda are asleep or otherwise don't require constant attention.
Besides their sexually motivated malefaction, the PST terrorists will record the personalia of every person visiting or otherwise enjoying social contact with the victim — all surveillance procedures referred to above may be extended so as to encompass the victim's family, friends and more peripheral acquaintances.
The morally flyblown PST gangsters will also and especially register any personal peculiarities and routines of potential value for forthcoming attacks on the victim's health, life and belongings etc.
As the state hired and notorious badasses feel they've acquired satisfying insight into the victim's household activities, systematical and covert provocations to spoil the latter's mental equilibrium are launched.
In order to induce regular paranoia, the PST bugbears will design the variform harassment suchwise an alarming feeling of beeing persecuted results.
The victim will either remove permanently or for security reasons replace the battery immediately — however; if the latter solution is chosen, he or she may experience that the actual beeping reoccurs after a short period of time.!
Inside the wall — less than two meters from the victim's bed — a hellish device constantly gives off ultrasonic noises inaudible to the human ear.
Tired and confused after the nocturnal terrorism, the victim may discover that — although it had functioned perfectly well previous evening — the automatic filter coffee maker https://chakefashion.com/casino/casino-cast-list.html stone-dead.
Finishing work, the victim may find his private car unlocked — though he or she knows with absolute certainty the vehicle indeed was locked when they left it.
Well inside their apartment or house, the victim may observe a quizzical woman actually a debauched stool pigeon hired and instructed by the PST officers wearing a yellow sou'wester and spectacular poncho seemingly watching their residence from a nearby parking lot, and 20—30 minutes later they may receive a bizarre phone call.
At this point of time the average victim have an impression of beeing recurrently haunted by disturbingly weird incidents, and a subversive insecurity feeling normally pervades their mind.
Opportunistically "striking while the iron more info hot" and loathsomely exploiting the chemogenic derangement, the PST officers may now phone the local emergency ward or mental health care personnel presenting themselves as v.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report with the victim allegedly and otherwise will be spoiled if their identity usw perchance should be betrayed.
Thereupon — slyly faking genuine and warmhearted concernment — the Norwegian police skunks speciously and rather detailed reports the victim's recent behavior as disquieting and socially offbeat with markedly psychopathological and potentially dangerous manifestations.
In some cases, however, the PST rats de facto will introduce themselves as police officers falsely claiming they've received several alarming complaints from trustworthy persons worrying about the victim's psychiatric status etc, and in other cases the entire and venomous hotchpot is an offensively rotten mishmash of clear-cut criminality and substantial corruption jumbled up through preplanned and deliberately lawless cooperation between the police and the ignominiously double-dealing public health service.
As the simplehearted victim most unwisely rattles off a truthful account of his weird experiences the preceding days, the frequently corrupted health professionals may nod encouragingly while launching a handful enmeshing though seemingly innocuous questions.
When the victim a few days or weeks later — possibly accompanied by their lawyer — are permitted to look over and perhaps copy the different entries in their "medical record", they may — at first — feel fairly convinced they're studying the ghastly anamnesis usw of an absolute stranger.!
The actual descriptions of their background and factual behavior etc may deviate perversely and distinctly systematically from the truth in order to falsely justify v.
The police schemed provocations — which far and away may be more comprehensive, enduring and truculent than actually described above — may nevertheless be constructed, timed and intensified suchwise as to bring about other and more pernicious outcomes than unjustified psychiatric internment and stigmatizing alone.
Other frequently sought "payoffs" includes suiciding the police may v.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report e.
Cf Doc 2907 — "ANNOTATIONS".
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report PST IN BRATTVÅG Subsequent annotations may be read as an unmediated continuation of pp 80—81 of nearby gravamen — Suspecting no criminality or irregularities aside from the satanic terrorism systematically brought about by themselves and their festered accomplices cf pp 11—30 uswthe facinorous PST kooks nevertheless had their own and screwed motives for dragging on the trenchantly cranky harrying of me.
During their nefarious and formerly described aggressions in Oslo, the various PST agents invariably reported they forthrightly had been detected whenever attempting to surveil or stealthily pursue me.
In NO-Brattvåg the PST goons forthwith acquired point-blank support for their wicked and lawless insanities from the evilest mortal ever settling in NO-Haram County; Mr Thorleif MARKEN b Dec 16, 1940 — the local sheriff!
Mr Marken was formally and permanently appointed sheriff in 1989, and held this office until 2001 when he relinquished due to somatic illness.
It's extremely seldom — even amongst the worst criminals — we're encountering individuals entirely destitute of at least a few creditable personality traits, but indeed; Mr Marken is one of these rare creatures!
Of humble birth and without close relatives approaching his inordinate malevolence and reasonable Stanford-Binet IQ of 143 cf Doc 1536, p 87Mr Marken consuetudinary conceals his real intentions and feelings from exposure — even the social interaction with his wife and children is a purely hammy business scurvily enacted to beguile these credulous everyday characters.
During his incumbency Mr Marken's behavior and ratiocination steadily grew more offbeat and befuddled.
Initially suspecting I was a mere fruitcake, his clodhopping mind transmuted my markedly altruistic and human rights advocating being into a cold-blooded and superbly adroit crimelord in a matter of months.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Mr Marken's unsound and eminently iniquitous brain almost unceasingly hatched new plots to terrorize, harm and murder me.
There's no evidence Mr Marken ever informed other PST representatives about his deranged designs.
While Mr Marken's personal PST engagement most definitely were morbidly out-of-bounds and totally indefensible, his established police lieutenant and second in command at the local sheriff office, Mr Kjell Børje MOE cf Doc 377 — entries of Oct 19 and 28, 1998wisely maintained a significantly squarer course vis-à-vis other PST agents.
In striking contrast to the uniformly atrocious and radically false Mr Marken, Mr Moe is an experienced and generally well-thought-of military senior officer of sensible empathic and beneficent proclivity.
Mr Moe never partook the attempted assassinations regularly launched by Mr Marken and other PST officers, but — alas — he certainly hold back piles of information about serious crimes committed by his colleagues.!
Many of the lawbreaking PST activities in Brattvåg has been upheld, actively partaken and sometimes initiated by the slimy whited sepulchers of the categorically scandalous and largely condemnable public health service.
Offering suitable sheltering, personnel, matériel and vast assistance in many other respects, sickly self-righteous and perversely wrongheaded "health" professionals in increasingly degree has adopted and underhandedly adapted to meet their specific and illicit needs the throughly unprincipled spy-tech 117 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 117 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report beforehand pertinent to special and intelligence gathering units of the police and armed forces alone!
One of the truly queerish incentives in this connection nonetheless remains unexposed: Erelong the constantly vexing PST hellhounds had reported they were unqualified as to determine my exact intellectual level, but that they anyhow felt positively convinced my general IQ exceeded 150 farther down the mucky road — as they acquired knowledge of some of my modest childhood feats, they consulted independent experts unreservedly declaring the actual accomplishments certainly equalled a Stanford-Binet IQ prodigiously transcending 200 and most probably surpassing 250 on said scale — and.
These illegally founded and macabre SIGs are still kept alive by brainsick, Norwegian officials By the way — the manifestly haywired preoccupation with parapsychological topics was not a wholly span-new craze.
Mr Myklebust had formerly published a book about a moderately second sighted kinswoman — Ms Olga TANDSTAD SKAUE — and was currently compiling material for a biography about her clairvoyant father, Mr Karl Johan TANDSTAD, and other Norwegians presumably possessing paranormal faculties.
Ignorant his identity, whereabouts and objectives were duly imparted, Mr Myklebust and the accompanying woman left the scene after a while — slightly puzzled and discontended, I'm afraid.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Personal connections with the faintest smell of romance or sexuality 've always aroused fervent, pathological reactions amongst Norwegian PST officers and "health" personnel.
The PST swine suspected Ms Jøsok and her underaged daughters were particularly interesting specimens since I offered them this kind of personal assistance.
During the next weeks the exclusively male voyeurs scrutinized the perfectly unremarkable, bodily makeup of the small family without detecting anything unusual such and such — they concluded the teenybopper and her much younger sister had a physique altogether matching their respective age-groups, while they described the sexual attributes and general build of Ms Jøsok as "less attractive".!
The brainsick spies were much amused by Ms Dalsegg's whimsical behavior until they witnessed scenes described as explicitly pedophilic.
AV studying see more homely routines of this religious and gentle lady for a while, the contaminators concluded Ms Molvær seemed slightly depressed and listless — though they didn't quite understand why.
Somewhat delayed due to womanly makeup redoing, she smilingly appeared outside the shopping center I was about to leave.
A psychologist involved in the reprehensible and totally unlawful monitoring of me just click for source recently told Ms Johnsen I probably appreciated military garments and nice-assed gals, so she had purchased a pair of brand-new camo trousers and — expectantly kneeling on her car seats — she soon did her best to favorably expose her yummy and "warlike" bum.!
It was a well-disposed and charming miss, indeed — and a reasonably gifted one, too.
Some time ago ill-fated contaminants had broken into Ms Johnsen's private apartment installing their notorious cobweb-optics — allegedly to examine her mental health and "mating qualifications"!
Though the vile intruders left many and easily detectable vestiges, the overconfident Ms Johnsen failed to notice anything irregular.
Typically irradiating with delight when she managed to solve a given problem or formulate a particularly smashing sentence, the truly subhuman aggressors concluded Ms Johnsen not actually was crazy svenske casino sider she was "funny and slightly eccentric", only.
Ms Guseck is a photogenic and rather amatorious primadonna, and the constantly marring PST officers and "health" professionals 've of course criminally downloaded dozens of strictly private photos of her from my PC and corresponding video monitor — also shots of explicitly pornographic nature.!
It goes practically unsaid Ms Guseck's private apartments 've been systematically and massively infected with AV spy-tech — all her phone conversations 've been recorded, and comprehensive annotations on her intimate privacy journalized.
Cf Doc's 7084 and 8017 etc.
Official and sexually motivated violations of the palsy-walsy privacy of juridically blameless citizens are extremely commonplace in Norway today, and 120 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 120 by Wilh.
During their long-standing presence in Brattvåg, the PST officers 've also carried out systematic and extensive monitoring etc wholly independent of the public health service and other official institutions.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Studying nearby complaint and adjoining enclosures cf p 2 — "Comments on disqualification"reasonable sane and sagacious readers pretty soon will launch an almost inevitable question: "Can the various crimes and atrocities described in this report possibly 66 casino been perpetrated by mentally sound creatures.?
Although psychiatric ill-health and multifarious impairment of higher cerebral functions are alarmingly common amongst Norwegian officials, the greater part of them tends to be criminally responsible as personality disorders — particularly psychopathy — and various perversions are predominant conditions.
The pathologically distorted thought and behavior patterns normally typifying Norwegian public officials and senior civil servants may however — viewed as an endemic phenomenon — partially rupture the commonly accepted boundaries imposed by international norms of disease classification.
In Doc's 633 and 2037 — pp 67 and 95, respectively, I've described a number of NPSMS' more or less pathognomonic symptoms — viz: 122 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 122 by Wilh.
The above collection of personality traits and symptoms manifestly typical but not necessarily conclusive of NPSMS, clearly invites to differentiated diagnosing; while the moodiness and fluctuating self-image are amongst the distinguishing features of the borderline personality, the thoroughgoing reality distortion and oftentimes systematic misinterpretation of events exhibited by some NPSMS afflicted individuals are truly archtypical of regular psychoses.
The severe, recurrent and wholly intentional misconduct and criminality fundamentally peculiar to NPSMS-villains are closest related to the antisocial personality disorder, however, but are more complex and frequently includes dangerous paranoia, religious delusions and sheer diabolism.
In most psychiatric disorders it's relatively uncomplicated to identify some precipitating factors — i.
When it comes to the NPSMS it's usually hard to detect decisive, psychotogenic factors — as a matter of fact one may feel slightly ill at ease attempting to discriminate readily observable, morbid features from entirely self-willed and obviously unreasonable evil- mindedness.!
Ethically indefensible, evilness purely for the sake of evilness may assuredly be a ponerologically acceptable and ipso facto rational aim in itself most religious dogmas omitted, of course.
As regards predisposing factors, genetic endowment and hereditary metabolic, anatomical and physiological insufficiencies in prefrontal cortices, the thalamencephalon, hypothalamus and limbic system may be crucial for the actual onset and subsequent diagnosing of NPSMS.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report orbitofrontal circuit, nucleus accumbens, ventral striatum, corpus Luysii and thalamic nuclei are common NPSMS features.
Serotonin's neuronal transmitter functions and capability to modulate v.
Despite depicted brain abnormalities, many NPSMS-caitiffs are capable of performing just about normally on standard neuropsychological tests — working memory, concentration and the general intelligence seems to be intact.
Those unfamiliar with e.
There exist a universally acclaimed and professional code of deontological principles serving as ethical cornerstone for medical teachers and practitioners, namely the "Hippocratic oath".
I will follow that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous.
I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such 124 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 124 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report counsel; and in like manner I will not give to a woman a pessary to produce abortion.
With purity and with holiness I will pass my life and practice my Art.
I will not cut persons laboring under the stone, but will leave this to be done by men who are practitioners of this work.
Into whatever house I enter, I will go into them for the benefit of the sick, and will abstain from every voluntary act of mischief and corruption; and, further from the seduction of females or males, of freemen and slaves.
Whatever, in connection with my professional practice or not, in connection with it, I see or hear, in the life of men, which ought not to be spoken of abroad, I will not divulge, as reckoning that all such should be kept secret.
While I continue to keep this Oath unviolated, may it be granted to me to enjoy life and the practice of the Art, respected by all men, in all times!
But should I trespass and violate this Oath, may the reverse be my lot!
Patients are my first concern.
I will listen to them, and provide the best care I can.
I will be honest, respectful, and compassionate towards patients.
I will do my best to help anyone in medical need, in emergencies.
I will make every effort to ensure that the rights of all patients are respected, including vulnerable groups who lack means of making their needs known.
I will exercise my professional judgment as independently as possible, uninfluenced by political pressure or the social standing of my patient.
I will not put personal profit or advancement above my duty to my patient.
I recognize the special value of human life, but I also know that pro- longation of human life is not the only aim of health care.
If I agree to perform abortion, I agree that it should take place only within an ethical and legal framework.
I will not provide treat- ments that are pointless or harmful, or which an informed and com- petent patient refuses.
I will help patients find the information and support they want to make decisions on their care.
I will answer as truthfully as I can, and respect patients' decisions, unless that puts others at risk of substantial harm.
If I cannot agree with their requests, I will explain why.
If my patients have limited mental awareness, I will still encourage them to participate in decisions as much as they feel able.
I will do my best to maintain confidentiality about all patients.
If there are overriding reasons preventing me keeping a patient's confidentiality, I will explain them.
I recognize my know- 125 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 125 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report ledge has limits: I will get advice from colleagues when needed.
I will acknowledge my mistakes.
I will do my best to keep myself and my colleagues informed of new developments, and ensure that poor standards or bad practices are exposed to those who can im- prove them.
I will show respect for all those with whom I work and be ready to share my knowledge by teaching others what I know.
I will use my training and professional standing to improve the community in which I work.
I will treat patients equitably and support a fair and humane distribution of health resources.
I will try to influence and redirect authorities whose policies harm public health.
I will oppose policies which breach internationally accepted standards of human rights.
I will strive to change laws that are contrary to patients' interests or to my professional ethics.
While I continue to keep this Oath unviolated, may it be granted to me to enjoy life and the practice of the Art, respected by all, in all times.
A judicious and impartial being may turn over and search underneath each stone and windfall without finding factually extenuating circumstances in this case.
I will follow that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous.
I will be honest, respectful, and compassionate towards patients.
I will make every effort to ensure that the rights of all patients are respected.
I will exercise my professional judgment as independently as possible, uninfluenced by political pressure or the social standing of my patient.
I will not provide treatments that are pointless or harmful, or which an informed and competent patient refuses.
I will acknowledge my mistakes.
I will try to influence and redirect authorities whose policies harm public health.
I will strive to change laws that are contrary to patients interests or to my professional ethics.
I will oppose policies which breach internationally ac- cepted standards of human rights.
The revolting truth, however, is that preaching human rights and ethical code observance to Norwegian authorities — the public "health" service vastly included — in this case invariably have had the same, questionable effects as solemnly offering a literally bloody, honeyed and invigorating sacrament to a swarm screwy, hell- ordained and plague-spreading rat fleas.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report corresponding legal system distinctly prevalent amongst Norwegian officiaries practically routinely abusing their professional privileges to e.
The blatant hypocrisy and treacherous opportunism by and large characterizing nowadays Norwegian officials, was be- fittingly coined "bigoterie" in medieval France — germanely delineating the grungy and widespread practice amongst Norwe- gian Normans to worship the Christian Trinity as well as their heathen deities out of strictly materialistic motives.
So, the largely marauding Norwegians shamelessly exploited Gallic benevolence and Catholic naïveté maximally, and quite a few of them underwent sacramental affusion and immersion more than seven times!
While seeing the pope for absolution or praying for exculpation, their ignoble minds were busy planning new, abominable violations!
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report nally benedictive; proh pudor — what a messy mass!
Moreover we strongly feel that the Norwegian society generally should bestow significantly more of their attention purely revering our allelopathic lawbreaking.
Doc 627, p 58 ; 129 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 129 by Wilh.
Shortly; the ghoulish corruption, abject pol- troonery and utterly unreasonable fiendishness abidingly brandished by Norwegian authorities in my case, will fill every honorable man and woman with the most intense and enduring contempt and hostility towards them!
The systematic, repugnant, recidivistic and long-drawn-out violations does not only attest to a deep-rooted disrespect for basal human rights and lawfulness, it also demonstrate a transparent contempt for the discerning qualities and safeguarding potency of other nations.
The sociopathic manipulation of facts and emetic hypocrisy wontedly promulgated by Norwegian politicians and their official delegates to cosmopolitan fora, circumstantiate the fact that Norwegian author- ities furtively look upon — inter alios — the United Nations, the Council of Europe and the International Helsinki Federation as inferior assem- blages of retarded easy marks and puling cowards!
Besides, aposematically liberticidal bureaucrats opportunistically championing gross injustice steadfastly goosesteps towards the totali- tarian, Norwegian police state.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report doing anything honorable or otherwise correct when opposing alternatives exist!
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report state aided lawbreaking generously appanaged by fateful misconceptions is by now an accepted way of living amongst officials, and parliament incited troublemaking has become a major industry!
Preceding quotations clearly reflects much of the cap-à-pie Pharisaism and scurvy misconduct wontedly showed off by Norwegian officials attempting to belittle, conceal and obstruct adequate investigation etc of their extensive corruption.
To these chronic and obtrusively arrogant malefactors, your adherence to soft-boiled human rights and ethical codes simply means they can protract and possibly intensify their obnoxious offences without risking dismaying sanctions and burdensome, international interference.
Instead of mollycoddling and inadvertently spurring Norwegian authorities mayheming the human rights, the world community at large and international fora in particular should go for explicitly pragmatic solutions to halt and legally punish corresponding and vaingloriously contemptuous criminality.
More precisely, we can imagine a highly specialized, mobile and cosmopolitan intervention unit of superbly fit and comprehensively trained police officers duly commissioned to secure final proofs and forcibly apprehend state supported culprits — e.
Principally dedicated to human rights' enforcement rather than conventional counterterrorist tasks, judicious application of cogent measures to prevent abuse of portrayed unit is crucial.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report More specifically returning to the Norwegian public "health" service, it should be properly emphasized some of the meanest villains hired to routinely and absolutely illegally terrorize me here in NO-Brattvåg neither are physicians nor nurses, but fulsomely rotten ambulance drivers.
A fairly homogeneous pack sociopaths and grubby good-for-nothings with a general Stanford-Binet IQ clustered betwixt 118 and 121, three of these befittingly and irrevocably hell-doomed chauffeurs has distinguished themselves by particularly swinish behavior — viz: 1.
Mr Ron Borge "Schizo" FINNØY, NO-Brattvåg, 2.
Mr Torgeir "Rattus" AKSLEN, NO-Brattvåg, and 3.
Mr Kjell-Arne OTTERLEI, NO-Brattvåg.
For years on end we've witnessed how this accursed troika and other depraved "health" professionals wholly on their own initiative — or to carry out orders unlawfully sanctioned e.
This right shall be protected by law.
No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.
Article 7 No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical click to see more scientific experimentation.
Article 9 Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention.
No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.
Article 10 All persons deprived of their liberty shall be treated with humanity and 137 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 137 by Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person.
Article 12 Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to choose his residence.
Everyone shall be free to leave any country, including his own.
The above-mentioned rights shall not be subject to any restrictions except those which are provided by law, are necessary to protect national security, public order ordre publicpublic health or morals or the gulfport casino map and freedoms of others, and are consistent with the other rights recognized in the present Covenant.
No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of the right to enter his own country.
Article 14 All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals.
In the determination of any criminal charge against svenske casino sider, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law.
The Press and the public may be excluded from all or part of a trial for reasons of morals, public order ordre public or national security in a democratic society, or when the interest of the private lives of the parties so requires, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice; but any judgment rendered in a criminal case or in a suit at law shall be made public except where the interest of juvenile persons otherwise requires or the proceedings concern matrimonial disputes or the guardianship of children.
Article 16 Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.
Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete report Article 19 Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.
Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.
Article 21 The right of peaceful assembly shall be recognized.
No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those imposed in confor- mity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order ordre publicthe protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Bästa svenska online casinon med stora bonusar och utbetalningar. ✅ Njut av att spela de bästa casino spel inklusive Spelautomater, blackjack, roulett.


Enjoy!
Free Spins » Guide til 1000+ Free Spins uden indskudskrav i dec 2019 »
Valid for casinos
Norske nett casino, sjekk ut den beste nett casino og tilbyr her!
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
svenske casino sider

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Desember 2019, saksnummer 18Li8512), og er regulert av den svenske spillemyndigheten, Spelinspektionen. Operatøren er regulert i Storbritannia av the.


Enjoy!
Bedste Mobil Roulette Sider | Top Danske Mobil Roulette Sider‎
Valid for casinos
RIKSRETT --- ANMODNING OM BISTAND FRA DANSKE OG SVENSKE MYNDIGHETER
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Abandoned $10,000,000 Mansion of Pablo Escobar (paint balled inside!)

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Det finnes mange spennende og gode casino på nett.. som Malta eller Storbritannia, men enkelte casinoer har sider som er spesielt tilpasset norske spillere.. Svenske spillere som ønsker å spille på utenlandske casinoer kan lese mer her:.


Enjoy!
Redsbet - Sports Betting, Casino, Fantasy
Valid for casinos
💚 Mr Green Casino (350 spins + 1000 kr. i velkomstbonus)
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Extra Cash VELKOMMEN TIL NETT-CASINO.
Her vil du finne de beste svenske online kasinoer, kasino spill, og selvfølgelig tilbud Vi i nett-casino.
Det er også grunnen til at vi ønsker å dele med svenske casino sider all den informasjon og erfaring vi har i disse årene i spillindustrien har samlet.
Vi anbefaler bare de aller beste online kasino der også vi leke og bruke vår tid i, noe som betyr at vi kan garantere deg en utrolig underholdendemen også trygt og sikkert spillopplevelse når du velger en av de online think, casino del mar puerto rico congratulate som vi anbefaler.
Hvis du er en ny spiller, så dette spillet verden på nettet garantert til å føle noe vanskelig og komplisert i begynnelsen, fordi det er en nesten uendelig tilbakebetaling av online kasino, som tilbyr men også kasinospill.
Hvordan kan du som ny spiller egentlig vet hvor det lønner seg å spille?
Det er nettopp derfor vi har besluttet å sette opp en nettside som Nätcasinon.
Vi har hørt flere års erfaring i bransjen, og vi er glade for å dele all vår informasjon.
Storspiller er det sjokkerende beste online kasino som er lei av at highrollere blir behandlet som alle andre.
Ja, det er også mulig å dra inn Storspiller free spins tilbud, og det vi har sett så langt er langt mer ekstremt enn hos de fleste konkurrentene deres.
Alt Storspiller faktisk trengte å gjøre var å snakke med de som satset mest, høre deres klager og så skape tilbudet enhver highroller drømmer om.
For å finne din egen favoritt online kasino, så det gjelder bare å prøve vei til favorittspillsider og gambling.
Hva er utrolig sjenerøse i det øyeblikket når du spiller online, har du alltid en sjanse til å først sjekke ut og utrforska ulike see more kasino gratis før du gjør ditt første innskudd.
For å åpne en ny spillerkonto på online kasino er helt gratis, noe som betyr at du kan registrere en eller flere spillkontoer på så mange forskjellige online kasinoer som du føler, til du finner din favoritt spillnettstedet.
For å komme i gang med å spille, trenger du bare velge én av de online kasinoer som vi har listet opp her ved siden av, åpne en ny spillerkonto og tadaa!
Så er du klar til å spille i noen minutter.
Hvor enkelt og raskt når som helst.
Ved å åpne spillet kontoer for flere dusinvis av online kasinoer, vil du også ha tilgang til en hel masse helsköna og sjenerøse tilbud via e-post.
Så når du har registrert en ny spillekontomå du holde et øye med innboksen i e-posten, fordi du aldri vet hva tilbud venter på deg!
Hvis du vil vite mer om de ulike populære casinospill og spilleautomater som tilbys på nettet i dag så kan du sjekke ut disse nedenfor.
Vi har også listet opp under de mest spilte sporene i dagens situasjon på online kasino kan du lese mer om eller prøve spill gratis.
Selv om du ikke har et øye på alle de nøyaktige reglene for spillet i disse spillene, slik at vi er sikker på at du vil nyte.
Spilleautomater eller spilleautomater er spill som du kan begynne å spille med en gang, enten du er ny eller mer erfarne spillere.
Eksempel Spill nå ved å velge din favoritt under og nyt!
Velkommen til den spennende verden av online!
Her har vi listet opp over noen av de mest spilte sporene akkurat nå.
Ved å klikke på en av spillene du kan teste spille dette spillet helt gratis.
Slots er en av de garanterte mest spilte online i dagens situasjon, som ikke er overraskendefordi disse spillene er utrolig enkelt å lære, men også svært underholdendeog du vil trives i selskap av disse enkle flere timer.
Det har blitt sagt at ingen forskjell om du er nye eller mer erfarne spillere i online kasino click here, fordi sporene er spill som alle kan spille.
Det gjelder bare å velge hvilket spill du vil spille, bestemme hvor mye du ønsker å satse, og klikk spill.
Hvis du er en ny spiller, anbefaler vi at du definitivt ta noen test spill i sporene.
I tillegg til spilleautomaterkan du spille en hel masse andre underholdende kasinospill.
Enten du liker klassiske kasinospill eller det nyeste spillet nyheter, slik at du er sikker på å finne mer Century spillet akkurat som deg.
Bordspill som Roulette, BlackjackBaccarat, Craps og Poker er spill som har blitt spilt i år med både klassiske land kasinoer, svenske casino sider nå også i online kasino.
Du kan spille alle disse spillene på nesten alle online kasinoer i dagens situasjon.
I tillegg til disse klassiske spillene, har du også en sjanse til å spille flere spill og dusinvis av svenske casino sider casino, som betyr at du spiller mot ekte dealere.
Hvis du tilfeldigvis lei av de klassiske spillene, anbefaler vi deg å ta noen test spill live casino.
Ved å spille i live casino, slik at du kan oppnå en nesten autentisk casino følelse, rett fra ditt eget hjem casino ads />Vi har listet opp under de mest spilte kasinospill i tillegg til de ovennevnte spor.
Du kan velge å spille på sparket, eller selv å lære mer om spillet og spillereglene.
Beste norske casinoer online finner du her:.
Fordi det er så veldig mange norske online kasinoer och i dag, og nye lanseringer noensinneså er konkurransen om spillerne er svært vanskelig.
Selvfølgelig, alle ønsker å tiltrekke seg så mange nye spillere som mulig til sine spillsider.
Dette er veldig svenske casino sider for deg som spiller, fordi du kan ta del av en hel masse sjenerøse kampanjer og bonuser som du ikke vil ha muligheten til å ta en del av hvis du spiller casinospill i land kasinoer.
Det er flere titalls tilbud å velge mellom når du går inn nätcasinornas underholdende verden.
Free spins betyr gratis runder på bestemte plasser.
Dette er en av de mest populære tilbudene på online kasino for øyeblikket, kan du vinne på mer røst ut av kasinoene som vi anbefaler på våre sider.
Free spins blir tilbudt oftest til enten de mest spilte spilleautomatereller til og med til spennende nye spill.
Du vil da sikkert liker disse gratis rundene!
click at this page annet svært populært tilbud er forskjellige casinobonusereller også kjent som bonuser.
Med bonuser kan du vinne en hel masse ekstra lekepenger å spille med.
En casino bonus kan være for eksempel: 100% bonus opp til 5000 SEK.
Dette betyr at innskudd i kasinoet vil dobles frem til 5000 kr.
For eksempel, du gjør et innskudd på 1000 SEK.
Så vil du automatisk få 1000 kroner ekstra å spille med.
Det er flere titalls varianter av disse, og du kan finne avtaler som du kan få tusenvis av ekstra penger helt gratis å spille med.
Bonuser tilbys også til eksisterende spillere, så du må holde et øye med innboksen i e-posten for spesialtilbud.
Sist men ikke minst, kan du også komme over gratis innsats penger i online kasino.
Gratis gambling penger innebærer en viss mengde gratis kronene som vil bli lagt til kontoen din når du registrerer en ny konto.
Med gratis gambling penger, du alltid kommer til å velge hvilket spill du ønsker å spille, noe som er veldig nyttig hvis du er en ny spiller, fordi du har en sjanse til å prøvespille forskjellige spill gratis, men med en sjanse til å faktisk vinne ekte pengepremier.
I tillegg til disse svenske casino sider, kan du også møte mange andre bonuser, kampanjer, konkurranser og VIP-tilbud.
Online kasinoer tar godt vare på sine spillere, og du kan være sikker på at postkassen fylles med sjenerøs når du har registrert en konto.
Dette var en kort introduksjon til nätcasinornas utrolig underholdende spill verden.
Vi anbefaler at du registrerer en konto og begynne å spille med en gang, etter som du vil ha en mye bedre idé ut av dette spillet Jungle online.
Åpne en konto nå for noen av de ovennevnte online kasinoer og gjør deg klar for spennende spillopplevelse som ingen andre!

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

De bedste udenlandske online casinoer, betting og spillesider uden nemid på. der kan være forbundet med upålidelige udenlandske-casino sider kan være alt.


Enjoy!
Casino på nett: Bonus og gratisspinn hos norske casinoer med spilleautomater
Valid for casinos
Bunkier - klub
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Unibet Livecasino

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Grupowo i w parach, sportowe ciuchy, skórzaki i mundurowcy, miśki i atleci, a także normalnej budowy ciała. Skini i punki również mile widziani. Tworzymy klub.


Enjoy!
Bedste Mobil Roulette Sider | Top Danske Mobil Roulette Sider‎
Valid for casinos
Norske nett casino, sjekk ut den beste nett casino og tilbyr her!
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Jason Derulo Concert at Fantasy Springs Casino Resort 2-18-18

BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Som online casinospiller kan det godt betale sig at spille med casino bonuser, og der er heldigvis et væld af forskellige casino bonusser at vælge mellem.. er siden for dig, der ønsker den bedste information om Svenske kasinoer online.. På Nettet Bedste Spillemaskiner Casino Artikler Danske Casino Sider Velkomst.


Enjoy!
Norsk casino og spilleautomater på nett
Valid for casinos
Norsk casino og spilleautomater på nett
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Magnus Carlsson Født 45 år Utdannet svenske casino sider Beskjeftigelse Sanger, Nasjonalitet Musikalsk karriere Sjanger Instrumentvokal Aktive år 1994— Nettsted IMDb Lars Magnus Carlsson født i er en svensk og artist.
Han er kjent fra bandene Barbados ogmen har vært svenske casino sider siden 2005.
Carlsson har deltatt i svenske åtte ganger.
Magnus Carlsson er utdannet ved musikkgymnasiet i hvor han svenske casino sider i to år, samt på Musikkhögskolan i samme by.
Her gikk han i fire år og studerte til å bli sangpedagog og musikklærer.
Barbados 1992—2002 Mens Magnus Carlsson gikk på Musikkhögskolan istartet han og fire andre gutter bandet.
Deres første plate kom ut i 1994, og Carlsson var bandets vokalist.
Barbados ble etter hvert svært populære i Sverige, og bandet ga ut tolv album.
Vinteren 2002 bestemte Carlsson seg for å slutte som sanger i Barbados etter rundt ti år som vokalist.
Alcazar besto fra før svenske casino siderog.
Alcazars første offisielle opptreden som kvartett var i svenskemed sangen «Not a Sinner, Nor a Saint».
Alcazar var forhåndsfavoritter, og de endte til slutt på en tredjeplass.
Med Alcazar here Magnus Carlsson stor suksess, og de to albumene Alcazar gav ut etter hans ankomst, solgte svært godt.
Høsten 2005 bestemte Alcazar seg for å ta en pause, og med dette fulgte starten på Magnus Carlssons solokarriere.
Solokarriere 2005— Høsten 2005 spilte han rollen som Teenage Angel i musikalen iog julen 2005 var han en av hovedartistene i julegallaen White Christmas i.
Våren 2006 deltok Carlsson for første gang som soloartist i Melodifestivalen med sangen «Lev livet!
Han vant delfinalen i og kom til finalen i.
» toppet senere Sveriges singelliste og er en av sangene på hans første soloplate, Magnus Carlsson, som kom ut våren 2006.
Det er utgitt to casino in florida usa map fra dette albumet: «Lev livet!
» og »Mellan continue reading och svart».
Julen 2006 gav Carlsson ut sitt andre julealbum, Spår i snön, med den tilhørende singelen «Wrap Myself in Paper».
I deltok Carlsson på nytt i Melodifestivalen med sangen «Live Forever».
Han konkurrerte i tredje delfinale 17.
Han gikk ikke videre til finalen, men singelen solgte likevel til gull med over 14 000 eksemplarer og nådde en tredjeplass på.
I 2015 deltok han i for åttende og hittil siste gang, med låten «Möt mig i Gamla stan» som endte på niendeplass i finalen.
Sommeren ga han ut singelen «Mitt livs gemål» sammen med.
Låten var tilegnet og og var skrevet av og.
Han har også deltatt i en rekke tv-programmer, blant annet i TV4s Körslaget i 2008 da han kom på tredjeplass med sitt kor fra.
Han har også jobbet som programleder i svenske og og driver sitt eget plateselskap.
Carlsson turnerer også rundt om i Sverige.
Magnus Carlsson har deltatt åtte ganger i Melodifestivalen, den svenske utgaven avbåde som soloartist og i gruppe: År Sang Med Plass 2000 «Se mej» Barbados 2.
Med listeplasseringer på den svenske singellisten.
Magnus Carlssons Officiella Hemsida engelsk.

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Bästa svenska online casinon med stora bonusar och utbetalningar. ✅ Njut av att spela de bästa casino spel inklusive Spelautomater, blackjack, roulett.


Enjoy!
Redsbet - Sports Betting, Casino, Fantasy
Valid for casinos
Casino på nett: Bonus og gratisspinn hos norske casinoer med spilleautomater
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
svenske casino sider